In the last couple of decades, breast conservation therapy, which utilizes a combination of surgery, radiotherapy, and endocrine or chemotherapy, has become the standard of care for treating early-stage breast cancer. This practice has been greatly beneficial in the improvement of the patient’s quality of life but has also led to the increased use of radiotherapy and associated soft-tissue sarcomas, with angiosarcoma being the most common malignancy. Radiation-associated angiosarcoma (RAS) of the breast is a rare phenomenon, which has been reported to occur in approximately 0.9 out of 1,000 cases, with a reported onset as late as 23 years following radiotherapy. Here we report 2 cases of RAS that occurred within 6 and 13 years following radiotherapy of their primary breast lesion. We discuss the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges regarding this disease and review the current literature. This case report serves as cautionary lessons on the importance of considering RAS of the breast in the differential diagnosis during evaluation for recurrent breast neoplasms. Ongoing clinical trials using combinations of vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors and chemotherapy may provide future avenues of treatment for this difficult-to-treat disease.

In the last 20 years, breast conservation therapy, which utilizes a combination of surgery, radiotherapy, and endocrine or chemotherapy, has become the standard of care for treating early-stage breast cancer. This practice has been greatly beneficial in the improvement of the patient’s quality of life but has also led to the increased use of radiotherapy. Unfortunately, this has also led to a reported increase in radiotherapy-associated soft-tissue sarcomas, with angiosarcoma being the most common malignancy [1, 2]. Radiation-associated angiosarcoma (RAS) of the breast is a rare phenomenon, which has been reported to occur in approximately 0.9 out of 1,000 cases, with a reported onset as late as 23 years following radiotherapy [1-5]. Here we report 2 cases of RAS that occurred within 6 and 13 years following radiotherapy of their primary breast lesion. We discuss the diagnostic and therapeutic challenges regarding this disease and review the current literature. This case report serves as cautionary lessons on the importance of considering RAS of the breast in the differential diagnosis during evaluation for recurrent breast neoplasms.

Case 1

A 68-year-old female was diagnosed with stage II (T1N1M0) invasive ductal carcinoma, which was estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) positive. She was treated with a right breast partial mastectomy followed by adjuvant radiotherapy and 5 years of endocrine therapy with an aromatase inhibitor as the patient refused chemotherapy. Six years after initial diagnosis, the patient developed multiple red papules on the inferior portion of her right breast with an initial biopsy showing atypical postradiation cells. Due to concern for possible recurrence of her breast cancer (especially since she had refused adjuvant chemotherapy), a bilateral mastectomy was performed. To our surprise, the surgical pathology results showed low-grade multifocal angiosarcoma centered in the dermis and extending up to 1.1 cm, with multiple nodules of vascular proliferation throughout the dermis and perineural invasion and focal infiltration into the subdermal adipose tissue (Fig. 1a). Two months after mastectomy, a follow-up positron emission tomography and computed tomography scan showed no evidence of residual or active hypermetabolic foci indicative of metastatic disease. After a long discussion with the patient, a decision was made for close surveillance as her poor performance status and multiple medical comorbidities made her an inadequate candidate for adjuvant chemotherapy with various anthracyclines or vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors.

Fig. 1.

Radiation-associated angiosarcoma of the breast. a Case 1 (H&E stain). Low-grade angiosarcoma surrounding an area of perineural invasion with small variable endothelial cells of mild atypia and hyperchromasia. b Case 2 (H&E stain). Vascular spaces are lined by enlarged and hyperchromatic endothelial cells. Specimen is absent of necrotic or mitotic cells, which is consistent with low-grade angiosarcoma.

Fig. 1.

Radiation-associated angiosarcoma of the breast. a Case 1 (H&E stain). Low-grade angiosarcoma surrounding an area of perineural invasion with small variable endothelial cells of mild atypia and hyperchromasia. b Case 2 (H&E stain). Vascular spaces are lined by enlarged and hyperchromatic endothelial cells. Specimen is absent of necrotic or mitotic cells, which is consistent with low-grade angiosarcoma.

Close modal

Case 2

A 44-year-old female was diagnosed with stage II (T1N1M0) invasive ductal carcinoma of the left breast, which was ER/PR negative. She was treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, which was followed by left breast mastectomy, sentinel lymph node dissection, and adjuvant radiotherapy. On surgical pathology, the patient had complete response with only residual ER/PR-negative ductal carcinoma in situ with no residual nodal disease. Of note, genetic testing for BRCA1 and 2 genes did not show any known driver mutations but did show some single nucleotide polymorphisms which were consistent with variation of unknown significance. She received yearly diagnostic mammograms for surveillance which showed only benign disease for 12 years. Then in the 13th year, the patient developed a palpable left breast mass at the mastectomy and radiation site. Ultrasound-guided biopsy was performed, and the pathology showed low-grade angiosarcoma with interanastomosing vascular channels, nuclear atypia, and hyperchromasia (Fig. 1b). The patient then underwent radical excision of the left breast and left chest wall angiosarcoma. As of the time of submission, the patient’s follow-up computed tomography scans have shown no evidence of recurrent disease.

