Background: It has been suggested that oral organisms in children are mainly those transmitted from their mothers. That may account for the relationship between caries levels in children and their parents. However, few studies have investigated the effect of trying to prevent vertical transmission of oral organisms on dental caries levels in children, and the findings in the studies are controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between measures to prevent vertical transmission of oral organisms and the caries experience in 3-year-old children. Methods: Data were collected from dental examinations for 3-year-old children and a self-administered questionnaire for their caregivers. Absence of maternal sharing of utensils and mouth-to-mouth feeding between caregivers and children was used as the variable about behaviour to prevent vertical transmission of oral organisms. Sex, age in months, dietary behaviour, oral health behaviour and sociodemographic factors were used as covariates. Results and Conclusion: Data for 3,035 children (73.5% of the subjects) were analysed. Caregivers who practised vertical transmission prevention tended to have better oral health behaviours. Multivariate logistic regression analysis did not show any significant association between behaviour to prevent vertical transmission and caries experience (OR = 1.10, 95% CI = 0.86–1.41). This study suggests that caregiver behaviour to prevent vertical transmission was not effective in reducing levels of childhood caries.

Keywords:
Caries prevention, Epidemiology, Preschool children, Caregiver behaviour
1.
Aida J, Ando Y, Oosaka M, Niimi K, Morita M: Contributions of social context to inequality in dental caries: a multilevel analysis of Japanese 3-year-old children. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2008;36:149–156.
2.
Balakrishnan M, Simmonds RS, Tagg JR: Dental caries is a preventable infectious disease. Aust Dent J 2000;45:235–245.
3.
Chan KM, King NM, Kilpatri NM: Can infants catch caries? A review of the current evidence on the infectious nature of dental caries in infants. NZ Dent J 2005;101:4–11.
4.
Cogulu D, Ersin NK, Uzel A, Eronat N, Aksit S: A long-term effect of caries-related factors in initially caries-free children. Int J Paediatr Dent 2008;18:361–367.
5.
Dye BA, Vargas CM, Lee JJ, Magder L, Tinanoff N: Assessing the relationship between children’s oral health status and that of their mothers. J Am Dent Assoc 2011;142:173–183.
6.
Ersin NK, Eronat N, Cogulu D, Uzel A, Aksit S: Association of maternal-child characteristics as a factor in early childhood caries and salivary bacterial counts. J Dent Child (Chic) 2006;73:105–111.
7.
Gillcrist JA, Brumley DE, Blackford JU: Community socioeconomic status and children’s dental health. J Am Dent Assoc 2001;132:216–222.
8.
Japanese Society of Pediatric Dentistry: Breast feeding and dental caries. www.jspd.or.jp/public/about_pediatrics_03.htm, 2008.
9.
Japanese Society of Pediatric Dentistry: For you and your baby. www.jspd.or.jp/img/public/ninpu_o.pdf, 2009.
10.
Kishi M, Abe A, Kishi K, Ohara-Nemoto Y, Kimura S, Yonemitsu M: Relationship of quantitative salivary levels of Streptococcus mutans and S. sobrinus in mothers to caries status and colonization of mutans streptococci in plaque in their 2.5-year-old children. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2009;37:241–249.
11.
Kopycka-Kedzierawski DT, Billings RJ: A longitudinal study of caries onset in initially caries-free children and baseline salivary mutans streptococci levels: a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2004;32:201–209.
12.
Kristoffersson K, Birkhed D: Effects of partial sugar restriction for 6 weeks on numbers of Streptococcus mutans in saliva and interdental plaque in man. Caries Res 1987;21:79–86.
13.
Li Y, Caufield PW, Dasanayake AP, Wiener HW, Vermund SH: Mode of delivery and other maternal factors influence the acquisition of Streptococcus mutans in infants. J Dent Res 2005;84:806–811.
14.
Maciel SM, Marcenes W, Watt RG, Sheiham A: The relationship between sweetness preference and dental caries in mother/child pairs from Maringá-Pr, Brazil. Int Dent J 2001;51:83–88.
15.
Milgrom P, Riedy CA, Weinstein P, Tanner AC, Manibusan L, Bruss J: Dental caries and its relationship to bacterial infection, hypoplasia, diet, and oral hygiene in 6- to 36-month-old children. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2000;28:295–306.
16.
Sabbah W, Tsakos G, Sheiham A, Watt RG: The role of health-related behaviours in the socioeconomic disparities in oral health. Soc Sci Med 2009;68:298–303.
17.
Tagliaferro EP, Pereira AC, Meneghim M de C, Ambrosano GM: Assessment of dental caries predictors in a seven-year longitudinal study. J Public Health Dent 2006;66:169–173.
18.
van Houte J: Role of micro-organisms in caries etiology. J Dent Res 1994;73:672–681.
19.
Victora CG, Vaughan JP, Barros FC, Silva AC, Tomasi E: Explaining trends in inequities: evidence from Brazilian child health studies. Lancet 2000;356:1093–1098.
20.
Wan AK, Seow WK, Purdie DM, Bird PS, Walsh LJ, Tudehope DI: Oral colonization of Streptococcus mutans in six-month-old predentate infants. J Dent Res 2001;80:2060–2065.
21.
Wan AK, Seow WK, Purdie DM, Bird PS, Walsh LJ, Tudehope DI: A longitudinal study of Streptococcus mutans colonization in infants after tooth eruption. J Dent Res 2003;82:504–508.
22.
Warren JJ, Weber-Gasparoni K, Marshall TA, Drake DR, Dehkordi-Vakil F, Dawson DV, Tharp KM: A longitudinal study of dental caries risk among very young low SES children. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2009;37:116–122.
23.
World Health Organization: Oral Health Survey – Basic Methods, ed 4. Geneva, World Health Organization, 1997.
© 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel
2011
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.