Background/Aims: Psychological conditions are increasingly linked with cardiovascular disorders. We aimed to examine the association between psychological distress and hypertension. Methods: We used data from the National Health Interview Survey for 2004-2013. Hypertension was self-reported and the 6-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale was used to assess psychological distress (a score ≥13 indicated distress). We used a logistic regression model to test the assumption that hypertension was associated with psychological distress. Results: Among the study participants completing the survey (n = 288,784), 51% were female; the overall mean age (±SEM) was 35.3 ± 0.02 years and the mean body mass index was 27.5 ± 0.01. In the entire sample, the prevalence of psychological distress was 3.2%. The adjusted odds of reporting hypertension in psychologically distressed individuals was 1.53 (95% CI = 1.31-1.80, p = 0.01). Conclusion: The findings suggest that psychological distress is associated with higher odds of hypertension after adjusting for other risk factors for high blood pressure. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and to elucidate the mechanisms by which stress increases hypertension risk.

Hypertension contributes significantly to systemic organ damage, disability and premature death. Globally, it is linked with 7.6 million deaths (about 13.5% of the total) and 92 million disability-adjusted life years [1]. The annual cost of treating hypertension including that for office visits, home health visits, prescription medicines, and hospital emergency room and inpatient visits is currently in excess of USD 45 billion and increasing [2,3].

Some evidence links psychological factors with hypertension. In a study of US veterans, Carroll et al. [4] showed that hypertension was positively associated with general anxiety disorders and major depressive disorders. This association was further increased for individuals experiencing both general anxiety disorders and major depressive disorders [4]. In a longitudinal study of Canadian participants, individuals who had major depression at baseline had a 60% higher risk of developing hypertension [5]. Other studies demonstrate psychological factors as important etiological drivers for the development of hypertension [6,7,8].

Kessler et al. [9] suggest serious psychological illness, measured by the 6-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K6), as a tool for identifying any mental illness that is sufficient to cause moderate-to-serious impairment in social, occupational, or school functioning. The K6 is a well-validated measure of psychological symptoms [9,10]. It could also be used as a mental health screening instrument in the primary care health setting [11,12]. However, there is a dearth of information on the role of psychological distress and the occurrence of hypertension in the US at the national level.

The goal of this investigation was to determine the associations between psychological stress measured by the K6 index and hypertension.

Study Population

The study used data from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) for the years 2004-2013. The NHIS is a cross-sectional in-person household interview survey of noninstitutionalized representatives of the US civilian population conducted annually by the National Center for Health Statistics of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. For the current study, data were collected from 667,878 adult persons (≥18 years) who completed the survey, representing an annual response rate of 60.8-72.5%. From the 667,878 adults who completed the interviews, 288,784 individuals provided valid data on hypertension that could be used for the analysis.

The data set amalgamates data from different samples using a complex multistage probability sampling design. The weights used represent a product of weights for the corresponding units computed in each of the sampling stages. All analyses performed in this study utilized weighted statistics based on the final weights provided with the NHIS data set.

During face-to-face interviews conducted by trained interviewers from the US Census Bureau, volunteers provided sociodemographic data and information about physician-diagnosed chronic conditions. The chronic conditions included hypertension, heart disease, stroke, cancer, diabetes, and rheumatoid arthritis. Surveys were conducted using computer-assisted personal interviewing, which utilizes a computer program for data collection and directs the interviewer through the questionnaire. Details on the NHIS sample design can be found in Parsons et al. [13].

Dependent and Independent Variables

The primary dependent variable for the current investigation was the presence of hypertension. This was based on answers to survey questions, such as ‘Have you EVER been told by a doctor or other health professional that you had hypertension, also called high blood pressure?' Only self-reports of hypertension or high blood pressure that were diagnosed by a doctor or other health care professional were included, thus excluding results from home blood pressure testing or testing by a machine in the mall or other commercial establishment.

