The aim of this 3-year longitudinal study was to analyze caries increment and the caries-preventive effect of sealants in adolescents in the setting of the German national health system. 434 pupils (193 male, 241 female) took part in compulsory school examinations at age 12 (mean 12.3 ± 0.4 years) and 15 (mean 15.6 ± 0.3 years) according to WHO criteria, including the examination of sealants. Mean DMFT increased from 1.78 (± 2.15) to 3.97 (± 3.68), mean DMFS from 2.79 (±4.07) to 6.94 DMFS (± 8.34), respectively. Logistic regression analysis showed that high caries incidence at the individual level was mostly associated with the type of school (’Gymnasium’, RR = 0.3), gender (female, RR = 2.08) and high baseline DMFS (RR = 1.2 per surface), but not with the number of sealants. In an interaction model, adolescents with high baseline DMFS values had an even higher risk of caries increment with an increasing number of sealants compared to adolescents with fewer sealants (p = 0.047). At the tooth level, this effect was detected for first permanent molars, while sealants in premolars and second permanent molars did not result in a statistically significant caries-preventive effect due to the low caries incidence on these surfaces. Thus, sealants on occlusal surfaces of first permanent molars were only protective in individuals with low or moderate caries activity (p = 0.006), which indicates the need for other measures to reduce caries activity in high risk adolescents. In addition, rates of 19% lost sealants and 18% carious or filled surfaces in 3 years suggest a discrepancy between sealant retention under real-life conditions and the results of controlled clinical trials.

Keywords:
Caries prevalence, adolescence, Sealants, effectiveness
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel
2006
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.