The aim was to measure variations in the threshold for operative treatment of occlusal caries in permanent teeth and the use of dental materials, compared with results from a similar study conducted in Norway in 1995. In 2009, a precoded questionnaire was sent electronically to 3,654 dentists with E-mail addresses in the member register of the Norwegian Dental Association. The questions were related to caries, treatment strategies and choice of dental materials. Replies were obtained from 61.3% respondents after two reminders. Restorative treatment of occlusal lesions confined to enamel was proposed by 12% of the dentists, compared with 18% in 1995 (p < 0.01). Older dentists more often than younger dentists would operatively treat enamel lesions (p < 0.01). Most dentists preferred to drill only the carious part of the fissure rather than the whole fissure both in 2009 (78.8%) and 1995 (68.3%; p < 0.01). In 2009, 91.9% preferred composite as the restorative material of choice, compared to only 39.1% in 1995. Logistic regression analyses identified higher age of the dentist as the only variable significantly associated with higher risk of restoring occlusal enamel lesions operatively. The authors conclude that especially young dentists appear to be more reluctant to remove tooth substance in 2009 compared with 1995. Composite is the dominating material of choice in 2009 and seems to have substituted the use of most other filling materials in occlusal restorations in permanent teeth.

Keywords:
Dentistry, Occlusal caries, Restorative threshold, Operative treatment
1.
American Association for Public Opinion: Standard Definitions. http://www.aapor.org/Standard_Definitions/2687.htm (accessed October 26, 2009).
2.
Bader JD, Shugars DA: Descriptive models of restorative treatment decisions. J Public Health Dent 1998;58:210-219.
3.
Bader JD, Shugars DA, Bonito AJ: A systematic review of selected caries prevention and management methods. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2001;29:399-411.
4.
Baraba A, Doméjean-Orliaguet S, Espelid I, Tveit A, Miletic I: Survey of Croatian dentists' restorative treatment decisions on approximal caries lesions. Croat Med J 2010;51:509-514.
5.
Baraba A, Doméjean-Orliaguet S, Juri H, Espelid I, Tveit A, Ani I: Restorative treatment decisions of Croatian university teachers. Coll Antropol 2012;36:1293-1299.
6.
Brantley CF, Bader JD, Shugars DA, Nesbit SP: Does the cycle of rerestoration lead to larger restorations? J Am Dent Assoc 1995;126:1407-1413.
7.
Doméjean S, Leger S, Maltrait M, Espelid I, Tveit AB, Tubert-Jeannin S: Changes in occlusal caries lesion management in France from 2002 to 2012: a persistent gap between evidence and clinical practice. Caries Res 2015;49:408-416.
8.
Doméjean-Orliaguet S, Tubert-Jeannin S, Riordan PJ, Espelid I, Tveit AB: French dentists' restorative treatment decisions. Oral Health Prev Dent 2004;2:125-131.
9.
Edwards PJ, Roberts I, Clarke MJ, DiGuiseppi C, Wentz R, Kwan I, Cooper R, Felix LM, Pratap S: Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;3:MR000008.
10.
Eklund SA: Trends in dental treatment, 1992 to 2007. J Am Dent Assoc 2010;141:391-399.
11.
El-Mowafy OM, Lewis DW: Restorative decision making by Ontario dentists. J Can Dent Assoc 1994;60:305-306.
12.
Elderton RJ: Restorations without conventional cavity preparations. Int Dent J 1988;38:112-118.
13.
Espelid I, Tveit AB, Mejare I, Sundberg H, Hallonsten AL: Restorative treatment decisions on occlusal caries in Scandinavia. Acta Odontol Scand 2001;59:21-27.
14.
Fejerskov O, Nyvad B, Kidd E (eds): Dental Caries: The Disease and Its Clinical Management, ed 3. Oxford, Wiley Blackwell, 2015.
15.
Ghasemi H, Murtomaa H, Torabzadeh H, Vehkalahti MM: Restorative treatment threshold reported by Iranian dentists. Community Dent Health 2008;25:185-190.
16.
Gordan VV, Bader JD, Garvan CW, Richman JS, Qvist V, Fellows JL, Rindal DB, Gilbert GH: Restorative treatment thresholds for occlusal primary caries among dentists in the dental practice-based research network. J Am Dent Assoc 2010;141:171-184.
17.
Gordan VV, Garvan CW, Heft MW, Fellows JL, Qvist V, Rindal DB, Gilbert GH: Restorative treatment thresholds for interproximal primary caries based on radiographic images: findings from the Dental Practice-Based Research Network. Gen Dent 2009;57:654-663.
18.
