This study evaluated the influence of toothbrushing on the antierosive effect of solutions containing sodium fluoride (225 ppm/F), stannous chloride (800 ppm/Sn), sodium linear polyphosphate (2%/LPP), and their combinations, and deionized water as negative control (C). Solutions were tested in a 5-day erosion-remineralization-abrasion cycling model, using enamel and dentin specimens (n = 8). Erosion was performed 6 times/day for 5 min, exposure to the test solutions 3 times/day for 2min, and toothbrushing (or not) with toothpaste slurry 2 times/day for 2 min (45 strokes). Surface loss (SL) was determined by noncontact profilometry. Data were analyzed using three-way ANOVA (α = 0.05). Brushing caused more SL than no brushing for enamel (mean ± SD, in micrometers: 52.7 ± 6.6 and 33.0 ± 4.5, respectively), but not for dentin (28.2 ± 1.9 and 26.6 ± 1.8, respectively). For enamel without brushing, F+LPP+Sn showed the lowest SL (23.8 ± 3.4), followed by F+Sn (30.6 ± 4.9) and F+LPP (31.7 ± 1.7), which did not differ from each other. No differences were found between the other groups and C (37.8 ± 2.1). When brushing, F+LPP+Sn exhibited the lowest SL (36.7 ± 2.4), not differing from F+LPP (39.1 ± 1.8). F, F+Sn and LPP+Sn were similar (46.7 ± 2.9, 42.1 ± 2.8 and 45.3 ± 4.6, respectively) and better than C (52.7 ± 4.3). Sn (55.0 ± 2.4) and LPP (51.0 ± 4.3) did not differ from C. For dentin, neither groups differed from C, regardless of brushing. In conclusion, toothbrushing did not affect the antierosive effect of F+Sn, F+LPP and F+LPP+Sn on enamel, although overall it led to more erosion than nonbrushing. F and LPP+Sn showed a protective effect only under brushing conditions, whereas Sn and LPP did not exhibit any protection. For dentin, neither toothbrushing nor the test solutions influenced the development of erosion.

1.
Babcock FD, King JC, Jordan TH: The reaction of stannous fluoride and hydroxyapatite. J Dent Res 1978;57:933-938.
2.
Baig AF, Faller RV, White DJ Jr: Method of protecting teeth against erosion. US Patent 6685920, 2004.
3.
Barbour ME, Shellis RP, Parker DM, Allen GC, Addy M: An investigation of some food-approved polymers as agents to inhibit hydroxyapatite dissolution. Eur J Oral Sci 2005;113:457-461.
4.
Creeth JE, Kelly SA, Martinez-Mier EA, Hara AT, Bosma ML, Butler A, Lynch RJ, Zero DT: Dose-response effect of fluoride dentifrice on remineralisation and further demineralisation of erosive lesions: a randomised in situ clinical study. J Dent 2015;43:823-831.
5.
da Camara DM, Miyasaki ML, Danelon M, Sassaki KT, Delbem AC: Effect of low-fluoride toothpastes combined with hexametaphosphate on in vitro enamel demineralization. J Dent 2014;42:256-262.
6.
Ganss C, Hardt M, Blazek D, Klimek J, Schlueter N: Effects of toothbrushing force on the mineral content and demineralized organic matrix of eroded dentine. Eur J Oral Sci 2009;117:255-260.
7.
Ganss C, Hardt M, Lussi A, Cocks AK, Klimek J, Schlueter N: Mechanism of action of tin-containing fluoride solutions as anti-erosive agents in dentine - an in vitro tin-uptake, tissue loss, and scanning electron microscopy study. Eur J Oral Sci 2010a;118:376-384.
8.
Ganss C, Lussi A, Grunau O, Klimek J, Schlueter N: Conventional and anti-erosion fluoride toothpastes: effect on enamel erosion and erosion-abrasion. Caries Res 2011;45:581-589.
9.
Ganss C, Lussi A, Schlueter N: Dental erosion as oral disease. Insights in etiological factors and pathomechanisms, and current strategies for prevention and therapy. Am J Dent 2012;25:351-364.
10.
Ganss C, Lussi A, Schlueter N: The histological features and physical properties of eroded dental hard tissues. Monogr Oral Sci 2014;25:99-107.
11.
Ganss C, Neutard L, von Hinckeldey J, Klimek J, Schlueter N: Efficacy of a tin/fluoride rinse: a randomized in situ trial on erosion. J Dent Res 2010b;89:1214-1218.
12.
