Although the stepwise excavation procedure (SWP) has been shown to be an effective caries treatment technique, studies reporting its application outside of controlled clinical trials are limited. We performed a retrospective study from patient record data to assess the proportion of patients who had an SWP reevaluated within 18 months at The University of Iowa College of Dentistry (UICOD) between 2004 and 2012, and evaluated the association between different variables and this outcome. A total of 1,985 SWPs were performed in 1,326 patients, with 518 patients having had reevaluation within 18 months. Bivariate analysis and logistic regression modeling revealed strong associations between explanatory variables such as provider type, tooth type, patient age, number of recalls and the calendar year in which the SWP was done and reevaluation status. There was also evidence of association with dental insurance status. Other characteristics such as gender, distance traveled to the UICOD, number of surfaces treated and tooth arch did not show any significant association. In general, patients were more likely to have reevaluation when seen by faculty members or residents, the procedure was performed in molars/pre-molars, they were older, they had more recalls and were seen earlier in the study period. These results suggest that decisions to use SWP should consider patient demographics and treatment characteristics such as provider level, tooth type, patient age and number of recalls. The impact of treatment year may reflect program heterogeneity or temporal changes in external societal factors.

Keywords:
Caries removal, Dental caries, Patient compliance, Reevaluation, Retrospective study, Stepwise excavation
1.
Andersen RM: Behavioural Model of Families' Use of Health Services. Res Ser No 25. Chicago, Centre for Health Administration Studies, University of Chicago, 1968.
2.
Andersen RM: Revisiting the behavioural model and access to medical care: does it matter? J Health Soc Behav 1995;36:1-10.
3.
Bjørndal L: Indirect pulp therapy and stepwise excavation. J Endod 2008;34:S29-S33.
4.
Bjørndal L, Larsen T, Thylstrup A: A clinical and microbiological study of deep carious lesions during stepwise excavation using long treatment intervals. Caries Res 1997;31:411-417.
5.
Bjørndal L, Reit C, Bruun G, Markvart M, Kjaeldgaard M, Nasman P, Thordrup M, Dige I, Nyvad B, Fransson H, Lager A, Ericson D, Petersson K, Olsson J, Santimano EM, Wennstrom A, Winkel P, Gluud C: Treatment of deep caries lesions in adults: randomized clinical trials comparing stepwise versus direct complete excavation, and direct pulp capping vs partial pulpotomy. Eur J Oral Sci 2010;118:290-297.
6.
Bjørndal L, Thylstrup A: A practice-based study of stepwise excavation of deep carious lesions in permanent teeth: a 1-year follow-up study. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1998;26:122-128.
7.
Guzmán-Armstrong S, Warren JJ: Management of high caries risk and high caries activity patients: rampant caries control program (RCCP). J Dental Educ 2007;71:767-775.
8.
Hayashi M, Morioki F, Chinami Y, Yasuko M: Ways of enhancing pulp preservation by stepwise excavation - a systematic review. J Dent 2011;39.2:95-107.
9.
Kidd EA: How ‘clean' must a cavity be before restoration? Caries Res 2004;38:305-313.
10.
Kowalski C, Loss J, Kölsch F, Janssen C: Utilization of prevention services by gender, age, socioeconomic status, and migration status in Germany: an overview and a systematic review; in Janssen C, Swart E, von Langerke T (eds): Health Care Utilization in Germany. New York, Springer, 2014, vol 16, pp 293-320.
11.
Leksell E, Ridell K, Cvek M, Mejàre I: Pulp exposure after stepwise versus direct complete excavation of deep carious lesions in young posterior permanent teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol 1996;12:192-196.
12.
Maltz M, Garcia R, Jardim JJ, de Paula LM, Yamaguti PM, Moura MS, Garcia F, Nascimento C, Oliveira A, Mestrinho HD: Randomized trial of partial versus stepwise caries removal: 3-year follow-up. J Dent Res 2012;91:1026-1031.
13.
Marston MV: Compliance with medical regimens: a review of the literature. Nurs Res 1970;19:312-323.
14.
Massler M: Treatment of profound caries to prevent pulpal damage. J Pedod 1977;2:99-105.
15.
Ngo HC, Mount G, McIntyre J, Tuisuva J, von Doussa RJ: Chemical exchange between glass-ionomer restorations and residual carious dentine in permanent molars: an in vivo study. J Dent 2006;34:608-613.
16.
Poulsen S, Beiruti N, Sadat N: A comparison of retention and the effect on caries of fissure sealing with a glass-ionomer and a resin-based sealant. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2001;29:298-301.
17.
Ricketts D, Lamont T, Innes NP, Kidd E, Clarkson JE: Operative caries management in adults and children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;3:CD003808.
18.
Schwendicke F, Dörfer CE, Paris S: Incomplete caries removal: a systematic review and metaanalysis; J Dent Res 2013a;92:306-314.
19.
Schwendicke F, Stolpe M, Meyer-Lueckel H, Paris S, Dörfer CE: Cost-effectiveness of one-and two-step incomplete and complete excavations. J Dent Res 2013b;92:880-887.
20.
Thompson V, Craig RG, Curro FA, Green WS, Ship JA: Treatment of deep carious lesions by complete excavation or partial removal: a critical review. J Am Dent Assoc 2008;139:705-712.
21.
Umaki TM, Umaki MR, Cobb CM: The psychology of patient compliance: a focused review of the literature. J Periodontol 2012;83:395-400.
22.
Wilson TG: Compliance and its role in periodontal therapy. Periodontol 2000 1996;12:16-23.
23.
Zanata RL, Navarro MF, Barbosa SH, Lauris JR, Franco EB: Clinical evaluation of three restorative materials applied in a minimal intervention caries treatment approach. J Public Health Dent 2003;63:221-226.
© 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel
2016
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.