The aim was to study remineralization in dentin underneath a biofilm. This was done in a constant depth film fermentor (CDFF) which was modified so that two treatments can be applied simultaneously in one experiment. Forty-five Streptococcus mutans biofilms were grown in grooves in dentin. Growth medium (3.7 g/l BHI, 1.5 mM calcium and 25 mM PIPES) was administered alternately with 2% sucrose pulsing 4 × 30 min/day. Fluoride at 135 ppm as NaF only or in a mixture with 0.2% chlorhexidine was applied for 2 × 5 min/day. The treatments started 5 days after inoculation and lasted 15 days. Five specimens per group were removed at various time points. The biofilms were checked for viability (by plating) and acid content (by capillary electrophoresis). The dentin specimens were analysed for mineral loss and lesion depth (by transversal microradiography). Fluoride treatment had no effect on the viability but reduced lactic acid production by 75%. The mixture treatment reduced the viability by 80% and the lactic acid content by 93% on the first day and later reduced the two parameters to below the detection limits. Significant differences in changes in mineral loss and lesion depth were observed between the treatment groups. Partial remineralization but deeper lesions were observed in the fluoride group, while nearly complete remineralization was seen in the mixture group. In conclusion, the CDFF S. mutans biofilm model can be used as a de- and remineralization biofilm model, and the split mode is particularly suitable for testing caries-preventive agents.

Keywords:
Remineralization, Biofilm in vitro model, Fluoride, Chlorhexidine, Organic acid
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel
2005
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.