The study aimed at identifying oral health determinants that are present in early childhood, are amenable to change and for which there is evidence of their modulation of the rate of caries progression in a sample of non-privileged children. The null hypothesis was that determinants associated with the child's institutional environment as evidenced by nursery policies significantly influenced the child's oral health. The sample was formed by 2,511 Brazilian 1-5-year-olds. Caries severity and activity were recorded. Parents were interviewed and nurseries answered a questionnaire. According to the case status d1efs, the final multilevel model (generalized linear mixed model) identified significant associations with determinants such as bottle-feeding the child during the night on demand, not assisting the child in toothbrushing, ensuring visit to the dentist in case of troubles with teeth only (p < 0.0001) and intake of sugary products 2-4 times daily at nursery (p = 0.026). The likelihood of caries outcomes was associated with determinants related to nursery policies, not promoting preventive oral health care for children of mothers with 4 years of education (OR = 2.14; p < 0.0015) and <4 years of education (OR = 2.6; p = 0.0010), as well as consumption of sugary products 2-4 times daily for children of mothers with 4 years of education (OR = 3.35; p = 0.0010) and <4 years of education (OR = 4.07; p = 0.0063). In conclusion, determinants related to parental negative practices and to nursery policies significantly influenced children's oral health. Of particular interest was the identification of determinants considered amenable to change in connection with nursery policies towards oral health.

1.
Agency for Social Development of the Federal District of Brazil - Brazilian Ministry of Education. Report, 2006.
2.
Alm A, Wendt LK, Koch G, Birkhed D: Prevalence of approximal caries in posterior teeth in 15-year-old Swedish teenagers in relation to their caries experience at 3 years of age. Caries Res 2007;41:392-398.
3.
Burt BA: Concepts of risk in dental public health. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2005;33:240-247.
4.
CAESB - Water and Sanitation Service of the Federal District of Brazil - DRSA - Brasília. Report, 2011.
5.
Carvalho JC, D'Hoore W, Van Nieuwenhuysen JP: Caries decline in the primary dentition of Belgian children over 15 years. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2004;32:277-282.
6.
Carvalho JC, Figueiredo MJ, Vieira EO, Mestrinho HD: Caries trends in Brazilian non-privileged preschool children in 1996 and 2006. Caries Res 2009;43:2-9.
7.
Carvalho JC, Mestrinho HD, Barreto AC, Maltz M: Onset, development and arrest of dental caries in Brazilian pre-school children. Clin Oral Invest 1998;2:96-100.
8.
Ferreira SH, Béria JU, Kramer PF, Feldens EG, Feldens CA: Dental caries in 0- to 5-year-old Brazilian children: prevalence, severity, and associated factors. Int J Paediatr Dent 2007;17:289-296.
9.
Fontana M, Jackson R, Eckert G, Zandona AF, Ando M, Stookey GK, Downs S, Zero DT: Identification of caries risk factors in toddlers. J Dent Res 2011a;90:204-214.
10.
Fontana M, Santiago E, Eckert GJ, Ferreira-Zandona AG: Risk factors of caries progression in a Hispanic school-aged population. J Dent Res 2011b;90:1189-1196.
11.
Ismail AI, Lim S, Sohn W, Willem JM: Determinants of early childhood caries in low-income African American young children. Pediatr Dent 2008;30:289-296.
12.
Ismail AI, Lim S, Sohn W, Willem JM: Predictors of dental caries progression in primary teeth. J Dent Res 2009;88:270-275.
13.
Mattila ML, Rautava P, Aromaa M, Ojanlatva A, Paunio P, Hyssälä L, Helenius H, Sillanpää M: Behavioural and demographic factors during early childhood and poor dental health at 10 years of age. Caries Res 2005;39:85-91.
14.
Mohebbi SZ, Virtanen JI, Vahid-Golpayegani M, Vehkalahti MM: Feeding habits as determinants of early childhood caries in a population where prolonged breastfeeding is the norm. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2008;36:363-369.
15.
Newton JT, Bower EJ: The social determinants of oral health: new approaches to conceptualizing and researching complex causal networks. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2005;33: 25-34.
16.
Öhlund I, Holgerson PL, Bäckman B, Lind T, Hernell O, Johansson I: Diet intake and caries prevalence in four-year-old children living in a low-prevalence country. Caries Res 2007;41:26-33.
17.
Peres MA, Peres KG, de Barros AJ, Victora CG: The relation between family socioeconomic trajectories from childhood to adolescence and dental caries and associated oral behaviours. J Epidemiol Community Health 2007;61:141-145.
18.
Reisine S, Tellez M, Willem J, Sohn W, Ismail A: Relationship between caregiver's and child's caries prevalence among disadvantaged African Americans. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2008;36:191-200.
19.
Rodrigues CS, Sheiham A: The relationships between dietary guidelines, sugar intake and caries in primary teeth in low income Brazilian 3-year-olds: a longitudinal study. Int J Paediatr Dent 2000;10:47-55.
20.
Skeie MS, Klock KS, Haugejorden O, Riordan PJ, Espelid I: Tracking of parents' attitudes to their children's oral health-related behavior - Oslo, Norway, 2002-04. Acta Odontol Scand 2010;68:49-56.
21.
Twetman S, Axelsson S, Dahlgren H, Holm AK, Källestål C, Lagerlöf F, Lingström P, Mejàre I, Nordenram G, Norlund A, Petersson LG, Söder B: Caries-preventive effect of fluoride toothpaste: a systematic review. Acta Odontol Scand 2003;61:347-355.
22.
Watt RG: From victim blaming to upstream action: tackling the social determinants of oral health inequalities. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2007;35:1-11.
23.
World Health Organisation (WHO): The determinants of health. http://www.who.int/hia/evidence/doh/en/, 2012.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.