Despite promising results using probiotics, evidence of the preventive effect on enamel demineralization is insufficient and the cariogenic potential of probiotics is still controversial. Probiotics could affect biofilm formation and interfere with adherence, growth or coaggregation with Streptococcus mutans in biofilms. However, most of the studies have been conducted using planktonic bacteria. Hence, the aim of the study was to assess the effect of probiotic bacteria on the cariogenicity of S. mutans using an in vitro biofilm caries model on enamel. Single-species biofilms (S. mutans UA159, SM or Lactobacillus rhamnosus LB21, LB) or dual-species biofilms simultaneously inoculated (SM + LB) or LB inoculated 8 h after SM (SM → LB) were grown for 96 h. Biofilms were formed on bovine enamel saliva-coated slabs of known surface hardness (SH) and immersed in culture media. Biofilms were exposed 8 times per day to 10% sucrose. Medium pH was monitored twice daily as a biofilm acidogenicity indicator. After 96 h, biofilms were collected to determine biomass and bacteria viability. Slab demineralization was calculated as percentage of SH loss (%SHL). Additionally, the model was tested with different concentrations of the initial inoculum (103, 106, 108 cells/ml) and different adhesion times (2 or 8 h). The dual-species biofilm revealed no LB effects on SM cariogenicity, without changes in acidogenicity or %SHL among groups (p > 0.05, n = 12). Lack of activity of LB on SM cariogenicity persisted even when 105 times higher concentration of the probiotic was tested. Coaggregation was not observed. In conclusion, findings suggest that LB does not reduce cariogenicity of SM in a validated experimental caries model.

1.
Ahola AJ, Yli-Knuuttila H, Suomalainen T, Poussa T, Ahlstrom A, Meurman JH, Korpela R: Short-term consumption of probiotic-containing cheese and its effect on dental caries risk factors. Arch Oral Biol 2002;47:799-804.
2.
Aires CP, Del Bel Cury AA, Tenuta LM, Klein MI, Koo H, Duarte S, Cury JA: Effect of starch and sucrose on dental biofilm formation and on root dentine demineralization. Caries Res 2008;42:380-386.
3.
Azevedo MS, van de Sande FH, Romano AR, Cenci MS: Microcosm biofilms originating from children with different caries experience have similar cariogenicity under successive sucrose challenges. Caries Res 2011;45:510-517.
4.
Badet C, Thebaud NB: Ecology of lactobacilli in the oral cavity: a review of literature. Open Microbiol J 2008;2:38-48.
5.
Beighton D: The complex oral microflora of high-risk individuals and groups and its role in the caries process. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2005;33:248-255.
6.
Cagetti MG, Mastroberardino S, Milia E, Cocco F, Lingstrom P, Campus G: The use of probiotic strains in caries prevention: a systematic review. Nutrients 2013;5:2530-2550.
7.
Caglar E, Cildir SK, Ergeneli S, Sandalli N, Twetman S: Salivary mutans streptococci and lactobacilli levels after ingestion of the probiotic bacterium Lactobacillus reuteri ATCC 55730 by straws or tablets. Acta Odontol Scand 2006;64:314-318.
8.
Campus G, Cocco F, Carta G, Cagetti MG, Simark-Mattson C, Strohmenger L, Lingstrom P: Effect of a daily dose of Lactobacillus brevis CD2 lozenges in high caries risk schoolchildren. Clin Oral Investig 2014;18:555-561.
9.
Ccahuana-Vásquez RA, Cury JA: S. Mutans biofilm model to evaluate antimicrobial substances and enamel demineralization. Braz Oral Res 2010;24:135-141.
10.
Collado MC, Meriluoto J, Salminen S: Measurement of aggregation properties between probiotics and pathogens: in vitro evaluation of different methods. J Microbiol Methods 2007;71:71-74.
11.
Cury JA, Rebelo MA, Del Bel Cury AA, Derbyshire MT, Tabchoury CP: Biochemical composition and cariogenicity of dental plaque formed in the presence of sucrose or glucose and fructose. Caries Res 2000;34:491-497.
12.
Giacaman RA, Jobet-Vila P, Munoz-Sandoval C: Fatty acid effect on sucrose-induced enamel demineralization and cariogenicity of an experimental biofilm-caries model. Odontology 2014;103:169-176.
13.
Giacaman RA, Munoz MJ, Ccahuana-Vasquez RA, Munoz-Sandoval C, Cury JA: Effect of fluoridated milk on enamel and root dentin demineralization evaluated by a biofilm caries model. Caries Res 2012;46:460-466.
14.
Giacaman RA, Munoz-Sandoval C: Cariogenicity of different commercially available bovine milk types in a biofilm caries model. Pediatr Dent 2014;36:1-6.
15.
Handley PS, Harty DW, Wyatt JE, Brown CR, Doran JP, Gibbs AC: A comparison of the adhesion, coaggregation and cell-surface hydrophobicity properties of fibrillar and fimbriate strains of Streptococcus salivarius. J Gen Microbiol 1987;133:3207-3217.
16.
Hasslof P, Hedberg M, Twetman S, Stecksen-Blicks C: Growth inhibition of oral mutans streptococci and candida by commercial probiotic lactobacilli - an in vitro study. BMC Oral Health 2010;10:18.
17.
Haukioja A, Loimaranta V, Tenovuo J: Probiotic bacteria affect the composition of salivary pellicle and streptococcal adhesion in vitro. Oral Microbiol Immunol 2008a;23:336-343.
18.
Haukioja A, Soderling E, Tenovuo J: Acid production from sugars and sugar alcohols by probiotic lactobacilli and bifidobacteria in vitro. Caries Res 2008b;42:449-453.
19.
