Nivolumab plus ipilimumab combined therapy is one of the promising drugs that enhance the anti- immune response in patients with advanced melanoma. Therefore, to increase its response rate is of great interest to dermatologists. Recent reports suggested that, since CD8+ T cells after the administration of ICIs increase the RANKL expression to induce an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment in melanoma, denosumab might enhance the anti-tumor effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as nivolumab and ipilimumab. In this report, we present a case of multiple metastatic melanoma with nivolumab, ipilimumab plus denosumab combined therapy.

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab combined therapy is one of the promising drugs that enhance the anti- immune response in patients with advanced melanoma [1], and is recommended by the NCCN guidelines for cutaneous melanoma as a first-line therapy [2] in spites of its high toxicity. Although BRAF inhibitor combo is also recommended by the NCCN guidelines as a first-line for BRAF mutated advanced melanoma [2], its efficacy is limited in advanced melanoma with multiple organ metastases [3].

Denosumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody to RANKL, has been permitted for the treatment of metastatic bone tumors [4], and is reported to enhance the anti-tumor effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors [5]. In this report, we present a case of multiple metastatic melanoma with nivolumab, ipilimumab plus denosumab combined therapy.

A 70-year-old Japanese man visited our outpatient clinic with a 3-month history of multiple lung metastasis of melanoma. He had undergone resection for malignant melanoma on the back 15 years before, and had been followed up in our clinics for 10 years without any recurrence of the tumor. Five years after our follow-up period, an abnormal shadow of the lung was pointed out in a regular health check-up. Then, he consulted a respiratory physician. Computed tomography (CT) showed multiple lung and pleural nodules, and hilar and mediastinal lymph node swelling. Biopsy from the mediastinal lymph node showed markedly atypical melanocytes (Fig. 1a) that were positive for S-100 (Fig. 1b), Melan A, HMB45, RANK (Fig. 1c) and RANKL (Fig. 1d). From the above findings, the diagnosis was multiple metastatic melanoma in the lung. At his initial visit, we performed positron emission tomography (PET-CT), which revealed cervical (C3) and rib metastasis in addition to lung (Fig. 1e), pleural and lymph node metastases (Fig. 1f). The serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level was in the upper limit of the normal range (222 U/L). The THxID kit revealed that the metastatic lymph node tumor possessed the BRAFV600E mutation. In addition, the serum level of CXCL5 was 811.8 ng/mL. Since the patient had metastases in 4 organs (>3 organs), suggesting that dabrafenib plus trametinib combined therapy might not be effective 3, nivolumab (80 mg/body/every three weeks) was given in combination with ipilimumab (3 mg/kg/every three weeks) for 4 cycles. In addition, since this patient showed metastatic melanoma of the bone, we administered denosumab 120 mg every month. The increased levels of soluble (s)CD163 at 6 weeks was 20.54 (ng/mL). We administered prednisolone (10∼30 mg/day) for the treatment of uveitis (G2) and skin rash (G2) one month after the initial administration. Follow-up PET-CT two months after the combination therapy suggested significant regression of the lung nodules (Fig. 1g), pleural nodules, lymph nodes and bone metastases. Three months after the final administration of this combined therapy, these metastatic nodules remained regressed, and there were no immune-related adverse events except for uveitis (G2) and skin rash (G2).

Fig. 1.

Biopsy from mediastinal lymph node: markedly atypical melanocytes (a), which were positive for S-100 (b), RANK (c) and RANKL (d). Multiple lung metastases (e), pleural, lymph node metastases, and bone metastases on PET-CT at initial visit (f). After treatment, the multiple lung metastases had decreased (g).

Fig. 1.

Biopsy from mediastinal lymph node: markedly atypical melanocytes (a), which were positive for S-100 (b), RANK (c) and RANKL (d). Multiple lung metastases (e), pleural, lymph node metastases, and bone metastases on PET-CT at initial visit (f). After treatment, the multiple lung metastases had decreased (g).