The main independent variable was psychological distress measured by the nonspecific K6. The K6 is a simple evaluator of nonspecific psychological distress [9]. It asks about the frequency of 6 symptoms of mental illness: (1) during the past 30 days, how often did you feel so sad that nothing could cheer you up; (2) nervous; (3) restless or fidgety; (4) hopeless; (5) that everything was an effort, and (6) worthless. Based on the K6 scaling system, a score ≥13 indicated psychological distress, and this was referenced to those who reported a cumulative mood index <13 [14]. Internal consistency for the K6 scores has been reported by estimates of Cronbach's α at 0.89 and 0.93 [9,10]. Other independent variables included sociodemographic variables associated with psychological or social stress like age, sex, race, high school completion, poverty status, marital status, earnings and poverty level. Also, the relationships between hypertension and health risk factors like obesity [measured by the body mass index (BMI)], exercise, alcohol use, and smoking were determined. For comorbidities, links between other conditions, such as cancer and stroke, and the primary dependent variable were ascertained. In addition, the study assessed socioeconomic stress factors that may influence hypertension, including poverty status, total annual income, and income-to-poverty ratio. To determine the poverty status, the reported total family income was compared to the US Census Bureau's poverty thresholds for the year in question. These thresholds are based not only on income but also on family size and the number of children under the age of 18 years. For families where the number of children under the age of 18 years in the family is equivalent to the number of family members, family income is presumed to be nonexistent, and the ratio of such nonexistent income to the poverty line is undefinable.

Statistical Analysis

The present analyses focused on addressing differences between black and white Americans. Applying survey procedures, frequency and measures of central tendency were used to describe the sample, accounting for the complex sample design of the NHIS survey.

Demographics for the studied population, Blacks and Whites, with and without psychological distress within the previous 30 days are outlined in the tables. Crude and age-adjusted prevalence rates of psychological distress were determined for each sociodemographic, health risk, and associated comorbidity. Proportions and means were reported for each characteristic of interest. In preliminary analyses, the Student t test and ANOVA were used for group mean comparison, and the χ2 test was employed to assess differences in categorical variables. To test the hypothesis that psychological distress (mood index score ≥13) was associated with hypertension (BMI ≥30), multivariate logistic regression modeling was applied. In the first model, the association of psychological distress with hypertension was assessed while adjusting effects of age and sex alone. In the 2nd to 4th models, associations of hypertension with psychological distress were ascertained while adjusting effects of covariates. Covariates entered in the models were: age, sex, income, smoking and drinking history, depression, and a history of hypertension, cancer, and stroke. Before constructing the model, univariate logistic regressions were performed to assess associations between hypothesized predictors and the dependent variable. Two-tailed tests with p values <0.05 were considered significant. All analyses were performed using SAS version 9.3 for Windows (SAS Inc., Cary, N.C., USA).

Prevalence of Psychological Distress

The study sample comprised 55.7% females, 61.4% (n = 175,428) non-Hispanic Whites, 15.4% (n = 44,115) non-Hispanic Blacks, 5.3% (n = 15,187) Asians, and 17.9% (n = 51,108) Hispanics. Participants of other races representing <5% of the study sample were excluded from the analysis.

The prevalence of psychological distress in the US adult population was 3.2% over the 10 years from 2004 to 2013. Blacks had a higher rate of psychological distress (table 1). The rates were highest in middle-aged adults aged 45-64 years (4.6%), lower in younger adults (3.1%) and lowest in adults 65 years of age and over (2.4%) (fig. 1). Psychological distress also occurred more frequently among women (4.2%) than among men (2.9%) (fig. 2). The prevalence of hypertension was 30.8%. Hypertension was highest among Blacks (37.9%), compared to Whites (31.3%), Asians (21.5%), and Hispanics (21.5%; p < 0.01).

Table 1

Comparison of the study population's sociodemographics by psychological stress

Comparison of the study population's sociodemographics by psychological stress
Comparison of the study population's sociodemographics by psychological stress
Fig. 1

Crude prevalence of psychological distress by race and age category.

Fig. 1

Crude prevalence of psychological distress by race and age category.

Close modal
Fig. 2

Crude prevalence of psychological distress by sex and age category.

Fig. 2

Crude prevalence of psychological distress by sex and age category.

Close modal

We also assessed the odds ratio of hypertension by psychological distress when stratifying the groups defined by sex, BMI, or stroke on the likelihood for hypertension (table 2). From the evaluation of interaction effects (online suppl. table 4a-c; for all online suppl. material, see www.karger.com/doi/10.1159/000443933), we found that psychological distress and sex, BMI, or stroke conditions had significant interaction effects on hypertension. This means that depending on sex, or various levels of BMI and stroke, the association between psychological distress and hypertension was different. Thus, when considered separately, the likelihood of having hypertension when psychologically distressed was significant for men, but not for women. Therefore, it appeared that psychological distress occurred more frequently in women, but was more importantly associated with hypertension in men.