Hedberg M, Hasslof P, Sjostrom I, Twetman S, Stecksen-Blicks C: Sugar fermentation in probiotic bacteria - an in vitro study. Oral Microbiol Immunol 2008;23:482-485.
20.
Holz C, Alexander C, Balcke C, More M, Auinger A, Bauer M, Junker L, Grunwald J, Lang C, Pompejus M: DSMZ16671 reduces mutans streptococci: a short-term pilot study. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 2013;5:259-263.
21.
Juneja A, Kakade A: Evaluating the effect of probiotic containing milk on salivary mutans streptococci levels. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2012;37:9-14.
22.
Kneist S, Schmidt F, Callaway A, Willershausen B, Rupf S, Wicht M, Thiede B: Diversity of Lactobacillus species in deep carious lesions of primary molars. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2010;11:181-186.
23.
Koo H, Hayacibara MF, Schobel BD, Cury JA, Rosalen PL, Park YK, Vacca-Smith AM, Bowen WH: Inhibition of streptococcus mutans biofilm accumulation and polysaccharide production by apigenin and tt-farnesol. J Antimicrob Chemother 2003;52:782-789.
24.
Laleman I, Detailleur V, Slot DE, Slomka V, Quirynen M, Teughels W: Probiotics reduce mutans streptococci counts in humans: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig 2014;18:1539-1552.
25.
Lang C, Bottner M, Holz C, Veen M, Ryser M, Reindl A, Pompejus M, Tanzer JM: Specific Lactobacillus/mutans streptococcus co-aggregation. J Dent Res 2010;89:175-179.
26.
Lee SH, Kim YJ: A comparative study of the effect of probiotics on cariogenic biofilm model for preventing dental caries. Arch Microbiol 2014;196:601-609.
27.
Marsh PD: Dental plaque as a biofilm and a microbial community - implications for health and disease. BMC Oral Health 2006;6(suppl 1):S14.
28.
Meurman JH, Antila H, Korhonen A, Salminen S: Effect of Lactobacillus rhamnosus strain GG (ATCC 53103) on the growth of Streptococcus sobrinus in vitro. Eur J Oral Sci 1995;103:253-258.
29.
Muñoz-Sandoval C, Muñoz-Cifuentes MJ, Giacaman RA, Ccahuana-Vasquez RA, Cury JA: Effect of bovine milk on Streptococcus mutans biofilm cariogenic properties and enamel and dentin demineralization. Pediatr Dent 2012;34:197-201.
30.
Nase L, Hatakka K, Savilahti E, Saxelin M, Ponka A, Poussa T, Korpela R, Meurman JH: Effect of long-term consumption of a probiotic bacterium, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG, in milk on dental caries and caries risk in children. Caries Res 2001;35:412-420.
31.
Nikawa H, Makihira S, Fukushima H, Nishimura H, Ozaki Y, Ishida K, Darmawan S, Hamada T, Hara K, Matsumoto A, Takemoto T, Aimi R: Lactobacillus reuteri in bovine milk fermented decreases the oral carriage of mutans streptococci. Int J Food Microbiol 2004;95:219-223.
32.
Petersson LG, Magnusson K, Hakestam U, Baigi A, Twetman S: Reversal of primary root caries lesions after daily intake of milk supplemented with fluoride and probiotic lactobacilli in older adults. Acta Odontol Scand 2011;69:321-327.
33.
Ribeiro CC, Ccahuana-Vasquez RA, Carmo CD, Alves CM, Leitao TJ, Vidotti LR, Cury JA: The effect of iron on Streptococcus mutans biofilm and on enamel demineralization. Braz Oral Res 2012;26:300-305.
34.
Schwendicke F, Dorfer C, Kneist S, Meyer-Lueckel H, Paris S: Cariogenic effects of probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG in a dental biofilm model. Caries Res 2014;48:186-192.
35.
Soderling EM, Marttinen AM, Haukioja AL: Probiotic lactobacilli interfere with Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation in vitro. Curr Microbiol 2011;62:618-622.
36.
Stecksen-Blicks C, Sjostrom I, Twetman S: Effect of long-term consumption of milk supplemented with probiotic lactobacilli and fluoride on dental caries and general health in preschool children: a cluster-randomized study. Caries Res 2009;43:374-381.
37.
Stensson M, Koch G, Coric S, Abrahamsson TR, Jenmalm MC, Birkhed D, Wendt LK: Oral administration of Lactobacillus reuteri during the first year of life reduces caries prevalence in the primary dentition at 9 years of age. Caries Res 2014;48:111-117.
38.
Tanzer JM, Thompson A, Lang C, Cooper B, Hareng L, Gamer A, Reindl A, Pompejus M: Caries inhibition by and safety of Lactobacillus paracasei DSMZ16671. J Dent Res 2010;89:921-926.
39.
Teanpaisan R, Piwat S: Lactobacillus paracasei SD1, a novel probiotic, reduces mutans streptococci in human volunteers: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Clin Oral Investig 2014;18:857-862.
40.
Twetman S, Keller MK: Probiotics for caries prevention and control. Adv Dent Res 2012;24:98-102.
41.
Twetman L, Larsen U, Fiehn NE, Stecksen-Blicks C, Twetman S: Coaggregation between probiotic bacteria and caries-associated strains: an in vitro study. Acta Odontol Scand 2009;67:284-288.
42.
Twetman S, Stecksen-Blicks C: Probiotics and oral health effects in children. Int J Paediatr Dent 2008;18:3-10.
43.
Wu CC, Lin CT, Wu CY, Peng WS, Lee MJ, Tsai YC: Inhibitory effect of Lactobacillus salivarius on streptococcus mutans biofilm formation. Mol Oral Microbiol 2015;30:16-26.
44.
Zero DT: In situ caries models. Adv Dent Res 1995;9:214-230.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.