The acquired pellicle adheres to tooth surfaces and has been suggested to provide differing degrees of protection against acidic erosion. This study investigated whether pellicle formed on enamel blocks in patients suffering dietary dental erosion modified the effect of an in vitro simulated dietary challenge, in comparison with pellicle formed on enamel blocks in healthy subjects and to no-pellicle enamel samples. Sixty subjects recruited from dental erosion clinics were compared to healthy age-matched controls. Subjects wore a custom-made maxillary splint holding human enamel blocks for 1 h during which the acquired enamel pellicle was formed. Enamel blocks were removed from the splints and a simulated dietary erosive challenge of 10 min was performed. In addition the challenge was performed on 30 enamel samples without pellicle. Profilometry showed no statistical difference between samples from the erosion subjects with a mean step height of 1.74 µm (SD 0.88) and median roughness (Sa) of 0.39 µm (interquartile range, IQR 0.3-0.56) and the controls with 1.34 µm (SD 0.66) and 0.33 µm (IQR 0.27-0.38), respectively. The control samples without pellicle had Sa of 0.44 µm (IQR 0.36-0.69) and these differences were statistically significant compared to those from the healthy subjects (p = 0.002). Mean (SD) microhardness reduction with a 100-gram load for the erosion group was 113.5 (10) KHN, for healthy subjects was 93 (15.4) KHN and for the enamel samples without pellicle 139.6 (21.8) KHN and all groups were statistically different. The microhardness and roughness data suggested the pellicle influenced erosion under these study conditions.

1.
Amaechi BT, Higham SM: Eroded enamel lesion remineralization by saliva as a possible factor in the site-specificity of human dental erosion. Arch Oral Biol 2001;46:697-703.
2.
Amaechi B, Higham S, Edgar W, Milosevic A: Thickness of acquired salivary pellicle as a determinant of the sites of dental erosion. J Dent Res 1999;78:1821.
3.
Attin T: Methods for assessment of dental erosion. Monogr Oral Sci 2006;20:152-172.
4.
Bartlett DW, Coward PY, Nikkah C, Wilson RF: The prevalence of tooth wear in a cluster sample of adolescent schoolchildren and its relationship with potential explanatory factors. Br Dent J 1998;184:125-129.
5.
Bartlett D, Fares J, Shirodaria S, Chiu K, Ahmad N, Sherriff M: The association of tooth wear, diet and dietary habits in adults aged 18-30 years old. J Dent 2011;39:811-816.
6.
Bartlett D, Ganss C, Lussi A: Basic Erosive Wear Examination (BEWE): a new scoring system for scientific and clinical needs. Clin Oral Investig 2008;12(suppl 1):S65-S68.
7.
Eisenburger M, Addy M, Hughes JA, Shellis RP: Effect of time on the remineralisation of enamel by synthetic saliva after citric acid erosion. Caries Res 2001;35:211-215.
8.
Field J, Waterhouse P, German M: Quantifying and qualifying surface changes on dental hard tissues in vitro. J Dent 2010;38:182-190.
9.
Gudmundsson K, Kristleifsson G, Theodors A, Holbrook WP: Tooth erosion, gastroesophageal reflux, and salivary buffer capacity. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1995;79:185-189.
10.
Hannig M, Balz M: Influence of in-vitro formed salivary pellicle on enamel erosion. Caries Res 1999;33:372-379.
11.
Hannig M, Balz M: Protective properties of salivary pellicles from two different intraoral sites on enamel erosion. Caries Res 2001;35:142-148.
12.
Hannig C, Becker K, Hausler N, Hoth-Hannig W, Attin T, Hannig M: Protective effect of the in situ pellicle on dentin erosion - an ex vivo pilot study. Arch Oral Biol 2007;52:444-449.
13.
Hannig M, Fiebiger M, Güntzer M, Döbert A, Zimehl R, Nekrashevych Y: Protective effect of the in situ formed short-term salivary pellicle. Arch Oral Biol 2004;49:903-910.
14.
Hannig C, Hamkens A, Becker K, Attin R, Attin T: Erosive effects of different acids on bovine enamel: release of calcium and phosphate in vitro. Arch Oral Biol 2005a;50:541-552.
15.
Hannig C, Hannig M, Attin T: Enzymes in the acquired enamel pellicle. Eur J Oral Sci 2005b;113:2-13.
16.
Hara AT, Ando M, González-Cabezas C, Cury JA, Serra MC, Zero DT: Protective effect of the dental pellicle against erosive challenges in situ. J Dent Res 2006a;85:612-616.
17.
Hara AT, Lussi A, Zero DT: Biological factors. Monogr Oral Sci 2006b;20:88-99.
18.
Leach RK: Surface topography characterisation; in Fundamental Principles of Engineering Nanometrology. Oxford, William Andrew/Amsterdam, Elsevier Science, 2010a, pp 211-262.
19.
Leach RK: Surface topography measurement instrumentation; in Fundamental Principles of Engineering Nanometrology. Oxford, William Andrew/Amsterdam, Elsevier Science, 2010b, pp 115-176.
20.
Lendenmann U, Grogan J, Oppenheim F: Saliva and dental pellicle - a review. Adv Dent Res 2000;14:22.
21.
Lussi A, Jaeggi T, Zero DT: The role of diet in the aetiology of dental erosion. Caries Res 2004;38(suppl 1):34-44.
22.
Magalhaes AC, Wiegand A, Rios D, Honorio HM, Buzalaf MA: Insights into preventive measures for dental erosion. J Appl Oral Sci 2009;17:75-86.
23.
Moazzez R, Smith BGN, Bartlett DW: Oral pH and drinking habit during ingestion of a carbonated drink in a group of adolescents with dental erosion. J Dent 2000;28:395-397.
24.
O'Sullivan EA, Curzon ME: A comparison of acidic dietary factors in children with and without dental erosion. ASDC J Dent Child 2000;67:186-192, 160.
25.
Siqueira WL, Zhang W, Helmerhorst EJ, Gygi SP, Oppenheim FG: Identification of protein components in in vivo human acquired enamel pellicle using LC-ESI-MS/MS. J Proteome Res 2007;6:2152-2160.
26.
Suga N: Metrology Handbook: The Science of Measurement. Andover, Mitutoyo (UK), 2007.
27.
van't Spijker A, Rodriguez JM, Kreulen CM, Bartlett DW, Creugers NH: Prevalence of tooth wear in adults. Int J Prosthodont 2009;22:35-42.
28.
Van Nieuw Amerongen A, Bolscher JG, Veerman EC: Salivary proteins: protective and diagnostic value in cariology? Caries Res 2004;38:247-253.
29.
Wan Nik W, Banerjee A, Moazzez R: Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms and tooth wear in patients with Sjögren's syndrome. Caries Res 2011;45:323-326.
30.
West NX, Davies M, Amaechi BT: In vitro and in situ erosion models for evaluating tooth substance loss. Caries Res 2011;45:43-52.
31.
Young W, Khan F: Sites of dental erosion are saliva-dependent. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:35-43.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.