The aim was to assess the validity of laser fluorescence (LF), visual inspection and surface texture on root caries lesions in vitro, related to histological lesion depths. Agreement on interdevice, interexaminer and intra-examiner levels as well as the influence of discolouration and surface texture on LF readings were investigated. Calibrated examiners assessed lesion colour and surface texture and performed measurements with 2 LF devices in 3 separate series at intervals of 1 week. Sections (300 μm thick) of 64 out of 93 teeth were obtained and examined under the microscope. Lesion depth was assessed with 2 references: from the delineated borderline of the original exposed root surface (ref. I), or if loss of surface continuity, the absolute lesion depth (ref. II). The correlation (Spearman ρ) between LF readings and histological depth was low with values ranging from 0.22 (p > 0.05) to 0.31 (p < 0.05). LF 1 and LF 2 were significantly correlated with discolouration (ρ = 0.52 and 0.46, respectively) and with surface texture denoted as hard (ρ = 0.34 and 0.33, respectively). A significant correlation between colour and histological depth ref. I (ρ = 0.51) and ref. II (ρ = 0.56) was found. No significant correlation between surface texture and histological depth was found. The reliability, evaluated as intraclass correlation coefficient was for intra-examiner 0.99, interexaminer 0.97 and interdevice level 0.98. Large differences were found between 2 consecutive measurements, and high measurement errors indicated considerable deviation of individual measurements. Based on these findings, the LF device is not suitable as a diagnostic tool for root caries.

Keywords:
Caries detection, DIAGNOdent, Optical method, Repeatability, Reproducibility, Root caries
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel
2009
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.