Table 2

Odds ratio (95% CI) for the likelihood of hypertension by psychological distress for groups defined by sex, BMI, and stroke

Odds ratio (95% CI) for the likelihood of hypertension by psychological distress for groups defined by sex, BMI, and stroke
Odds ratio (95% CI) for the likelihood of hypertension by psychological distress for groups defined by sex, BMI, and stroke

Stratification by BMI showed that there were higher rates of hypertension among obese/psychologically distressed and obese/non-psychologically distressed adults than among the other BMI groups. Psychological distress was associated with hypertension among normal-weight, overweight, and obese adults, all in the same direction.

Participants with a history of stroke had significantly higher rates of hypertension than participants without a history of stroke. This observation was similar for both psychologically distressed and non-psychologically distressed adults, perhaps due to a progression of vascular dysfunction seen in hypertension-related strokes. When we stratified by history of stroke, psychological distress had a stronger association with hypertension among individuals with a history of stroke than among those without.

Association Findings

In all the models (adjusted for age and sex), psychological distress was significantly associated with hypertension (table 3). For survey respondents, decreasing economic distress exhibited by an increasing income-to-poverty ratio was associated with a corresponding reduction in the odds of hypertension. The multivariate analyses showed that psychologically distressed individuals had 49% greater odds of being hypertensive, relative to nondistressed patients. The attenuation of the results after multivariate adjustment indicates that associations of psychological distress and hypertension were significantly affected by several factors. These included obesity (BMI ≥30), age (≥65 years), unemployment in the previous 12 months, widow status, past history of alcohol drinking, a history of cancer, as well as a history of stroke.

Table 3

Associations between psychological distress and hypertension using logistic regression

Associations between psychological distress and hypertension using logistic regression
Associations between psychological distress and hypertension using logistic regression

This study shows links between psychological and hypertensive disease. This is an important issue because mental health symptoms are very common in the US, and nearly 50% of all adults will develop at least one mental illness during their lifetime [11]. About 3.2% of the studied participants were determined to be psychologically distressed. Higher rates in women and Blacks suggest a higher psychological symptom burden among women and black populations. However, men with psychological distress were more likely to report hypertension (table 4). Several studies show that major depression and anxiety states are much more common in women than in men [15,16,17]. However, in men, stressful conditions could be linked to alcohol and smoking habits as a potential coping measure [15,18].

Table 4

Hypertension rate stratified by sex and psychological distress

Hypertension rate stratified by sex and psychological distress
Hypertension rate stratified by sex and psychological distress

The current study also shows that psychologically distressed persons are more likely to live below the poverty line, or at least report a lower annual income. This is consistent with other studies that demonstrate striking associations between poverty and mental disease [19,20,21,22,23]. Tampubolon and Hanandita [22] showed that a 1% reduction in per capita household expenditure is associated with a corresponding increase in depressive symptoms. Many individuals who become unemployed or experience dynamic levels of job insecurity and economic deprivations/wealth loss may encounter significant reductions in mental health scores, increased psychological stress, and an increase in the use of antidepressant medications [19,20,21].

The findings from this study are particularly noteworthy as individuals with nonspecific psychological stress were 1.5 times as likely to suffer from hypertension as individuals without psychological stress. An earlier study using the K6 observed higher rates of hypertension among individuals with psychological distress (39.2%) compared to those without (24.2%) [12]. Another longitudinal study of black South Africans, normotensive at baseline, showed that psychological distress was associated with twice the risk for future development of hypertension [24]. In a related cross-sectional study of hypertension across 9 countries (Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Russia and Ukraine), Footman et al. [25] found a significant association between psychological distress (measured using the 12-item distress component of the Living Conditions, Lifestyles and Health Project) and hypertension with an odds ratio of 2.27 (95% CI 1.91-2.70).

Basic science studies have provided evidence that disruptions of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis occurring in chronic stress response may be involved in the pathophysiology of essential hypertension [26,27]. With lower odds for female participants, hypertension-related, chronic hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis reactivity may be more important for males [28]. Moreover, the study results also mirror conclusions reached by other studies, which demonstrate higher rates of cardiovascular disease among patients with psychiatric symptoms [29,30,31,32,33].

The burden of psychological health on hypertension or hypertension-related morbidity cannot be overstated. Poor mental health hygiene is associated with deficient health belief/perception, inadequate utilization of health care, and improper smoking/alcohol habits [34,35]. A person's mental health status critically affects his/her ability to maintain a healthy lifestyle, seek early treatment of comorbid conditions, or consistently adhere to treatment programs [36,37]. In supporting the evidence for emotional stress and hypertension, the study strengthens the literature surrounding the behavioral aspects of hypertension.