Close modal

Recently, pre-clinical reports suggested that the receptor of activated nuclear factor kappa B ligand (RANKL) blockade enhances the therapeutic effects of immune chokepoint inhibitors [5-7]. For example, Ahern et al. reported that the administration of anti-RANKL antibodies (Abs) enhanced the anti-tumor effects of anti-PD1 Abs plus anti-CTLA4 Abs by the suppression of RANKL+ PD1highCD8 T cells in a B16F10 mouse melanoma model [6]. In another report, anti-RANKL Abs enhanced the therapeutic effects of ipilimumab in the terminal stage of metastatic melanoma patients [7]. In a mouse model, co-administration of anti-RANKL Abs with anti-CTLA4 Abs enhanced CD8 mediated anti-tumor immune response in B16F10 melanoma [8]. These reports suggested that anti-RANKL Abs, denosumab, might enhance the anti-melanoma effects of ipilimumab with or without nivolumab.

RANK and its ligand RANKL are critically involved in metastasis formation in breast, prostate or renal cancer [4]. In addition, Kupas et al. reported that the RANK expression on melanoma cells is increased in parallel with tumor progression [9]. Moreover, not only tumor cells, but also tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) and Langerhans cells express RANK [10, 11], and RANK/ RANKL signaling increases the production of immunosuppressive chemokines such as CCL17 [12]. These reports suggested that the blockade of RANK/ RANKL signaling in advanced melanoma might be useful to improve the tumor microenvironment in advanced melanoma.

In this report, we present a case of multiple metastatic melanoma treated with nivolumab, ipilimumab plus denosumab combined therapy. Although this case presented high baseline levels of CXCL5, suggesting a response to anti-PD1 Abs monotherapy [13], we selected nivolumab plus ipilimumab combined therapy with denosumab because of other prognostic factors at baseline (metastases in 4 organs). As we predicted by our biomarker systems, the increased levels of soluble (s)CD163 at 6 weeks suggested an effective response to anti-PD1 Abs based therapy [14]. Indeed, PET-CT at 3 months after the initial treatment revealed a partial response to this combined therapy. Since a previous clinical study suggested that the response rate of dabrafenib plus trametinib combined therapy in patients with advanced melanoma with multiple organ metastases is limited [3], we selected nivolumab plus ipilimumab combined therapy in the present case. Since we present only a single case, further cases and phase II clinical trial are needed to evaluate the efficacy of this combined therapy.

The patient gave written informed consent. The protocol for this human study was approved by the ethics committee of Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan (Permit No: 2017–1-064). All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

The authors have no conflicting interests to declare.

This study was supported in part by the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (19cm0106434h0002).

Fujimura T designed the research study. Yoshida S, Fujimura T, Kambayashi Y, Amagai R and Hashimoto A treated the patients and acquired the clinical data and samples. Fujimura T gathered and analyzed the ELISA data. Fujimura T wrote the manuscript. Fujimura T and Aiba S supervised the study.

