Direct or in situ methods (e.g., confocal microscopy, microsensors) are used to study non-oral biofilms for almost two decades, and they have recently been introduced in the research of dental plaque. We combined a pH microsensor technique and transversal microradiography (TMR) in a pilot study where the effects of nutrient availability on plaque acidogenicity and on the development of caries-like lesions were assessed. One volunteer accumulated dental plaque for 7 days in 0.2-mm-wide and 0.8-mm-deep dentin grooves at four conditions: (1) saliva only, (2) 8 × 5 min/day dipping in 10% sucrose solution, (3) 7 × 5 min/day consumption of sweet cookies plus one meal/day, and (4) subject’s regular diet. Plaque pH versus time and depth profiles in the grooves were recorded ex vivo before and after sugar challenge. ‘Saliva’ plaque responded to sugar with slow pH decrease – minimum pH 5.6–5.8 was reached after 30 min, while sugar dipping resulted in metabolically active plaque (minimum pH 5.3–5.5 within 4–8 min). TMR analysis revealed no demineralization after these two periods. Metabolically active plaque leading to distinct lesions resulted from frequent plaque exposure to diets rich in starch and carbohydrates (groups 3 and 4). These findings strengthen the view that the plaque acidogenicity does not necessarily reflect cariogenicity, and that retention of food components may account for increased cariogenicity at plaque retention sites in the mouth.

Keywords:
Dental plaque biofilm, pH, Nutrients, Demineralization
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel
2003
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.