Finally, interaction results show that psychological distress had a stronger association with hypertension among men, normal-weight adults, and individuals with a history of stroke when compared to women, overweight or obese adults, and individuals without a history of stroke, respectively.

Limitations of This Study

The NHIS data are largely self-reported, not authenticated by clinical measurement, and, therefore, exposed to recall bias. Some social desirability bias may affect the survey respondents' answers, and there might be the possibility of misclassification bias from categorization of continuous variables. Given that the survey design is cross-sectional, it is challenging to determine the temporality or causality of specific conditions. Also, the possibility exists for unmeasured confounders that affect race and hypertension, for example salt intake, or other genetic variations.

This investigation suggests that psychological and social factors may be important contributors to the current burden of hypertension in the US. The psychological health and hypertension relationship suggests the need for a wider adoption of behavioral care tools as part of a broad approach to facilitating cardiovascular well-being.

This work was supported by funding from the NINDS (U54NS081765) and the NHLBI (K24HL111315). However, the funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

All authors declare that they have no proprietary, financial, professional, nor any other personal interest of any nature or kind in any product or services and/or company that could be construed or considered to be a potential conflict of interest that might have influenced the views expressed in this study. This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

1.
Lawes CM, Vander Hoorn S, Rodgers A; International Society of Hypertension: Global burden of blood-pressure-related disease, 2001. Lancet 2008;371:1513-1518.
2.
Davis K: Expenditures for Hypertension among Adults Age 18 and Older, 2010: Estimates for the US Civilian Noninstitutionalized Population. Statistical Brief No 404. April 2013. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville. http://www.meps.ahrq.gov/mepsweb/data_files/publications/st404/stat404.shtml.
3.
Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, et al: Heart disease and stroke statistics - 2015 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2015;131:e29-e322.
4.
Carroll D, Phillips AC, Gale CR, Batty GD: Generalized anxiety and major depressive disorders, their comorbidity and hypertension in middle-aged men. Psychosom Med 2010;72:16-19.
5.
Patten SB, Williams JV, Lavorato DH, Campbell NR, Eliasziw M, Campbell TS: Major depression as a risk factor for high blood pressure: epidemiologic evidence from a national longitudinal study. Psychosom Med 2009;71:273-279.
6.
Hamer M, Batty GD, Stamatakis E, Kivimaki M: Hypertension awareness and psychological distress. Hypertension 2010;56:547-550.
7.
Ringoir L, Pedersen SS, Widdershoven JW, Pop VJ: Prevalence of psychological distress in elderly hypertension patients in primary care. Neth Heart J 2014;22:71-76.
8.
Footman K, Roberts B, Tumanov S, McKee M: The comorbidity of hypertension and psychological distress: a study of nine countries in the former Soviet Union. J Public Health (Oxf) 2013;35:548-557.
9.
Kessler RC, Andrews G, Colpe LJ, Hiripi E, Mroczek DK, Normand SL, Walters EE, Zaslavsky AM: Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychol Med 2002;32:959-976.
10.
Cornelius BL, Groothoff JW, van der Klink JJ, Brouwer S: The performance of the K10, K6 and GHQ-12 to screen for present state DSM-IV disorders among disability claimants. BMC Public Health 2013;13:128.
11.
Kessler RC, Barker PR, Colpe LJ, Epstein JF, Gfroerer JC, Hiripi E, Howes MJ, Normand SL, Manderscheid RW, Walters EE, Zaslavsky AM: Screening for serious mental illness in the general population. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2003;14:184-189.
12.
Pratt LA, Dey AN, Cohen AJ: Characteristics of adults with serious psychological distress as measured by the K6 scale: United States, 2001-04. Adv Data 2007;(382):1-18.
13.
Parsons VL, Moriarity C, Jonas K, Moore TF, Davis KE, Tompkins L: Design and estimation for the national health interview survey, 2006-2015. Vital Health Stat 2 2014;(165):1-53.
14.