Ganss C, Schlueter N, Klimek J: Retention of KOH-soluble fluoride on enamel and dentine under erosive conditions - a comparison of in vitro and in situ results. Arch Oral Biol 2007;52:9-14.
13.
Hannig M, Hannig C: The pellicle and erosion. Monogr Oral Sci 2014;25:206-214.
14.
Hara AT, Ando M, Cury JA, Serra MC, Gonzalez-Cabezas C, Zero DT: Influence of the organic matrix on root dentine erosion by citric acid. Caries Res 2005;39:134-138.
15.
Hara AT, Lippert F, Zero DT: Interplay between experimental dental pellicles and stannous-containing toothpaste on dental erosion-abrasion. Caries Res 2013;47:325-329.
16.
Hesaraki S, Zamanian A, Moztarzadeh F: Effect of adding sodium hexametaphosphate liquefier on basic properties of calcium phosphate cements. J Biomed Mater Res A 2009;88:314-321.
17.
Huysmans MC, Young A, Ganss C: The role of fluoride in erosion therapy. Monogr Oral Sci 2014;25:230-243.
18.
Imfeld T: Dental erosion. Definition, classification and links. Eur J Oral Sci 1996;104:151-155.
19.
Lamkin MS, Arancillo AA, Oppenheim FG: Temporal and compositional characteristics of salivary protein adsorption to hydroxyapatite. J Dent Res 1996;75:803-808.
20.
Lendenmann U, Grogan J, Oppenheim FG: Saliva and dental pellicle - a review. Adv Dent Res 2000;14:22-28.
21.
Magalhaes AC, Wiegand A, Rios D, Honorio HM, Buzalaf MA: Insights into preventive measures for dental erosion. J Appl Oral Sci 2009;17:75-86.
22.
Manarelli MM, Vieira AE, Matheus AA, Sassaki KT, Delbem AC: Effect of mouth rinses with fluoride and trimetaphosphate on enamel erosion: an in vitro study. Caries Res 2011;45:506-509.
23.
Mathews MS, Amaechi BT, Ramalingam K, Ccahuana-Vasquez RA, Chedjieu IP, Mackey AC, Karlinsey RL: In situ remineralisation of eroded enamel lesions by NaF rinses. Arch Oral Biol 2012;57:525-530.
24.
Pancote LP, Manarelli MM, Danelon M, Delbem AC: Effect of fluoride gels supplemented with sodium trimetaphosphate on enamel erosion and abrasion: in vitro study. Arch Oral Biol 2014;59:336-340.
25.
Scaramucci T, Borges AB, Lippert F, Frank NE, Hara AT: Sodium fluoride effect on erosion-abrasion under hyposalivatory simulating conditions. Arch Oral Biol 2013;58:1457-1463.
26.
Scaramucci T, Borges AB, Lippert F, Zero DT, Aoki IV, Hara AT: Anti-erosive properties of solutions containing fluoride and different film-forming agents. J Dent 2015;43:458-465.
27.
Scaramucci T, Hara AT, Zero DT, Ferreira SS, Aoki IV, Sobral MA: In vitro evaluation of the erosive potential of orange juice modified by food additives in enamel and dentine. J Dent 2011;39:841-848.
28.
Scaramucci T, Sobral MA, Eckert GJ, Zero DT, Hara AT: In situ evaluation of the erosive potential of orange juice modified by food additives. Caries Res 2012;46:55-61.
29.
Schlueter N, Hardt M, Lussi A, Engelmann F, Klimek J, Ganss C: Tin-containing fluoride solutions as anti-erosive agents in enamel: an in vitro tin-uptake, tissue-loss, and scanning electron micrograph study. Eur J Oral Sci 2009;117:427-434.
30.
Schlueter N, Neutard L, von Hinckeldey J, Klimek J, Ganss C: Tin and fluoride as anti-erosive agents in enamel and dentine in vitro. Acta Odontol Scan 2010;68:180-184.
31.
Stenhagen KR, Hove LH, Holme B, Tveit AB: The effect of daily fluoride mouth rinsing on enamel erosive/abrasive wear in situ. Caries Res 2013;47:2-8.
32.
West NX, Addy M, Newcombe R, Macdonald E, Chapman A, Davies M, Moran J, Claydon N: A randomised crossover trial to compare the potential of stannous fluoride and essential oil mouth rinses to induce tooth and tongue staining. Clin Oral Investig 2012;16:821-826.
33.
Wiegand A, Schneider S, Sener B, Roos M, Attin T: Stability against brushing abrasion and the erosion-protective effect of different fluoride compounds. Caries Res 2014;48:154-162.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.