1-5 of 5
Keywords: DMFS
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Articles
Caries Res (2015) 49 (3): 251–258.
Published Online: 25 March 2015
...Susanne M. Lempert; Lisa B. Christensen; Karsten Froberg; Kyle Raymond; Berit L. Heitmann The aim of this paper was to investigate associations between the intake of dairy products and the development in caries (DMFS, decayed, missing and filled surfaces) among children/adolescents over a period...
Journal Articles
Caries Res (2012) 46 (1): 16–22.
Published Online: 04 January 2012
... to in the content or advertisements. Cariogram DMFS Epidemiology Italy Schoolchildren Caries incidence As the prevalence and severity of dental caries have decreased in Western countries including Italy, it becomes more imperative to commit the limited dental public health resources to those...
Journal Articles
Caries Res (2011) 45 (1): 40–46.
Published Online: 13 January 2011
... smokers. Differences among means were statistically significant for DS, DMFS and Significant Caries Index (p = 0.01, 0.04 and 0.03, respectively). The zero-inflated regression model showed that caries severity was significantly associated with smoking habit (p = 0.02), dental check-up in the past 6 months...
Journal Articles
Caries Res (2002) 36 (3): 170–173.
Published Online: 07 June 2002
... of 1,558 students in 1999. The mean (SD) dmfs/DMFS values were 7.9 (10.7) for the 6-year-old children, 4.1 (4.9) for the 12-year-old students and 8.2 (8.1) for the 15-year-olds; mean (SD) dmft/DMFT scores were 3.2 (3.5), 2.2 (2.1) and 3.8. (3.3), respectively. An Unmet Restorative Index of 88–99.9...
Journal Articles
Caries Res (2000) 34 (2): 159–163.
Published Online: 31 March 2000
...J.H.G. Poorterman; I.H.A. Aartman; J.A. Kieft; H. Kalsbeek The aim of this study was to determine, for different age groups, the additional value of bite–wing radiographs compared to the clinical information, and to calculate the subsequent effect on the DMFS index. Subjects were 14, 17, 20, 23...