Incomplete removal of deep caries has been shown to reduce the risks of pulp exposure and postoperative pulpal complications. It is therefore of interest whether dentists perform one- or two-step incomplete excavation, and which criteria and methods they use to assess and provide removal of deep caries. This study investigated the attitudes and behaviour of dentists in northern Germany using a new, validated questionnaire. The survey included 2,346 practitioners, 821 (35%) of whom responded. Demographic and sensitivity analysis did not indicate selection bias. 50% of dentists considered only complete excavation, even if pulp exposure was likely. If caries was to be removed incompletely, 77% considered two-step excavation. Hardness was the most important criterion to assess excavation. To treat an exposed pulp, 75% of dentists considered direct capping, 70% refused incomplete excavation fearing caries progression or pulp damage, and 59% reported to prefer more invasive treatment to facilitate restoration longevity. Over 50% recognised an influence of professional regulations on their treatment decisions. There was a moderate correlation between attitudes and behaviour of dentists, with dentists who suspected residual caries to be harmful rejecting incomplete excavation and vice versa. Cluster analysis identified two groups of dentists with opposite attitudes and behaviour, independently from dentist's age or gender. In conclusion, the majority of surveyed dentists was sceptical about leaving caries during excavation and does not practice incomplete caries removal. Therefore, benefits of partial excavation should be highlighted in under- and postgraduate education and regulatory incentives modified to promote minimally invasive techniques.

Keywords:
Attitudes, Behaviour, Caries, Dentists, Excavation, Incomplete, Partial, Questionnaire, Removal, Survey
1.
Bader JD, Shugars DA: Understanding dentists' restorative treatment decisions. J Public Health Dent 1992;52:102-110.
2.
Bader JD, Shugars DA: What do we know about how dentists make caries-related treatment decisions? Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1997;25:97-103.
3.
Barthel CR, Rosenkranz B, Leuenberg A, Roulet JF: Pulp capping of carious exposures: treatment outcome after 5 and 10 years: a retrospective study. J Endod 2000;26:525-528.
4.
Bergoli AD, Primosch RE, de Araujo FB, Ardenghi TM, Casagrande L: Pulp therapy in primary teeth - profile of teaching in Brazilian dental schools. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2010;35:191-195.
5.
Bjørndal L, Larsen T, Thylstrup A: A clinical and microbiological study of deep carious lesions during stepwise excavation using long treatment intervals. Caries Res 1997;31:411-417.
6.
Bjørndal L, Reit C, Bruun G, Markvart M, Kjældgaard M, Näsman P, Thordrup M, Dige I, Nyvad B, Fransson H, Lager A, Ericson D, Petersson K, Olsson J, Santimano EM, Wennström A, Winkel P, Gluud C: Treatment of deep caries lesions in adults: randomized clinical trials comparing stepwise vs. direct complete excavation, and direct pulp capping vs. partial pulpotomy. Eur J Oral Sci 2010;118:290-297.
7.
Brantley C, Bader J, Shugars D, Nesbit S: Does the cycle of rerestoration lead to larger restorations? J Am Dent Assoc 1995;126:1407-1413.
8.
Brennan DS, Spencer AJ: Service patterns associated with coronal caries in private general dental practice. J Dent 2007;35:570-577.
9.
Carlsson F, Merlo J, Lindström M, Östergren PO, Lithman T: Representativity of a postal public health questionnaire survey in Sweden, with special reference to ethnic differences in participation. Scand J Public Health 2006;34:132-139.
10.
Doméjean-Orliaguet S, Léger S, Auclair C, Gerbaud L, Tubert-Jeannin S: Caries management decision: influence of dentist and patient factors in the provision of dental services. J Dent 2009;37:827-834.
11.
Fejerskov O, Nyvad B, Kidd EAM: Pathology of dental caries; in Fejerskov O, Kidd EAM (eds): Dental Caries: The Disease and Its Clinical Management. Oxford, Blackwell Munksgaard, 2008, vol 2, pp 20-48.
12.
Gordan VV, Riley JL, Geraldeli S, Rindal DB, Qvist V, Fellows JL, Kellum HP, Gilbert GH: Repair or replacement of defective restorations by dentists in the dental practice-based research network. J Am Dent Assoc 2012;143:593-601.
