The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of tooth type (molar/premolar), tooth surface (buccal/lingual), smear layer or no smear layer, storage of specimens in deionised water, mode and speed of agitation, and rinsing method between cycles on mean step height loss and Knoop microhardness (KHN) change. Polished human enamel specimens embedded in acrylic resin were prepared from sound permanent molar and premolar tooth surfaces. A 0.3% (pH 3.2) solution of citric acid was used to erode the specimens, in a cycling procedure, consisting of 10 min immersion followed by rinsing in deionised water for 30 s with a spray bottle, for 5 cycles. The specimens were analysed with a non-contact white light profilometer and KHN. Molar teeth (148.99 ± 24.49 KHN) and buccal surfaces (155.62 ± 30.35 KHN) produced significantly less microhardness change compared to premolar (186.40 ± 20.74 KHN) and lingual surfaces (179.76 ± 23.21 KHN; p < 0001). The effect of storage and rinsing showed little difference in mean step height loss (<1 µm) and microhardness change. With no smear layer a significantly lower mean step height loss and microhardness change (p < 0.001) was observed. Agitation was performed with Orbital, Gyro and See-Saw rockers at 30, 40, 60, and 70 rpm. The mean step height loss was largest for See-Saw at 70 rpm (11.73 ± 0.91 μm) and lowest for Orbital at 30 rpm (2.76 ± 1.12 μm). A statistical difference was found between all types of agitation and speeds (p < 0.001). In conclusion, this study has shown that the variables investigated here have a significant impact on the measurable outcome, highlighting the importance of accurate and detailed method sections.

Keywords:
Erosion, Enamel, In vitro investigation, Microhardness, Profilometry
1.
Attin T, Becker K, Roos M, Attin R, Paque F: Impact of storage conditions on profilometry of eroded dental hard tissue. Clin Oral Investig 2009;13:473-478.
2.
Attin T, Becker K, Wiegand A, Tauböck TT, Wegehaupt FJ,: Impact of laminar flow velocity of different acids on enamel calcium loss. Clin Oral Investig 2012;17:595-600.
3.
Attin T, Zirkel C, Hellwig E: Brushing abrasion of eroded dentin after application of sodium fluoride solutions. Caries Res 1998;32:344-350.
4.
Austin RS, Stenhagen KS, Hove LH, Dunne S, Moazzez R, Bartlett DW, et al: A qualitative and quantitative investigation into the effect of fluoride formulations on enamel erosion and erosion-abrasion in vitro. J Dent 2011;39:648-655.
5.
Barbour ME, Parker DM, Allen GC, Jandt KD: Human enamel dissolution in citric acid as a function of pH in the range 2.30 ≤ pH ≤ 6.30 - a nanoindentation study. Eur J Oral Sci 2003;111:258-262.
6.
Eisenburger M, Addy M: Influence of liquid temperature and flow rate on enamel erosion and surface softening. J Oral Rehabil 2003;30:1076-1080.
7.
Ganss C, Klimek J, Schwarz N: A comparative profilometric in vitro study of the susceptibility of polished and natural human enamel and dentine surfaces to erosive demineralization. Arch Oral Biol 2000;45:897-902.
8.
Sabel N, Robertson A, Nietzsche S, Noren JG: Demineralization of enamel in primary second molars related to properties of the enamel. ScientificWorldJournal 2012;2012:587254.
9.
Sanches RP, Otani C, Damião AJ, Miyakawa W: AFM characterization of bovine enamel and dentine after acid-etching. Micron 2009;40:502-506.
10.
Selvin S: Statistical Analysis of Epidemiological Data. New York, Oxford University Press, 2004, p 208.
11.
Shellis RP, Finke M, Eisenburger M, Parker DM, Addy M: Relationship between enamel erosion and liquid flow rate. Eur J Oral Sci 2005;113:232-238.
12.
Watari F: In situ quantitative analysis of etching process of human teeth by atomic force microscopy. J Electron Microsc (Tokyo) 2005;54:299-308.
13.
White DJ: The application of in vitro models to research on demineralization and remineralization of the teeth. Adv Dent Res 1995;9:175-177.
14.
Wiegand A, Kowing L, Attin T: Impact of brushing force on abrasion of acid-softened and sound enamel. Arch Oral Biol 2007;52:1043-1047.
15.
Wiegand A, Wolmershäuser S, Hellwig E, Attin T: Influence of buffering effects of dentifrices and fluoride gels on abrasion on eroded dentine. Arch Oral Biol 2004;49:259-265.
© 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel
2015
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.