Kessler RC, Green JG, Gruber MJ, Sampson NA, Bromet E, Cuitan M, Furukawa TA, Gureje O, Hinkov H, Hu CY, Lara C, Lee S, Mneimneh Z, Myer L, Oakley-Browne M, Posada-Villa J, Sagar R, Viana MC, Zaslavsky AM: Screening for serious mental illness in the general population with the K6 screening scale: results from the WHO World Mental Health (WMH) survey initiative. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 2010;14(suppl 1):4-22.
15.
Schuch JJ, Roest AM, Nolen WA, Penninx BW, de Jonge P: Gender differences in major depressive disorder: results from the Netherlands study of depression and anxiety. J Affect Disord 2014;156:156-163.
16.
Chou KL, Cheung KC: Major depressive disorder in vulnerable groups of older adults, their course and treatment, and psychiatric comorbidity. Depress Anxiety 2013;30:528-537.
17.
Grant BF, Stinson FS, Hasin DS, Dawson DA, Chou SP, Ruan WJ, Huang B: Prevalence, correlates, and comorbidity of bipolar I disorder and axis I and II disorders: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. J Clin Psychiatry 2005;66:1205-1215.
18.
Foster J, Read D, Karunanithi S, Woodward V: Why do people drink at home? J Public Health (Oxf) 2010;32:512-518.
19.
Meltzer H, Bebbington P, Brugha T, Jenkins R, McManus S, Stansfeld S: Job insecurity, socio-economic circumstances and depression. Psychol Med 2010;40:1401-1407.
20.
McKenzie SK, Imlach Gunasekara F, Richardson K, Carter K: Do changes in socioeconomic factors lead to changes in mental health? Findings from three waves of a population based panel study. J Epidemiol Community Health 2014;68:253-260.
21.
McInerney M, Mellor JM, Nicholas LH: Recession depression: mental health effects of the 2008 stock market crash. J Health Econ 2013;32:1090-1104.
22.
Tampubolon G, Hanandita W: Poverty and mental health in Indonesia. Soc Sci Med 2014;106:20-27.
23.
Regier DA, Farmer ME, Rae DS, Myers JK, Kramer M, Robins LN, George LK, Karno M, Locke BZ: One-month prevalence of mental disorders in the United States and sociodemographic characteristics: the Epidemiologic Catchment Area study. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1993;88:35-47.
24.
Schutte AE, Ware LJ, Huisman HW, Fourie CM, Greeff M, Khumalo T, Wissing MP: Psychological distress and the development of hypertension over 5 years in black South Africans. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2015;17:126-133.
25.
Footman K, Roberts B, Tumanov S, McKee M: The comorbidity of hypertension and psychological distress: a study of nine countries in the former Soviet Union. J Public Health (Oxf) 2013;35:548-557.
26.
Nijm J, Jonasson L: Inflammation and cortisol response in coronary artery disease. Ann Med 2009;41:224-233.
27.
Whitworth JA, Williamson PM, Mangos G, Kelly JJ: Cardiovascular consequences of cortisol excess. Vasc Health Risk Manag 2005;1:291-299.
28.
Traustadóttir T, Bosch PR, Matt KS: Gender differences in cardiovascular and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis responses to psychological stress in healthy older adult men and women. Stress 2003;6:133-140.
29.
Tevie J, Shaya FT: Association between mental health and comorbid obesity and hypertension among children and adolescents in the US. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2015;24:497-502.
30.
Ul-Haq Z, Mackay DF, Pell JP: Association between self-reported general and mental health and adverse outcomes: a retrospective cohort study of 19,625 Scottish adults. PLoS One 2014;9:e93857.
31.
Nakaya N, Kogure M, Saito-Nakaya K, Tomata Y, Sone T, Kakizaki M, Tsuji I: The association between self-reported history of physical diseases and psychological distress in a community-dwelling Japanese population: the Ohsaki Cohort 2006 Study. Eur J Public Health 2014;24:45-49.
32.
Logan JG, Barksdale DJ, Carlson J, Carlson BW, Rowsey PJ: Psychological stress and arterial stiffness in Korean Americans. J Psychosom Res 2012;73:53-58.
33.
Hennekens CH, Hennekens AR, Hollar D, Casey DE: Schizophrenia and increased risks of cardiovascular disease. Am Heart J 2005;150:1115-1121.
34.
Broadbent E, Kydd R, Sanders D, Vanderpyl J: Unmet needs and treatment seeking in high users of mental health services: role of illness perceptions. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2008;42:147-153.
35.
Shen C, Sambamoorthi U, Rust G: Co-occurring mental illness and health care utilization and expenditures in adults with obesity and chronic physical illness. Dis Manag 2008;11:153-160.
36.
Ravenell J, Ogedegbe G: Unconscious bias and real-world hypertension outcomes: advancing disparities research. J Gen Intern Med 2014;29:973-975.
37.
Prince M, Patel V, Saxena S, et al: No health without mental health. Lancet 2007;370:859-877.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.