A pragmatic randomised controlled trial comparing a minimally invasive approach based on atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) procedures (test) was tested against the standard-care approach (control) to treat early childhood caries (ECC) in a primary-care setting in Perth, W.A., Australia. Parent/child dyads with ECC were allocated to the test or control group using stratified block randomisation. Children were examined at baseline and follow-up by two calibrated examiners blinded to group allocation status. Dental therapists trained in ART provided treatment to the test group and dentists treated the control group. Restoration quality was evaluated at follow-up using the ART criteria. Data were analysed on an intention-to-treat basis; test of proportions, Wilcoxon rank test and logistic regression, controlling for clustering of teeth, were used. Two hundred and fifty-four children were randomised (test = 127 and control = 127). There was no statistically significant difference in age, sex and baseline caries experience between the test and control groups. At follow-up (mean interval 11.4 months, SD 3.1), 220 children were examined (test = 115 and control = 105) and 597 teeth (test = 417 and control = 180) were evaluated for restoration quality, of which 16.8% (test) and 6.7% (control) were judged to have failed (required replacement; p < 0.01). Intention-to-treat, multiple logistic regression found multisurface restorations (OR = 10.4) had significantly higher odds of failure, while referral for specialist paediatric care had significantly lower odds of restoration failure (OR = 0.2). The ART-based approach enabled more children and teeth to be treated, and multisurface restoration and treatment in a primary-care setting had higher odds of restoration failure.

Keywords:
Minimally invasive treatment, Early childhood caries , Atraumatic restorative treatment, Fissure sealants, Multisurface restoration
1.
Arrow P, Klobas E: Child oral health-related quality of life and early childhood caries: a non-inferiority randomised control trial. Aust Dent J 2015a DOI: 10.1111/adj.12352.
2.
Arrow P, Klobas E: Minimum intervention dentistry approach to managing early childhood caries: a randomized control trial. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2015b;43:511-520.
3.
Boon CPJM, Visser NL, Kemoli AM, Van Amerongen WE: ART class II restoration loss in primary molars: re-restoration or not? Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2010;11:228-231.
4.
Carvalho TS, Sampaio FC, Diniz A, Bönecker M, Van Amerongen WE: Two years survival rate of class II ART restorations in primary molars using two ways to avoid saliva contamination. Int J Paediatr Dent 2010;20:419-425.
5.
Deepa G, Shobha T: A clinical evaluation of two glass ionomer cements in primary molars using atraumatic restorative treatment technique in India: 1 year follow up. Int J Paediatr Dent 2010;20:410-418.
6.
Drury TF, Horowitz AM, Ismail AI, et al: Diagnosing and reporting early childhood caries for research purposes. A report of a workshop sponsored by the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, the Health Resources and Services Administration, and the Health Care Financing Administration. J Public Health Dent 1999;59:192-197.
7.
Ersin NK, Candan U, Aykut A, et al: A clinical evaluation of resin-based composite and glass ionomer cement restorations placed in primary teeth using the ART approach: results at 24 months. J Am Dent Assoc 2006;137:1529-1536.
8.
Frencken J, Leal S: The correct use of the ART approach. J Appl Oral Sci 2010;18:1-4.
9.
Frencken JE, Leal SC, Navarro MF: Twenty-five-year atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach: a comprehensive overview. Clin Oral Investig 2012;16:1337-1346.
10.
Frencken JE, Makoni F, Sithole WD: Atraumatic restorative treatment and glass-ionomer sealants in a school oral health programme in Zimbabwe: evaluation after 1 year. Caries Res 1996a;30:428-433.
11.
Frencken JE, Makoni F, Sithole WD, Hackenitz E: Three-year survival of one-surface ART restorations and glass-ionomer sealants in a school oral health programme in Zimbabwe. Caries Res 1998;32:119-126.
12.
Frencken JE, Pilot T, Songpaisan Y, Phantumvanit P: Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART): rationale, technique, and development. J Public Health Dent 1996b;56:135-140.
13.
Frencken J, Van Amerongen E, Phantumvanit P, Songpaisan Y, Pilot T: Manual for the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment Approach to Control Dental Caries. Groningen, WHO Collaborating Centre for Oral Health Services Research, 1997.
14.
Holmgren CJ, Roux D, Domejean S: Minimal intervention dentistry. Part 5. Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) - a minimum intervention and minimally invasive approach for the management of dental caries. Br Dent J 2013;214:11-18.
15.
Lo EC, Holmgren CJ: Provision of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) restorations to Chinese pre-school children - a 30-month evaluation. Int J Paediatr Dent 2001;11:3-10.
16.
Lo E, Holmgren C, Hu D, van Palenstein Helderman W: Six-year follow up of atraumatic restorative treatment restorations placed in Chinese school children. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2007;35:387-392.
17.
Lo EC, Luo Y, Tan HP, Dyson JE, Corbet EF: ART and conventional root restorations in elders after 12 months. J Dent Res 2006;85:929-932.
18.
Lopez N, Simpser-Rafalin S, Berthold P: Atraumatic restorative treatment for prevention and treatment of caries in an underserved community. Am J Public Health 2005;95:1338-1339.
19.
Massara Mde L, Bönecker M: Modified ART: Why not? Braz Oral Res 2012;26:187-189.
20.
Mickenautsch S, Yengopal V, Banerjee A: Atraumatic restorative treatment versus amalgam restoration longevity: a systematic review. Clin Oral Investig 2010;14:233-240.
21.
Pahel BT, Rozier RG, Slade GD: Parental perceptions of children's oral health: the Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale (ECOHIS). Health Qual Life Outcomes 2007;5:6.
22.
Patsopoulos NA: A pragmatic view on pragmatic trials. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 2011;13:217-224.
23.
Pocock S: Clinical Trials: A Practical Approach. Chichester, Wiley, 1983.
24.
Rabe-Hesketh S, Skrondal A: Multilevel and Longitudinal Modelling using STATA. Volume II: Categorical Responses, Counts, and Survival. College Station, StataCorp, 2012.
25.
Schwartz D, Lellouch J: Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutic trials. J Chron Dis 1967;20:637-648.
26.
StataCorp. Stata: Release 12. College Station, StataCorp, 2011.
27.
van't Hof MA, Frencken JE, van Palenstein Helderman WH, Holmgren CJ: The atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach for managing dental caries: a meta-analysis. Int Dent J 2006;56:345-351.
28.
Walsh LJ, Brostek AM: Minimum intervention dentistry principles and objectives. Aust Dent J 2013;58(suppl 1):3-16.
© 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel
2015
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.