This in vivo study aimed to evaluate the performance of 2 fluorescence-based methods in detecting occlusal caries lesions in primary teeth, compared with the performance of visual inspection and radiographic methods, and to propose a mathematic correction of the diagnostic parameters due to the imperfect reference standard method used in the study. Two examiners assessed the occlusal surfaces of 407 primary teeth (62 children) using visual inspection (ICDAS), radiographic, DIAGNOdent pen (pen type laser fluorescence; LFpen), and fluorescence camera (FC) methods. At the noncavitated threshold (NC) the reference standard method was the results of ICDAS, and at the dentine caries threshold (D3) teeth diagnosed with dentine caries by ICDAS or radiographic methods were subjected to operative treatment to confirm the presence of lesion. Reproducibility, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and the area under the ROC curve were calculated for the methods at both thresholds. At the NC threshold, LFpen had a slightly better performance compared to the FC and radiographic methods. However, at the D3 threshold, both fluorescence-based methods performed similarly. Visual inspection and radiographic methods presented higher specificities but lower sensitivities than fluorescence methods. After corrections, there was a significant decrease in some parameters. In conclusion, both fluorescence-based methods presented similar performance in detecting occlusal dentine caries lesions in primary teeth, but they usually gave more false-positive results than did the visual and radiographic methods. The correction proposed shows that the performance of the methods can be overestimated, and the correction should be validated and considered in further studies that use an imprecise reference standard method.

Keywords:
Dental caries, Fluorescence, Occlusal surfaces, Primary teeth, Sensitivity, Specificity
1.
Abalos C, Herrera M, Jimenez-Planas A, Llamas R: Performance of laser fluorescence for detection of occlusal dentinal caries lesions in permanent molars: an in vivo study with total validation of the sample. Caries Res 2009;43:137–141.
2.
Bader JD, Shugars DA: A systematic review of the performance of a laser fluorescence device for detecting caries. J Am Dent Assoc 2004;135:1413–1426.
3.
Bader JD, Shugars DA, Bonito AJ: A systematic review of the performance of methods for identifying carious lesions. J Public Health Dent 2002;62:201–213.
4.
Baelum V: What is an appropriate caries diagnosis? Acta Odontol Scand 2010;68:65–79.
5.
Braga MM, Mendes FM, Ekstrand KR: Detection activity assessment and diagnosis of dental caries lesions. Dent Clin North Am 2010;54:479–493.
6.
Braga MM, Mendes FM, Martignon S, Ricketts DN, Ekstrand KR: In vitro comparison of Nyvad’s system and ICDAS-II with Lesion Activity Assessment for evaluation of severity and activity of occlusal caries lesions in primary teeth. Caries Res 2009;43:405–412.
7.
Brenner H: Correcting for exposure misclassification using an alloyed gold standard. Epidemiology 1996;7:406–410.
8.
De Benedetto MS, Morais CC, Novaes TF, de Almeida Rodrigues J, Braga MM, Mendes FM: Comparing the reliability of a new fluorescence camera with conventional laser fluorescence devices in detecting caries lesions in occlusal and smooth surfaces of primary teeth. Lasers Med Sci 2011;26:157–162.
9.
Diniz MB, Rodrigues JA, Hug I, Cordeiro Rde C, Lussi A: Reproducibility and accuracy of the ICDAS-II for occlusal caries detection. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2009;37:399–404.
10.
Durkalski VL, Palesch YY, Lipsitz SR, Rust PF: Analysis of clustered matched-pair data. Stat Med 2003;22:2417–2428.
11.
Ekstrand KR: Improving clinical visual detection – potential for caries clinical trials. J Dent Res 2004;83:C67–C71.
12.
Ekstrand KR, Ricketts DN, Kidd EA, Qvist V, Schou S: Detection, diagnosing, monitoring and logical treatment of occlusal caries in relation to lesion activity and severity: an in vivo examination with histological validation. Caries Res 1998;32:247–254.
13.
Huth KC, Neuhaus KW, Gygax M, Bucher K, Crispin A, Paschos E, Hickel R, Lussi A: Clinical performance of a new laser fluorescence device for detection of occlusal caries lesions in permanent molars. J Dent 2008;36:1033–1040.
14.
Irwig LM, Bossuyt PM, Glasziou PP, Gatsonis C, Knottnerus JA: Designing studies to ensure that estimates of test accuracy will travel; in Knottnerus JA (ed): The Evidence Base of Clinical Diagnosis. London, BMJ Books, 2002, pp 95–116.
15.
Ismail AI, Sohn W, Tellez M, Amaya A, Sen A, Hasson H, Pitts NB: The International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS): an integrated system for measuring dental caries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2007;35:170–178.
16.
Jablonski-Momeni A, Stachniss V, Ricketts DN, Heinzel-Gutenbrunner M, Pieper K: Reproducibility and accuracy of the ICDAS-II for detection of occlusal caries in vitro. Caries Res 2008;42:79–87.
17.
Kavvadia K, Lagouvardos P: Clinical performance of a diode laser fluorescence device for the detection of occlusal caries in primary teeth. Int J Paediatr Dent 2008;18:197–204.
18.
Kidd EA, Banerjee A, Ferrier S, Longbottom C, Nugent Z: Relationships between a clinical-visual scoring system and two histological techniques: a laboratory study on occlusal and approximal carious lesions. Caries Res 2003;37:125–129.
19.
Krause F, Jepsen S, Braun A: Comparison of two laser fluorescence devices for the detection of occlusal caries in vivo. Eur J Oral Sci 2007;115:252–256.
20.
Lijmer JG, Mol BW, Heisterkamp S, Bonsel GJ, Prins MH, van der Meulen JH, Bossuyt PM: Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests. JAMA 1999;282:1061–1066.
21.
Lussi A, Hellwig E: Performance of a new laser fluorescence device for the detection of occlusal caries in vitro. J Dent 2006;34:467–471.
22.
Lussi A, Megert B, Longbottom C, Reich E, Francescut P: Clinical performance of a laser fluorescence device for detection of occlusal caries lesions. Eur J Oral Sci 2001;109:14–19.
23.
Mortimer KV: The relationship of deciduous enamel structure to dental disease. Caries Res 1970;4:206–223.
24.
Rao JN, Scott AJ: A simple method for the analysis of clustered binary data. Biometrics 1992;48:577–585.
25.
Reis A, Mendes FM, Angnes V, Angnes G, Grande RH, Loguercio AD: Performance of methods of occlusal caries detection in permanent teeth under clinical and laboratory conditions. J Dent 2006;34:89–96.
26.
Rocha RO, Ardenghi TM, Oliveira LB, Rodrigues CRMD, Ciamponi AL: In vivo effectiveness of laser fluorescence compared to visual inspection and radiography for the detection of occlusal caries in primary teeth. Caries Res 2003;37:437–441.
27.
Rodrigues JA, Hug I, Diniz MB, Lussi A: Performance of fluorescence methods, radiographic examination and ICDAS II on occlusal surfaces in vitro. Caries Res 2008;42:297–304.
28.
Shellis RP: Relationship between human enamel structure and the formation of caries-like lesions in vitro. Arch Oral Biol 1984;29:975–981.
29.
Thoms M: Detection of intraoral lesions using a fluorescence camera. Proc SPIE Lasers Dentistry XII 2006;6137:613705.
© 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel
2011
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.