The distribution of caries in 301 Iron Age, 412 Roman-British and 416 Mediaeval dentitions was determined and compared with the findings of a previously reported study of the Anglo-Saxon dentition. The principal finding was that the pattern of caries underwent no significant changes during these periods which together extended over more than 2,000 years. The most frequent site of caries initiation in the permanent dentition was at the cemento-enamel junction, particularly on the interstitial surfaces. In the younger skulls, caries was most prevalent in the occlusal fissures but the number of cavities at this site declined with age as attrition removed crown substance. This decline was more than offset by a progressive increase with age in the number of cavities at the cemento-enamel junction. In the Mediaeval period, cavities at contact areas became more prevalent (although not by statistically significant amounts). Whether this presaged the beginning of a trend towards the modern pattern of caries should become obvious from studies now being made of the succeeding periods of British history.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.