Evidence on the contribution of social support to oral health is scarce. We first explored the association of social support with caries experience and the relative roles of support from family, friends and a special person on caries experience in 15–16-year-old adolescents. We then explored whether social support at 11–12 years of age predicts caries increment in second permanent molars over 4 years and the relative roles of different sources of support on 4-year caries increment. Data from phases 1 and 3 of the Research with East London Adolescents Community Health Survey (RELACHS), a school-based prospective study of a representative sample of adolescents in East London, were used for cross-sectional (phase 3) and longitudinal analyses (phases 1 and 3). Data were collected by questionnaires including the same questions on demographic characteristics, socioeconomic measures and the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support at phases 1 and 3. A questionnaire section on dental behaviours and an oral clinical examination were also included in phase 3. Social support was negatively related to both caries experience and increment independently of demographic characteristics, socioeconomic measures and dental behaviours. Furthermore, only support from a special person was significantly related to caries experience and increment in unadjusted and adjusted regression models. In conclusion, adolescents who perceived higher levels of social support had lower caries experience and increment. However, support from a special person was more relevant for these adolescents than support from family and peers.

Keywords:
Adolescents, Caries experience, Caries increment, Psychosocial factors, Social support
1.
Bartley M, Blane D, Montgomery S: Health and the life course: why safety nets matter. BMJ 1997;314:1194–1196.
2.
Bergdahl M, Bergdahl J: Low unstimulated salivary flow and subjective oral dryness: association with medication, anxiety, depression, and stress. J Dent Res 2000;79:1652–1658.
3.
Berkman LF, Glass T: Social integration, social networks, social support, and health; in Berkman LF, Kawachi I (eds): Social Epidemiology. New York, Oxford University Press, 2000, pp 137–173.
4.
Berkman LF, Glass T, Brissette I, Seeman TE: From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium. Soc Sci Med 2000;51:843–857.
5.
Bosch JA, Turkenburg M, Nazmi K, Veerman EC, de Geus EJ, Nieuw Amerongen AV: Stress as a determinant of saliva-mediated adherence and co-adherence of oral and non-oral microorganisms. Psychosom Med 2003;65:604–612.
6.
Brennan DS, Spencer AJ: Life events and oral-health-related quality of life among young adults. Qual Life Res 2009;18:557–565.
7.
Canty-Mitchell J, Zimet GD: Psychometric properties of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support in urban adolescents. Am J Community Psychol 2000;28:391–400.
8.
Casamassimo PS, Thikkurissy S, Edelstein BL, Maiorini E: Beyond the dmft: the human and economic cost of early childhood caries. J Am Dent Assoc 2009;140:650–657.
9.
Christensen P: The health-promoting family: a conceptual framework for future research. Soc Sci Med 2004;59:377–387.
10.
Cohen S, Syme SL: Issues in the study and adaptation of social support; in Cohen S, Syme SL (eds): Social Support and Health. London, Academic Press, 1985, pp 3–22.
11.
Dahlem NW, Zimet GD, Walker RR: The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support – a Confirmation Study. J Clin Psychol 1991;47:756–761.
12.
De Goede IH, Branje SJ, Delsing MJ, Meeus WH: Linkages over time between adolescents’ relationships with parents and friends. J Youth Adolesc 2009;38:1304–1315.
13.
Dorri M, Sheiham A, Watt R: The influence of peer social networks on toothbrushing behaviour in Iranian adolescents in Mashhad. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2010;38:498–506.
14.
Fisher-Owens SA, Gansky SA, Platt LJ, Weintraub JA, Soobader MJ, Bramlett MD, Newacheck PW: Influences on children’s oral health: a conceptual model. Pediatrics 2007;120:e510–e520.
15.
Furman W, Buhrmester D: Age and sex differences in perceptions of networks of personal relationships. Child Dev 1992;63:103–115.
16.
Hanson BS, Liedberg B, Owall B: Social network, social support and dental status in elderly Swedish men. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1994;22:331–337.
17.
Helsen M, Vollebergh W, Meeus WH: Social support from parents and friends and emotional problems in adolescence. J Youth Adolesc 2000;29:319–335.
18.
Hodge HC, Holloway PJ, Bell CR: Factors associated with toothbrushing behaviour in adolescents. Br Dent J 1982;152:49–51.
19.
Holst D, Schuller AA, Aleksejuniene J, Eriksen HM: Caries in populations – a theoretical, causal approach. Eur J Oral Sci 2001;109:143–148.
20.
Kawachi I, Berkman LF: Social ties and mental health. J Urban Health 2001;78:458–467.
21.
Kazarian SS, McCabe SB: Dimensions of social support in the MSPSS – factorial structure, reliability, and theoretical implications. J Community Psychol 1991;19:150–160.
22.
Laursen B, Bukowski WM: A developmental guide to the organisation of close relationships. Int J Behav Dev 1997;21:747–770.
23.
Nicolau B, Netuveli G, Kim JW, Sheiham A, Marcenes W: A life-course approach to assess psychosocial factors and periodontal disease. J Clin Periodontol 2007;34:844–850.
24.
Pattussi MP, Olinto MT, Hardy R, Sheiham A: Clinical, social and psychosocial factors associated with self-rated oral health in Brazilian adolescents. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2007;35:377–386.
25.
Petersen PE, Bourgeois D, Ogawa H, Estupinan-Day S, Ndiaye C: The global burden of oral diseases and risks to oral health. Bull World Health Organ 2005;83:661–669.
26.
Rueger SY, Malecki CK, Demaray MK: Relationship between multiple sources of perceived social support and psychological and academic adjustment in early adolescence: comparisons across gender. J Youth Adolesc 2010;39:47–61.
27.
Russell MW, Hajishengallis G, Childers NK, Michalek SM: Secretory immunity in defense against cariogenic mutans streptococci. Caries Res 1999;33:4–15.
28.
Sanders AE, Spencer AJ: Childhood circumstances, psychosocial factors and the social impact of adult oral health. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2005;33:370–377.
29.
Selwitz RH, Ismail AI, Pitts NB: Dental caries. Lancet 2007;369:51–59.
30.
Stansfeld SA: Social support and social cohesion; in Marmot M, Wilkinson RG (eds): Social Determinants of Health. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2006, pp 148–171.
31.
Stansfeld SA, Haines M, Booy R, Taylor S, Viner R, Head J, Bhui K, Hillier S, Isenwater W, Choudhry-Dormer S, Brentnall S, Klineberg E, Ahmed G: Health of young people in East London: The RELACHS Study 2001. London, The Stationery Office (TSO), 2003.
32.
Teeuw W, Bosch JA, Veerman EC, Amerongen AV: Neuroendocrine regulation of salivary IgA synthesis and secretion: implications for oral health. Biol Chem 2004;385:1137–1146.
33.
Uchino BN: Social support and health: a review of physiological processes potentially underlying links to disease outcomes. J Behav Med 2006;29:377–387.
34.
Uchino BN, Cacioppo JT, Kiecolt-Glaser JK: The relationship between social support and physiological processes: a review with emphasis on underlying mechanisms and implications for health. Psychol Bull 1996;119:488–531.
35.
WHO: Oral Health Surveys: Basic Methods, ed 4th. Geneva, World Health Organization, 1997.
36.
Zimet GD, Dahlem NW, Zimet SG, Farley GK: The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. J Pers Assess 1988;52:30–41.
37.
Zimet GD, Powell SS, Farley GK, Werkman S, Berkoff KA: Psychometric characteristics of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. J Pers Assess 1990;55:610–617.
© 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel
2011
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.