Angiosarcoma following the treatment of breast cancer was first described more than 50 years ago in 1948 as a surgical complication from radical mastectomy and axillary lymph node dissection [3]. More recently, radiotherapy has been found to be a significant risk factor associated with secondary soft tissue sarcomas and in particular angiosarcoma [1, 2]. Not only is RAS of the breast rare, but it remains a challenge to diagnose and treat [1, 2]. Mery et al. [6] reviewed the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (NCI SEER) database of early-stage breast cancer patients (approx. 560,000 cases) with up to 15-year follow-up data and estimated that RAS of the breast occurred in 0.9 out of 1,000 cases. Furthermore, they estimated that adjuvant radiotherapy increased the risk of RAS of the breast by 9-fold compared to those who had received no radiation therapy [6]. It was also found that RAS of the breast has a poor prognosis with an overall 5-year survival of 38% [6].

Multiple case reports describe the first signs of RAS of the breast as skin changes including discoloration, dimpling, and thickening [2, 7]. In our first case, the patient presented with multiple red papules; however, in the second case, the presenting sign was a palpable breast mass which is unusual in the setting of RAS of the breast. RAS of the breast can be difficult to find on mammogram and may only appear as skin thickening. Rarely, angiosarcoma appears as an ill-defined or lobulated mass without calcifications [2]. The lack of radiographic findings was seen with our second patient who had routine yearly mammograms which demonstrated only benign findings. All patients with breast cancer, particularly those who have undergone radiation therapy, require routine follow-up as local recurrence rates can be high. The risk of radiation-induced angiosarcoma is highest 10 years after treatment and remains high for the following 10 years [8]. The prognosis of radiation-induced angiosarcoma is poor and correlates with the time of onset, the age of the patient, and depth of tumor invasion. However, tumor grade is not a prognostic indicator [9, 10].

Treatment for radiation-induced angiosarcoma primarily involves an aggressive surgical approach as this represents the only potential for a cure [10]. In a study which looked at 33 patients, Morgan et al. [5] found that even a standard mastectomy may be inadequate for treatment. They found that complete resection of all radiated tissue as opposed to resection of only the tumor provided a better prognosis and decreased the incidence of recurrence. Additional radiation therapy has been shown to provide little benefit as most radiation-induced angiosarcomas are resistant to any additional radiation therapy [11]. Unfortunately, chemotherapy with anthracyclines/taxanes or surgery has been found to be only minimally effective in angiosarcomas with a reported response rate ranging from 17 to 34% [12, 13].

Another approach currently being investigated is the use of molecularly targeted agents such as VEGF inhibitors. It has been suggested that since angiosarcomas overexpress VEGF at high levels, the use of VEGF inhibitors may be another effective strategy [14, 15]. Agulnik et al. [15] conducted a phase II study of 30 patients to study the efficacy of the VEGF inhibitor bevacizumab for the treatment of metastatic or locally advanced angiosarcoma and epithelioid hemangioendothelioma. They found that 17% of the patients (2 angiosarcoma and 2 epithelioid hemangioendothelioma) had a partial response with 50% of the patients (11 angiosarcoma and 4 epithelioid hemangioendothelioma) showing stable disease with a mean time to progression of 26 weeks [15]. These findings are encouraging and there are several ongoing clinical trials investigating the use of combination therapy with a VEGF inhibitor and other chemotherapy agents (NCT02979899, NCT01462630, NCT02048722).

In conclusion, radiation-induced angiosarcoma is a rare and aggressive disease which presents a potential challenge to the treating physician. Diagnosis can be challenging as it is often missed on mammography and often presents with dermatologic findings. Our patient’s presentation with a palpable breast mass represents a unique and potentially challenging presentation of radiation-induced angiosarcoma of the breast. Although RAS of the breast can be potentially life-threatening, studies have shown that the overall risk of angiosarcoma following radiation therapy does not outweigh the benefits of radiation therapy in the treatment of primary breast cancer [8, 10]. Ongoing clinical trials using combinations of VEGF inhibitors and chemotherapy may provide future avenues of treatment for this difficult-to-treat disease.

The authors have no ethical conflicts to disclose.

