The aim of this in vitro study was to assess the diagnostic performance of five methods of using the Electrical Caries Monitor (ECM) to detect caries lesions at enamel and dentine thresholds in occlusal molar surfaces with and without stain. Histological validation was performed in 152 occlusal sites in permanent molar teeth. For the sites without stain the areas under the ROC curve (AUC) for the five methods ranged from 0.69 to 0.93 (enamel) and 0.74 to 0.92 (dentine). For stained sites the AUC ranged from 0.59 to 0.65 (enamel) and 0.66 to 0.77 (dentine). The performance of the ECM was reduced in the presence of stain. The measurements using toothpaste as a conducting medium were generally worse than when direct measurements were taken. The profiles of the resistance curves generated as the tooth was dried for 5 s were used to derive additional summary variables. The AUC for all sites using an outcome variable generated from these data were 0.89 (enamel) and 0.91 (dentine), respectively, for all teeth. It is concluded that the performance of the ECM might be improved by either considering a combination of variables or using different resistance cut-offs in the presence or absence of stain.

Keywords:
Detection, Electrical Caries Monitor, Electrical resistance, Occlusal caries, Stain
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel
2003
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.