Diagnosing the necessity of cavity preparation in demineralized proximal areas has been considered as a challenge in restorative treatment planning. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical performance of a modified radiographic technique for the detection of proximal cavities. The sample consisted of 44 proximal surfaces in 38 dental students. The patients had radiolucent proximal lesions restricted to the inner half of enamel or the outer third of dentine in bitewing radiographs, and there was doubt regarding the presence or absence of cavities in the approximal areas. The suspected surfaces were then examined by secondary bitewing radiographs which were taken after pressing radiopaque material into the proximal areas. Finally, orthodontic elastic separators were placed in the contact areas to provide enough space for direct visual and tactile examination, thus detecting any proximal cavity (reference standard). The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the modified bitewing radiography were calculated against the reference standard. Overall, 7 surfaces presented caries cavities according to the reference standard. All proximal radiolucencies observed in the inner half of enamel and 46% of those extended to the outer third of dentine were not cavitated when evaluated by direct visual and tactile examination. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of bitewing radiography with opaque material for detecting proximal cavities (n = 7) were 86, 100 and 98%, respectively. The tested radiographic technique displayed good validity in this pilot study for detecting proximal cavities in posterior teeth and should be further investigated.

Keywords:
Approximal caries, Bitewing radiography, Caries detection, Caries diagnosis, Proximal caries
1.
Bader JD, Shugars DA: A systematic review of the performance of a laser fluorescence device for detecting caries. J Am Dent Assoc 2004;135:1413-1426.
2.
Baelum V, Hintze H, Wenzel A, Danielsen B, Nyvad B: Implications of caries diagnostic strategies for clinical management decisions. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2012;40:257-266.
3.
Buchalla W, Attin T, Schulte-Monting J, Hellwig E: Fluoride uptake, retention, and remineralization efficacy of a highly concentrated fluoride solution on enamel lesions in situ. J Dent Res 2002;81:329-333.
4.
Chen J, Qin M, Ma W, Ge L: A clinical study of a laser fluorescence device for the detection of approximal caries in primary molars. Int J Paediatr Dent 2012;22:132-138.
5.
Cury JA, Tenuta LM: Enamel remineralization: controlling the caries disease or treating early caries lesions? Braz Oral Res 2009;23(suppl 1):23-30.
6.
de Araujo FB, de Araujo DR, dos Santos CK, de Souza MA: Diagnosis of approximal caries in primary teeth: radiographic versus clinical examination using tooth separation. Am J Dent 1996;9:54-56.
7.
Heymann HO, Swift EJ, Ritter AV: Sturdevant's Art and Science of Operative Dentistry. St Louis, Mosby, 2012, pp 92-104.
8.
Hintze H, Wenzel A, Danielsen B, Nyvad B: Reliability of visual examination, fibre-optic transillumination, and bite-wing radiography, and reproducibility of direct visual examination following tooth separation for the identification of cavitated carious lesions in contacting approximal surfaces. Caries Res 1998;32:204-209.
9.
Hintze H, Wenzel A, Danielsen B: Behaviour of approximal carious lesions assessed by clinical examination after tooth separation and radiography: a 2.5-year longitudinal study in young adults. Caries Res 1999;33:415-422.
10.
Karlsson L: Caries detection methods based on changes in optical properties between healthy and carious tissue. Int J Dent 2010;2010:270729.
11.
Mendes FM, Novaes TF, Matos R, Bittar DG, Piovesan C, Gimenez T, Imparato JC, Raggio DP, Braga MM: Radiographic and laser fluorescence methods have no benefits for detecting caries in primary teeth. Caries Res 2012;46:536-543.
12.
Newman B, Seow WK, Kazoullis S, Ford D, Holcombe T: Clinical detection of caries in the primary dentition with and without bitewing radiography. Aust Dent J 2009;54:23-30.
13.
Novaes TF, Matos R, Braga MM, Imparato JC, Raggio DP, Mendes FM: Performance of a pen-type laser fluorescence device and conventional methods in detecting approximal caries lesions in primary teeth - in vivo study. Caries Res 2009;43:36-42.
14.
Novaes TF, Matos R, Raggio DP, Imparato JC, Braga MM, Mendes FM: Influence of the discomfort reported by children on the performance of approximal caries detection methods. Caries Res 2010;44:465-471.
15.
Novaes TF, Matos R, Celiberti P, Braga MM, Mendes FM: The influence of interdental spacing on the detection of proximal caries lesions in primary teeth. Braz Oral Res 2012a;26:293-299.
16.
Novaes TF, Matos R, Raggio DP, Braga MM, Mendes FM: Children's discomfort in assessments using different methods for approximal caries detection. Braz Oral Res 2012b;26:93-99.
17.
Peker I, Toraman Alkurt M, Bala O, Altunkaynak B: The efficiency of operating microscope compared with unaided visual examination, conventional and digital intraoral radiography for proximal caries detection. Int J Dent 2009;2009:986873.
18.
Rehder Neto FC, Maeda FA, Turssi CP, Serra MC: Potential agents to control enamel caries-like lesions. J Dent 2009;37:786-790.
19.
Tan PL, Evans RW, Morgan MV: Caries, bitewings, and treatment decisions. Aust Dent J 2002;47:138-141, quiz 182.
20.
WIPO: Patent application WO/2012/151464.
© 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel
2013
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.