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

1.
Cabete
J
,
Lencastre
A
,
Fidalgo
A
,
Lobo
L
,
João
A
,
Serrão
V
.
Postradiation cutaneous angiosarcoma of the breast: a diagnosis to keep in mind
.
Breast J
.
2014
Jan-Feb
;
20
(
1
):
89
90
.
[PubMed]
1075-122X
2.
Glazebrook
KN
,
Magut
MJ
,
Reynolds
C
.
Angiosarcoma of the breast
.
AJR Am J Roentgenol
.
2008
Feb
;
190
(
2
):
533
8
.
[PubMed]
0361-803X
3.
Stewart
FW
,
Treves
N
.
Lymphangiosarcoma in postmastectomy lymphedema; a report of six cases in elephantiasis chirurgica
.
Cancer
.
1948
May
;
1
(
1
):
64
81
.
[PubMed]
0008-543X
4.
Depla
AL
,
Scharloo-Karels
CH
,
de Jong
MA
,
Oldenborg
S
,
Kolff
MW
,
Oei
SB
, et al
Treatment and prognostic factors of radiation-associated angiosarcoma (RAAS) after primary breast cancer: a systematic review
.
Eur J Cancer
.
2014
Jul
;
50
(
10
):
1779
88
.
[PubMed]
0959-8049
5.
Morgan
EA
,
Kozono
DE
,
Wang
Q
,
Mery
CM
,
Butrynski
JE
,
Baldini
EH
, et al
Cutaneous radiation-associated angiosarcoma of the breast: poor prognosis in a rare secondary malignancy
.
Ann Surg Oncol
.
2012
Nov
;
19
(
12
):
3801
8
.
[PubMed]
1068-9265
6.
Mery
CM
,
George
S
,
Bertagnolli
MM
,
Raut
CP
.
Secondary sarcomas after radiotherapy for breast cancer: sustained risk and poor survival
.
Cancer
.
2009
Sep
;
115
(
18
):
4055
63
.
[PubMed]
0008-543X
7.
Billings
SD
,
McKenney
JK
,
Folpe
AL
,
Hardacre
MC
,
Weiss
SW
.
Cutaneous angiosarcoma following breast-conserving surgery and radiation: an analysis of 27 cases
.
Am J Surg Pathol
.
2004
Jun
;
28
(
6
):
781
8
.
[PubMed]
0147-5185
8.
Yap
J
,
Chuba
PJ
,
Thomas
R
,
Aref
A
,
Lucas
D
,
Severson
RK
, et al
Sarcoma as a second malignancy after treatment for breast cancer
.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
.
2002
Apr
;
52
(
5
):
1231
7
.
[PubMed]
0360-3016
9.
D’Angelo
SP
,
Antonescu
CR
,
Kuk
D
,
Qin
L
,
Moraco
N
,
Carvajal
RC
, et al
High-risk features in radiation-associated breast angiosarcomas
.
Br J Cancer
.
2013
Oct
;
109
(
9
):
2340
6
.
[PubMed]
0007-0920
10.
Marchal
C
,
Weber
B
,
de Lafontan
B
,
Resbeut
M
,
Mignotte
H
,
du Chatelard
PP
, et al
Nine breast angiosarcomas after conservative treatment for breast carcinoma: a survey from French comprehensive Cancer Centers
.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
.
1999
Apr
;
44
(
1
):
113
9
.
[PubMed]
0360-3016
11.
Lagrange
JL
,
Ramaioli
A
,
Chateau
MC
,
Marchal
C
,
Resbeut
M
,
Richaud
P
, et al;
Radiation Therapist and Pathologist Groups of the Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer
.
Sarcoma after radiation therapy: retrospective multiinstitutional study of 80 histologically confirmed cases
.
Radiology
.
2000
Jul
;
216
(
1
):
197
205
.
[PubMed]
0033-8419
12.
Arpino
G
,
Wiechmann
L
,
Osborne
CK
,
Schiff
R
.
Crosstalk between the estrogen receptor and the HER tyrosine kinase receptor family: molecular mechanism and clinical implications for endocrine therapy resistance
.
Endocr Rev
.
2008
Apr
;
29
(
2
):
217
33
.
[PubMed]
0163-769X
13.
Maki
RG
,
Wathen
JK
,
Patel
SR
,
Priebat
DA
,
Okuno
SH
,
Samuels
B
, et al
Randomized phase II study of gemcitabine and docetaxel compared with gemcitabine alone in patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcomas: results of sarcoma alliance for research through collaboration study 002 [corrected]
.
J Clin Oncol
.
2007
Jul
;
25
(
19
):
2755
63
.
[PubMed]
0732-183X
14.
Itakura
E
,
Yamamoto
H
,
Oda
Y
,
Tsuneyoshi
M
.
Detection and characterization of vascular endothelial growth factors and their receptors in a series of angiosarcomas
.
J Surg Oncol
.
2008
Jan
;
97
(
1
):
74
81
.
[PubMed]
0022-4790
15.
Agulnik
M
,
Yarber
JL
,
Okuno
SH
,
von Mehren
M
,
Jovanovic
BD
,
Brockstein
BE
, et al
An open-label, multicenter, phase II study of bevacizumab for the treatment of angiosarcoma and epithelioid hemangioendotheliomas
.
Ann Oncol
.
2013
Jan
;
24
(
1
):
257
63
.
[PubMed]
0923-7534
Open Access License / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC). Usage and distribution for commercial purposes requires written permission. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.