Questionable occlusal carious lesions (QOC) can be defined as an occlusal tooth surface with no cavitation and no radiographic radiolucencies, but caries is suspected due to roughness, surface opacities or staining. An earlier analysis of data from this study indicates 1/3 of patients have a QOC. The objective of this report has been to quantify the characteristics of these common lesions, the diagnostic aids used and the treatment of QOC. A total of 82 dentist and hygienist practitioner-investigators from the USA and Denmark in the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network participated. When consenting patients presented with a QOC, information was recorded about the patient, tooth, lesion and treatments. A total of 2,603 QOC from 1,732 patients were analyzed. The lesions were usually associated with a fissure, on molars, and varied from yellow to black in color. Half presented with a chalky luster and had a rough surface when examined with an explorer. There was an association between color and luster: 10% were chalky-light, 47% were shiny-dark and 42% were mixtures. A higher proportion of chalky than of shiny lesions were light (22 vs. 9%; p < 0.001). Lesions light in color were less common in adults than in pediatric patients (9 vs. 32%; p < 0.001). Lesions that were chalky and light were more common among pediatric than among adult patients (22 vs. 6%; p < 0.001). This is the first study to investigate characteristics of QOC in routine clinical practice. Clinicians commonly face this diagnostic uncertainty. Determining the characteristics of these lesions is relevant when making diagnostic and treatment decisions.

Keywords:
Clinical research, Dental caries, Multicenter studies, Practice-based research, Questionable lesions
1.
Bader JD, Shugars DA: The evidence supporting alternative management strategies for early occlusal caries and suspected occlusal dentinal caries. J Evid Based Dent Pract 2006;6:91-100.
2.
Balevi B: The management of suspicious or incipient occlusal caries: a decision tree analysis. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2008;36:392-400.
3.
Basting RT, Serra MC: Occlusal caries: diagnosis and noninvasive treatments. Quintessence Int 1999;30:174-178.
4.
Brown LJ, Wall TP, Lazar V: Trends in total caries experience: permanent and primary teeth. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131:223-231.
5.
Browning WD, Dennison JB: A survey of failure modes in composite resin restorations. Oper Dent 1996;21:160-166.
6.
Dye BA, Thornton-Evans G: Trends in oral health by poverty status as measure by Healthy People 2012 objectives. Public Health Rep 2010;125:817-830.
7.
Ekstrand KR, Martignon S, Ricketts DJ, Qvist V: Detection and activity assessment of primary coronal caries lesions: a methodologic study. Oper dent 2007;32:225-235.
8.
Ekstrand KR, Ricketts DN, Kidd EA: Reproducibility and accuracy of three methods for assessment of demineralization depth of the occlusal surface: an in vitro examination. Caries Res 1997;31:224-231.
9.
Frencken JE, Peters MC, Manton DJ, Leal SC, Gordan VV, Eden E: Minimal intervention dentistry for managing dental caries - a review: report of a FCI task group. Int Dent J 2012;62:223-243.
10.
Gilbert GH, William OD, Rindal DB, Pihlstrom DJ, Benjamin PL, Wallace MC, DPBRN Collaborative Group: The creation and development of the Dental Practice-Based Research Network. J Am Dent Assoc 2008;139:74-81.
11.
Groeneveld A, van Eck AA, Backer Dirks O: Fluoride in caries prevention: is the effect pre- or post-eruptive? J Dent Res 1990;69(spec No):751-755.
12.
Hamilton JC, Dennison JB, Stoffers KW, Gregory WA, Welch KB: Early treatment of incipient carious lesions: a two-year clinical evaluation. J Am Dent Assoc 2002;133:1643-1651.
13.
Hamilton JC, Dennison JB, Stoffers KW, Welch KB: A clinical evaluation of air abrasion treatment of questionable carious lesions: a 12-month report. J Am Dent Assoc 2001;132:762-769.
14.
Ismail AI, Hasson H, Sohn W: Dental caries in the second millennium. J Dent Educ 2001;65:953-959.
