Dissections of the cervical arteries cause about 20% of total juvenile strokes. Approximately 4% of the carotid artery dissections are due to a (poly)trauma such as car accidents. Despite improved diagnostic facilities, traumatic dissections are often underdiagnosed or diagnosed too late due to a lack of awareness of potential initial signs and symptoms.We report here a case of a delayed embolic stroke after a car accident caused by a dissection of the carotid artery and subsequent pseudoaneurysm.To reduce the long-term morbidity or mortality of multiple trauma patients, an early detection of cervical carotid and vertebral dissections is strictly necessary.

A stroke until the age of 45 [12] is called ‘juvenile cerebral infarction’. In contrast to strokes in the elderly, juvenile strokes are often caused by rare pathologies [1], including dissections of the brain-supplying arteries, paradoxical embolism and thrombophilias [12]. Cervical dissections are the most frequent singular cause of juvenile strokes [2] and account for approximately 20% of acute strokes in young patients [13]. The majority of dissections occur spontaneously. In some cases they are acquired on the basis of connective tissue disease (e.g. Marfan, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome) or other predisposing factors [1,12]. A specific constellation is a dissection of the brain-supplying arteries due to a trauma. Traumatic craniocervical dissections result from excessive speed, rotating or lash-like head movements, such as falls [5], car accidents [5] or other mild traumas [12]. Traumatic dissections are often diagnosed too late due to a lack of awareness of potential initial signs. Results of occurrence of cervical artery dissections after a trauma differ in several studies. The incidence of dissections of the internal carotid artery after a trauma ranges from 0.08 to 3.7% [9]. There are no reliable data for traumatic dissected vertebral arteries. It can be ensured more than half of the patients with dissections suffer from delayed cerebral infarctions or transient ischemic episodes. Over 80% of these events occur within the first week after onset of symptoms. The rest occur partially up to a month later [4], some by formation of pseudoaneurysms and subsequent embolism [8]. Pseudoaneurysms develop in 20–40% of the cases [4]. Clinical predictors of possible dissections of the carotid arteries include visible skull fractures, e.g. Le Fort type II and III and diffuse brain injuries (Glasgow Coma Scale of <6) [3]. Furthermore, strangulating traces by a seat belt injury [15], cervical swelling, cervical sounds under auscultation, expanding cervical hematomas, or focal neurological deficits (particularly painful Horner’s syndrome) [12] are suspicious.

A 16-year-old patient suffered from injuries sustained in a car accident by a collision with another vehicle. His car veered into the opposite lane. After the accident the patient was briefly muzzy, but not unconscious. There were multiple contusions and bruises, including the left knee, the chest (seat belt injury) and the left neck. A massive hematoma with severe restriction of movement was found in the left leg. In hospital, a concussion, a cervical spine sprain and multiple bruises were diagnosed. The patient was discharged after five days. Three months later, the patient came to our hospital emergency department after he suddenly developed a sensorimotor hemiparesis on the right. The clinical diagnosis of a stroke was made. The MRI showed an embolic infarction of the left anterior basal ganglia and the left internal capsule (fig. 1) due to a pseudoaneurysm of the left internal carotid artery (fig. 2, fig. 3). We started oral anticoagulation with phenprocoumon for 6 months to prevent further thromboembolic events. Over the course of one month the patient displayed an almost complete recovery with remaining mild facial palsy on the right.

Fig. 1

Diagnostic imaging (MRI): transverse plane through the brain to the lateral ventricles. The T2-weighted FLAIR image shows an infarction of the left anterior basal ganglia and internal capsule (arrow).

Fig. 1

Diagnostic imaging (MRI): transverse plane through the brain to the lateral ventricles. The T2-weighted FLAIR image shows an infarction of the left anterior basal ganglia and internal capsule (arrow).

Close modal
Fig. 2

The TOF (time of flight) MR angiography reveals a pseudoaneurysm (arrow) of the left distal carotid artery.

Fig. 2

The TOF (time of flight) MR angiography reveals a pseudoaneurysm (arrow) of the left distal carotid artery.

Close modal
Fig. 3

Enlarged view of the pseudoaneurysm of the left internal carotid artery (left figure). The pseudoaneurysm (arrow) has connection to the vascular system (crescent-shaped white structure).

Fig. 3

Enlarged view of the pseudoaneurysm of the left internal carotid artery (left figure). The pseudoaneurysm (arrow) has connection to the vascular system (crescent-shaped white structure).

Close modal

In the present case, signs of a traumatic cervical artery dissection immediately after the accident were overlooked. In the acute setting, focal neurological deficits were absent. An expanding cervical hematoma was initially documented and primarily attributed to a typical seat belt injury. Targeted investigations of the brain-supplying arteries were not done, resulting in the serious complication of a stroke in the region of the basal ganglia, occurring with a time lag of three months.

This case illustrates the importance of awareness for clinical signs of cervical artery dissections after a polytrauma, especially as we know about the high incidence of trauma in the groups of younger-aged and middle-aged patients [10] and the known coincidence between polytrauma and stroke [3]. An incalculable factor is a delayed rupture of the intramural hematoma, which can lead to subsequent embolism by the formation of pseudoaneurysms [8]. There exists no special therapeutic guideline for traumatic cervical artery dissection of patients with polytrauma. The medical treatment of traumatic cervical artery dissection is similar to spontaneous cervical artery dissections. In the acute phase of an ischemia as a result of a cervical artery dissection, a systemic thrombolysis is a possible therapeutic strategy according to stroke guidelines [1,7]. However, the balance between beneficial effects and side effects of thrombolysis in patients with polytrauma must carefully be considered.

