Abstract
Hepatitis C and polycythemia vera (PV) co-existence is not rare; it has been reported in the literature. Treatment with interferon (IFN) has been used to treat both conditions; however, the use of IFN in concomitant hepatitis C infection with PV and its outcome are rarely described in the literature. Here, we report a 56-years-old male patient with hepatitis C virus infection and PV, who was treated with IFN for his chronic hepatitis C, which resulted in significant improvement of HB as well as normalization of his bone marrow and eradication of the clone (Jak2 V617F).
Introduction
Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are hematological disorders distinguished by increased proliferation and buildup of mature myeloid cells in the bone marrow and peripheral blood. MPNs are classified as Philadelphia chromosome-positive or -negative [1]. The classic Philadelphia-negative MPNs include essential thrombocythemia, polycythemia vera (PV), and primary myelofibrosis [2]. They are usually sporadic; however, familial cases have been described in different parts of the world [3]. Several methods have been utilized in the treatment of MPN, such as cytoreduction, JAK 2 inhibitors, and interferon (IFN). In 1957, IFN was discovered by Isaacs and Lindenmann. IFNs are glycoproteins related to cytokines and have antitumor antiviral and immunomodulatory activities. There are 2 types of IFNs: type I and type II; type I IFNs includes IFNα and IFNβ. Type II IFN constitutes solely of IFNγ. Each type has unique genetic derivation, primary producing cells, and properties [4]. In the field of viral interference, it was believed that viral interference had been considered to be due to the direct action of one virus on the pathologic activity of a second agent, but later on, it was shown to be proteins that in turn activate several genes responsible for the biologic effects imputed to the IFNs in addition to their antiviral activity [5]. Nowadays, IFN is used widely in medical practice; it is used to treat neoplastic diseases, viral infections, and myeloproliferative disorders [4].
Case Report
The case is a fifty-six-year-old Egyptian gentleman diagnosed with hepatitis C virus infection in 2011 based on serology. Hepatitis C viral load was 2458678, genotype 4. Concomitantly, he was diagnosed with PV based on the WHO criteria 2008 due to persistently elevated hemoglobin level, above 18.5 gm/dL (13–17 g/dL). Further investigations showed Jak2 was positive with a low erythropoietin level. The patient received pegylated IFNα 2a in a dose of 180 mcg/week for 5 years. It took 2 years for the complete eradication of hepatitis C. He was cured of hepatitis c virus, and hemoglobin levels were normal (14–15.5 gm/dL), and repeated Jak2 v617f was negative. Bone marrow biopsy was done to evaluate for PV at the bone marrow level (panmyelosis). The bone marrow reported normal (no features suggestive of PV or other MPNs).
Discussion
Chronic inflammation and immunoregulation are likely to be involved in the pathogenesis of MPNs. Thereby, high levels of circulating inflammatory cytokines have been found and have prognostic value. Chronic inflammation diminishes IFN signaling, and from this point, the efficacy of IFN in MPNs was recognized [6].
IFN has an expanded range of biological and molecular activities, including cytotoxicity, tumor-promoting immune cell populations, activation of multiple proapoptotic genes and proteins, and downregulation of several antiapoptotic proteins. This component makes IFN an agreeable therapeutic agent in patients with cancer in general and in patients with MPNs in specific. IFN emphasizes special activities that support its use in MPNs, including PV. IFNs have direct inhibition of bone marrow fibroblast progenitor cells and suppression of hematopoietic progenitor proliferation, which results in controlling erythrocytosis and thrombocytosis [7]. In 1993, the therapeutic benefit described by Silver, followed by many studies, demonstrated the use of IFNα therapy for PV. IFNα therapy benefits include the induction of hematologic remission (with the elimination or reduction in the need for phlebotomy), control of thrombocytosis and leukocytosis, resolution of disease-associated symptoms (particularly refractory pruritus), and resolution of splenomegaly [8].
In 1991, IFN was first approved for the treatment of hepatitis C. It was introduced to treat chronic hepatitis C as IFNα, then improved by pegylation form, and then the addition of ribavirin resulted in a better sustained virologic response. At present, the knowledge of HCV complexity and character resulted in the evolution of direct-acting antivirals and IFN-free era. IFNs have 2 mechanisms of actions in treating hepatitis C: first, by binding to cell-surface receptors that signal through the system of Janus-activated kinase and signal transducers and activators of transcription, resulting in induction of numerous IFN-stimulated genes (double-stranded RNases, inhibitors of viral protein translation, and proteins that destabilize viral messenger RNA). The second mechanism is by modulating gene expression involved in the immune response, leading to activation of natural killer cells, maturation of dendritic cells, the proliferation of memory T cells, and prevention of T-cell apoptosis [9].
Hepatitis C is a silent disease, and 80% develop into a chronic infection. Chronically infected patients need to be treated with antiviral due to the high risk of progression of liver damage to cirrhosis or carcinoma if left without treatment. Treatment aims to reach a sustained virologic response, which means undetectable viral RNA over 6 months after treatment completion. The second goal of the therapy is to improve the quality of life and prevent progression to hepatocellular carcinoma [10]. Treatment is indicated for individuals with positive anti-HCV, HCV-RNA-positive patients with increased serum aminotransferase levels, and for whom there is histological evidence of chronic hepatitis. Some considerations should be considered when deciding to initiate treatment, which includes age, comorbidities, extrahepatic manifestations such as cryoglobulinemia and glomerulonephritis, and quality of life [11, 12].
Conclusion
For patients with concomitant PV and hepatitis C virus infection, IFN2 α is the preferred antiviral cytoreductive agent due to its dual effect.
Acknowledgement
The authors wish to show my gratitude to the Internal Medicine Residency program, to Dr. Dabia Hamad Almohanadi, and to Qatar National Library for the scientific support. And the authors would like to thank the patient for allowing us to share his case.
Statement of Ethics
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report. The case was approved by the medical research center (MRC-04-20-953).
Conflict of Interest Statement
All authors have no conflict of interest.
Funding Sources
Qatar National Library.
Author Contributions
Hawraa Shwaylia: writing, editing, and final approval. Elrazi Ali: writing, editing, and final approval. Mohamed Yassin: writing, editing, and final approval.