15.
Kaste L, Selwitz R, Oldakowski R, Brunelle JA, Winn DA, Brown LJ: Coronal caries in the primary and permanent dentition of children and adolescents 1-17 years of age: United States, 1988-1991. J Dent Res 1996;75(spec No):631-641.
16.
Ketley CE, Holt RD: Visual and radiographic diagnosis of occlusal caries in first permanent molars and in second primary molars. Br Dent J 1993;174:364-370.
17.
Kidd EAM, Nyvad B: Caries control for the individual patient; in Fejerskov O, Kidd EAM (eds): Dental Caries: The Disease and Its Clinical Management. London, Blackwell Munksgaard, 2003, pp 303-312.
18.
Kidd EAM, Ricketts DNJ, Pitts NB: Occlusal caries diagnosis: a changing challenge for clinician and epidemiologists. J Dent 1993;21:323-331.
19.
Lehmann M, Veitz-Keenan A, Matthews AG, Vena D, Grill A, Craig RG, Curro FA, Thompson VA: Dentin caries activity in early occlusal lesions selected to receive operative treatment: findings from the Practitioners Engaged in Applied Research and Learning (PEARL) Network. J Am Dent Assoc 2012;143:377-385.
20.
Lussi A: Comparison of different methods for the diagnosis of fissure caries without cavitation. Caries Res 1993;27:409-416.
21.
Makhija SK, Gilbert GH, Funkhouser EM, Bader JD, Gordan VV, Rindal DB, Bauer M, Pihlstrom DJ, Qvist V, National Dental PBRN Collaborative Group: The prevalence of questionable occlusal caries: findings from the Dental Practice-Based Research Network. J Am Dent Assoc 2012;143:1343-1350.
22.
Makhija SK, Gilbert GH, Rindal DB, Benjamin PL, Richman JS, Pihlstrom DJ, DBPRN Collaborative Group: Dentists in practice-based research networks have much in common with dentists at large: evidence from the Dental PBRN. Gen Dent 2009;57:270-275.
23.
Meiers J, Jensen M: Management of the questionable carious fissure: invasive vs. noninvasive techniques. J Am Dent Assoc 1984;108:64-68.
24.
Miller PA, Ismail AI, MacInnis WA: Restorative management of carious pits and fissures: a new approach (abstract). J Dent Res 1995;74:248.
25.
NHANES III: Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994. National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1996.
26.
Ouellet A, Hondrum SO, Pietz DM: Detection of occlusal carious lesions. Gen Dent 2002;50:346-350.
27.
Pine CM, Bosch JJ: Dynamics of and diagnostic methods for detecting small carious lesions. Caries Res 1996;30:381-388.
28.
Pitts NB: Diagnostic tools and measurements: impact on appropriate care. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1997;25:24-35.
29.
Pitts NB: Are we ready to move from operative to non-operative/preventive treatment of dental caries in clinical practice? Caries Res 2004;38:294-304.
30.
Sawle RF, Andlaw RJ: Has occlusal caries become more difficult to diagnose? Br Dent J 1988;164:209-211.
31.
Verdonschot EH, Angmar-Månsson B, ten Bosch JJ, Deery CH, Huysman MC, Pitts NB, Waller E: Developments in caries diagnosis and their relationship to treatment decisions and quality of care. ORCA Saturday Afternoon Symposium 1997. Caries Res 1999;33:32-40.
32.
Weerheijm KL, de Soet JJ, de Graaff J, van Amerongen WE: Occlusal hidden caries: a bacteriological profile. ASDC J Dent Child 1990;57:428-432.
33.
White JM, Eakle WS: Rationale and treatment approach in minimally invasive dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;131(suppl):13S-19S.
34.
Winn F, Brunelle J, Selwitz R, Kaste LM, Oldakowski RJ, Kingman A, Brown LJ: Coronal and root caries in the dentition of adults in the United States, 1988-1991. J Dent Res 1996;75(spec No):642-651.
© 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel
2014
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.