No randomized data exist for the use of local thrombolysis in such cases. Even more important is the initiation of an appropriate preventive strategy to avoid thromboembolic complications caused by the dissected artery. Different studies show that both antiplatelets and anticoagulation are effective without any clear advantage for one of the two therapies [6]. It has been proposed that an induced hypertension or an endovascular intervention for improving perfusion is justified in single cases. [4] According to guidelines [1,4], it is suggested to start with heparin followed by an anticoagulation therapy for 3–24 months. A long-term treatment with aspirin is recommended because the risk of an ischemic complication in the future is not predictable. In chronic stage after 6 months of anticoagulation, if an aneurysms or a high-grade carotid stenosis persisted or have newly developed, a surgical intervention could be considered to prevent further ischemic events [11,14]. In the present case we recommended continuing the oral anticoagulation for 6 months. We agreed a check-up 6 months after discharge with an imaging control to discuss the further procedure.

In summary, multiple trauma patients have an almost 4% risk of a cervical internal carotid artery dissection. To reduce the long-term morbidity or mortality of multiple trauma patients, an early detection of cervical carotid and vertebral dissections is strictly necessary. Diagnosis must particularly be precluded by the presence of skull fractures [3] or when a cervical sound is noticed under auscultation, or an expanding cervical hematoma or other focal neurological symptoms (especially Horner’s syndrome) exist [12].

The authors have nothing to disclose.

1.
Brott TG, Halperin JL, Abbara S, Bacharach JM, Barr JD, Bush RL, Cates CU, Creager MA, Fowler SB, Friday G, Hertzberg VS, McIff EB, Moore WS, Panagos PD, Riles TS, Rosenwasser RH, Taylor AJ: Guideline on the Management of Patients With Extracranial Carotid and Vertebral Artery Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American Stroke Association, American Association of Neuroscience Nurses, American Association of Neurological Surgeons, American College of Radiology, American Society of Neuroradiology, Congress of Neurological Surgeons, Society of Atherosclerosis Imaging and Prevention, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery, Society for Vascular Medicine, and Society for Vascular Surgery. Circulation 2011;124:e54–e130.
2.
Baumgartner RW, Arnold M, Baumgartner I, Mosso M, Gönner F, Studer A, Schroth G, Schuknecht B, Sturzenegger M: Carotid dissection with and without ischemic events. Neurology 2001;57:827–832.
3.
Blacker DJ, Wijdicks EFM: Clinical characteristics and mechanisms of stroke after polytrauma. Mayo Clin Proc 2004;79:630–635.
4.
Diener HC (ed): Leitlinien für Diagnostik und Therapie in der Neurologie: Dissektionen hirnversorgender supraaortaler Arterien. Stuttgart, Georg Thieme Verlag, 2008.
5.
Dziewas R, Konrad C, Dräger B, Evers S, Besselmann M, Luedemann P, et al: Cervical artery dissection-clinical features, risk factors, therapy and outcome in 126 patients. J Neurol 2003;250:1179–1184.
6.
Engelter ST, Brandt T, Debette S, Caso V, Lichy C, Pezzini A, Abboud S, Bersano A, Dittrich R, Grond-Ginsbach C, Hausser I, Kloss M, Grau AJ, Tatlisumak T, Leys D, Lyrer PA: Antiplatelets versus anticoagulation in cervical artery dissection. Stroke 2007;38:2605–2611.
7.
Georgiadis D, Baumgartner RW: Thrombolysis in cervical artery dissection. Front Neurol Neurosci 2005;20:140–146.
8.
Guillon B, Brunereau L, Biousse V, Djouhri H, Levy C, Bousser MG: Long-term follow-up of aneurysms developed during extracranial internal carotid artery dissection. Neurology 1999;53:117–122.
9.
Hughes KM, Collier B, Greene KA, Kurek S: Traumatic carotid artery dissection: a significant incidental finding. Am Surg 2000;66:1023–1027.
10.
Lenz M, Bula-Sternberg J, Koch T, Bula P, Bonnaire F: Traumatic dissection of the internal carotid artery following whiplash injury. Diagnostic workup and therapy of an often overlooked but potentially dangerous additional vascular lesion. Unfallchirurg 2012;115:369–376.
11.
Muller BT, Luther B, Hort W, Neumann-Haefelin T, Aulich A, Sandmann W: Surgical treatment of 50 carotid dissections: indications and results. J Vasc Surg 2000;31:980–988.
12.
Nabavi DG, Allroggen A, Ringelstein EB: Der juvenile ischämische Insult. Nervenarzt 2004;75:167–186.
13.
Redekop GJ: Extracranial carotid and vertebral artery dissection: a review. Can J Neurol Sci 2008;35:146–152.
14.
Seth R, Obuchowski AM, Zoarski GH: Endovascular repair of traumatic cervical internal carotid artery injuries: a safe and effective treatment option. AJNR 2012, DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3337.
15.
Teifke A, Degreif J, Geist M, Schild H, Strunk H , Strunk K: Der Sicherheitsgurt: Auswirkungen auf das Verletzungsmuster von Autoinsassen. Fortschr Röntgenstr 1993;159:278–283.
Open Access License / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Open Access License: This is an Open Access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported license (CC BY-NC) (www.karger.com/OA-license), applicable to the online version of the article only. Distribution permitted for non-commercial purposes only.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.