Heaven TJ, Gordan VV, Litaker MS, Fellows JL, Brad Rindal D, Firestone AR, Gilbert GH; National Dental PBRN Collaborative Group: Agreement among dentists' restorative treatment planning thresholds for primary occlusal caries, primary proximal caries, and existing restorations: findings from the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network. J Dent 2013;41:718-725.
19.
Ismail AI, Tellez M, Pitts NB, Ekstrand KR, Ricketts D, Longbottom C, Eggertsson H, Deery C, Fisher J, Young DA, Featherstone JD, Evans W, Zeller GG, Zero D, Martignon S, Fontana M, Zandona A: Caries management pathways preserve dental tissues and promote oral health. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2013;41:e12-e40.
20.
Kakudate N, Sumida F, Matsumoto Y, Manabe K, Yokoyama Y, Gilbert GH, Gordan VV: Restorative treatment thresholds for proximal caries in dental PBRN. J Dent Res 2012;91:1202-1208.
21.
Kakudate N, Sumida F, Matsumoto Y, Yokoyama Y, Gilbert GH, Gordan VV: Patient age and dentists' decisions about occlusal caries treatment thresholds. Oper Dent 2014;39:473-480.
22.
Kirkevang LL, Vaeth M, Wenzel A: Prevalence and incidence of caries lesions in relation to placement and replacement of fillings: a longitudinal observational radiographic study of an adult Danish population. Caries Res 2009;43:286-293.
23.
Lynch CD, McConnell RJ, Wilson NH: Trends in the placement of posterior composites in dental schools. J Dent Educ 2007;71:430-434.
24.
Lynch CD, Wilson NH: Teaching of direct posterior resin composite restorations in UK dental therapy training programmes. Br Dent J 2010;208:415-421.
25.
Mejàre I, Stenlund H, Zelezny-Holmlund C: Caries incidence and lesion progression from adolescence to young adulthood: a prospective 15-year cohort study in Sweden. Caries Res 2004;38:130-141.
26.
Mejàre I, Sundberg H, Espelid I, Tveit B: Caries assessment and restorative treatment thresholds reported by Swedish dentists. Acta Odontol Scand 1999;57:149-154.
27.
Nascimento MM, Gordan VV, Qvist V, Litaker MS, Rindal DB, Williams OD, Fellows JL, Ritchie LK Jr, Mjör IA, McClelland J, Gilbert GH: Reasons for placement of restorations on previously unrestored tooth surfaces by dentists in the Dental Practice-Based Research Network. J Am Dent Assoc 2010;141:441-448.
28.
Norton WE, Funkhouser E, Makhija SK, Gordan VV, Bader JD, Rindal DB, Pihlstrom DJ, Hilton TJ, Frantsve-Hawley J, Gilbert GH: Concordance between clinical practice and published evidence: findings from the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network. J Am Dent Assoc 2014;145:22-31.
29.
Nyvad B, Kidd EA: The principles of caries control for the individual patient; in Fejerskov O, Kidd EA (eds): Dental Caries: The Disease and Its Clinical Management, ed 3. Oxford, Wiley Blackwell, 2015, chapt 17, pp 335-370.
30.
Peters MC, McLean ME: Minimally invasive operative care. I. Minimal intervention and concepts for minimally invasive cavity preparations. J Adhes Dent 2001;3:7-16.
31.
Pitts NB, Wefel JS: Remineralization/desensitization: what is known? What is the future? Adv Dent Res 2009;21:83-86.
32.
Ricketts DN, Pitts NB: Traditional operative treatment options. Monogr Oral Sci 2009;21:164-173.
34.
Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K, van Dijken JW, Funegard U, Lindberg A, Nilsson M: Selection of dental materials and longevity of replaced restorations in Public Dental Health clinics in northern Sweden. J Dent 2009;37:673-678.
35.
Tubert-Jeannin S, Domejean-Orliaguet S, Riordan PJ, Espelid I, Tveit AB: Restorative treatment strategies reported by French university teachers. J Dent Educ 2004;68:1096-1103.
36.
Tveit AB, Espelid I, Skodje F: Restorative treatment decisions on approximal caries in Norway. Int Dent J 1999;49:165-172.
37.
Vidnes-Kopperud S, Tveit AB, Espelid I: Changes in the treatment concept for approximal caries from 1983 to 2009 in Norway. Caries Res 2011;45:113-120.
38.
Vidnes-Kopperud S, Tveit AB, Gaarden T, Sandvik L, Espelid I: Factors influencing dentists' choice of amalgam and tooth-colored restorative materials for class II preparations in younger patients. Acta Odontol Scand 2009;67:74-79.
© 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel
2016
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.