1.
Wolchok
JD
,
Chiarion-Sileni
V
,
Gonzalez
R
,
Rutkowski
P
,
Grob
JJ
,
Cowey
CL
, et al.
Overall Survival with Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma
.
N Engl J Med
.
2017
Oct
;
377
(
14
):
1345
56
.
[PubMed]
0028-4793
2.
NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology
. (NCCN GuidelinesⓇ) Melanoma Version 2.2019-March 12, 2019 https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/cutaneous_melanoma.pdf. In.
2019
.
3.
Long
GV
,
Flaherty
KT
,
Stroyakovskiy
D
,
Gogas
H
,
Levchenko
E
,
de Braud
F
, et al.
Dabrafenib plus trametinib versus dabrafenib monotherapy in patients with metastatic BRAF V600E/K-mutant melanoma: long-term survival and safety analysis of a phase 3 study
.
Ann Oncol
.
2017
Jul
;
28
(
7
):
1631
9
.
[PubMed]
0923-7534
4.
Azim
H
,
Azim
HA
 Jr
.
Targeting RANKL in breast cancer: bone metastasis and beyond
.
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther
.
2013
Feb
;
13
(
2
):
195
201
.
[PubMed]
1473-7140
5.
Angela
Y
,
Haferkamp
S
,
Weishaupt
C
,
Ugurel
S
,
Becker
JC
,
Oberndörfer
F
, et al.
Combination of denosumab and immune checkpoint inhibition: experience in 29 patients with metastatic melanoma and bone metastases
.
Cancer Immunol Immunother
.
2019
Jul
;
68
(
7
):
1187
94
.
[PubMed]
0340-7004
6.
Ahern
E
,
Harjunpää
H
,
O’Donnell
JS
,
Allen
S
,
Dougall
WC
,
Teng
MW
, et al.
RANKL blockade improves efficacy of PD1-PD-L1 blockade or dual PD1-PD-L1 and CTLA4 blockade in mouse models of cancer
.
OncoImmunology
.
2018
Feb
;
7
(
6
):
e1431088
.
[PubMed]
2162-4011
7.
Smyth
MJ
,
Yagita
H
,
McArthur
GA
.
Combination Anti-CTLA-4 and Anti-RANKL in Metastatic Melanoma
.
J Clin Oncol
.
2016
Apr
;
34
(
12
):
e104
6
.
[PubMed]
0732-183X
8.
Ahern
E
,
Harjunpää
H
,
Barkauskas
D
,
Allen
S
,
Takeda
K
,
Yagita
H
, et al.
Co-administration of RANKL and CTLA4 Antibodies Enhances Lymphocyte-Mediated Antitumor Immunity in Mice
.
Clin Cancer Res
.
2017
Oct
;
23
(
19
):
5789
801
.
[PubMed]
1078-0432
9.
Kupas
V
,
Weishaupt
C
,
Siepmann
D
,
Kaserer
ML
,
Eickelmann
M
,
Metze
D
, et al.
RANK is expressed in metastatic melanoma and highly upregulated on melanoma-initiating cells
.
J Invest Dermatol
.
2011
Apr
;
131
(
4
):
944
55
.
[PubMed]
0022-202X
10.
Kambayashi
Y
,
Fujimura
T
,
Furudate
S
,
Asano
M
,
Kakizaki
A
,
Aiba
S
.
The Possible Interaction between Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor Kappa-B Ligand Expressed by Extramammary Paget Cells and its Ligand on Dermal Macrophages
.
J Invest Dermatol
.
2015
Oct
;
135
(
10
):
2547
50
.
[PubMed]
0022-202X
11.
Fujimura
T
,
Kambayashi
Y
,
Furudate
S
,
Kakizaki
A
,
Hidaka
T
,
Aiba
S
.
Possible mechanisms of the crosstalk between Langerhans cells and regulatory T cells in extramammary Paget disease by receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B (RANK) ligand/RANK pathways
.
Br J Dermatol
.
2017
Feb
;
176
(
2
):
387
94
.
[PubMed]
0007-0963
12.
Fujimura
T
,
Kambayashi
Y
,
Furudate
S
,
Asano
M
,
Kakizaki
A
,
Aiba
S
.
Receptor Activator of NF-κB Ligand Promotes the Production of CCL17 from RANK+ M2 Macrophages
.
J Invest Dermatol
.
2015
Nov
;
135
(
11
):
2884
7
.
[PubMed]
0022-202X
13.
Fujimura
T
,
Sato
Y
,
Tanita
K
,
Lyu
C
,
Kambayashi
Y
,
Amagai
R
, et al.
Association of baseline serum levels of CXCL5 with the efficacy of nivolumab in advanced melanoma
.
Front Med (Lausanne)
.
2019
Apr
;
6
:
86
.
[PubMed]
2296-858X
14.
Fujimura
T
,
Sato
Y
,
Tanita
K
,
Kambayashi
Y
,
Otsuka
A
,
Fujisawa
Y
, et al.
Serum level of soluble CD163 may be a predictive marker of the effectiveness of nivolumab in patients with advanced cutaneous melanoma
.
Front Oncol
.
2018
Nov
;
8
:
530
.
[PubMed]
2234-943X
Open Access License / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC). Usage and distribution for commercial purposes requires written permission. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.