The objective of this study was to evaluate a new chemo–mechanical method (Carisolv™) for the removal of primary root caries in vivo in terms of efficiency, treatment time and patient perception. Thirty–eight patients participated in an open, randomised and controlled study. Of the 60 root carious lesions included, 34 were randomised for chemo–mechanical treatment and 26 for drilling. A within–subject comparison was used whenever the patient had two cavities, which was the case for 22 subjects. All the Carisolv–treated cavities became caries free, as did all but one of those treated with drilling, as judged by an independent examiner. Only 4 of 34 patients asked for anaesthesia in the Carisolv group compared with 6 of 26 patients in the drilling group. Of those who did not use anaesthesia, 12 individuals in the drilling group experienced some pain compared with none in the chemo–mechanical group (p<0.001). The mean treatment time for the Carisolv method was 5.9 ± 2.2 min, compared with 4.5 ± 2.0 min for drilling; time for anaesthesia excluded (p<0.05). No negative reactions or adverse effects were recorded during the study. All 55 teeth examined in the 1–year follow–up were found to be sensitive using an electric pulp tester, and there was no difference regarding the condition of fillings between the lesions treated with Carisolv and drilling. It can be concluded that root caries can be effectively removed using the Carisolv method. The longer treatment time was compensated by less need for anaesthesia.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.