13.
Greenberg BL, Glick M, Frantsve-Hawley J, Kantor ML: Dentists' attitudes toward chairside screening for medical conditions. J Am Dent Assoc 2010;141:52-62.
14.
Gruythuysen R: Non-restorative cavity treatment. Managing rather than masking caries activity. Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd 2010;117:173-180.
15.
Hertrampf K, Wenz HJ, Koller M, Wiltfang J: Comparing dentists' and the public's awareness about oral cancer in a community-based study in Northern Germany. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2012;40:28-32.
16.
Innes N, Evans D, Hall N: The hall technique for managing carious primary molars. Dent Update 2009;36:472-478.
17.
Kidd EAM: How ‘clean' must a cavity be before restoration? Caries Res 2004;38:305-313.
18.
Kidd EA, Ricketts DN, Beighton D: Criteria for caries removal at the enamel-dentine junction: a clinical and microbiological study. Br Dent J 1996;180:287-291.
19.
Leksell E, Ridell K, Cvek M, Mejàre I: Pulp exposure after stepwise versus direct complete excavation of deep carious lesions in young posterior permanent teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol 1996;12:192-196.
20.
Lula ECO, Monteiro-Neto V, Alves CMC, Ribeiro CCC: Microbiological analysis after complete or partial removal of carious dentin in primary teeth: a randomized clinical trial. Caries Res 2009;43:354-358.
21.
Maltz M, Alves LS, Jardim JJ, Moura Mdos S, de Oliveira EF: Incomplete caries removal in deep lesions: a 10-year prospective study. Am J Dent 2011;24:211-214.
22.
Maltz M, de Oliveira EF, Fontanella V, Bianchi R: A clinical, microbiologic, and radiographic study of deep caries lesions after incomplete caries removal. Quintessence Int 2002;33:151-159.
23.
Mejàre I, Sundberg H, Espelid I, Tveit B: Caries assessment and restorative treatment thresholds reported by Swedish dentists. Acta Odontol Scand 1999;57:149-154.
24.
Müller MP, Hänsel M, Stehr SN, Weber S, Koch T: A state-wide survey of medical emergency management in dental practices: incidence of emergencies and training experience. Emerg Med J 2008;25:296-300.
25.
Naumann M, Kiessling S, Seemann R: Treatment concepts for restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a nationwide survey of dentists in Germany. J Prosthet Dent 2006;96:332-338.
26.
Oen KT, Thompson VP, Vena D, Caufield PW, Curro F, Dasanayake A, Ship JA, Lindblad A: Attitudes and expectations of treating deep caries: a PEARL Network survey. Gen Dent 2007;55:197-203.
27.
Qvist V: Longevity of restorations: the ‘death spiral'; in Fejerskov O, Kidd EAM (eds): Dental Caries: The Disease and Its Clinical Management. Oxford, Blackwell Munksgaard, 2008, vol 2, pp 444-455.
28.
Ricketts D: Deep or partial caries removal: which is best? Evid Based Dent 2008;9:71-72.
29.
Riley JL, Gordan VV, Rouisse KM, McClelland J, Gilbert GH: Differences in male and female dentists' practice patterns regarding diagnosis and treatment of dental caries. J Am Dent Assoc 2011;142:429-440.
30.
Schiffner U, Hoffmann T, Kerschbaum T, Micheelis W: Oral health in German children, adolescents, adults and senior citizens in 2005. Community Dent Health 2009;26:18-22.
31.
Schwendicke F, Dörfer CE, Paris S: Incomplete caries removal: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res 2013;92:306-314.
32.
Tavakol M, Dennick R: Making sense of Cronbach's alpha. Int J Med Educ 2011;2:53-55.
33.
Thorpe C, Ryan B, McLean S, Burt A, Stewart M, Brown J, Reid G, Harris S: How to obtain excellent response rates when surveying physicians. Fam Pract 2009;26:65-68.
34.
Weber CM, Alves LS, Maltz M: Treatment decisions for deep carious lesions in the Public Health Service in Southern Brazil. J Public Health Dent 2011;71:265-270.
© 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel
2013
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.