Currently our intra–oral model uses enamel specimens that have been disinfected by soaking in buffered formalin (pH 6.8). However, because of increasing emphasis on infection control, it is important to identify a way to sterilize these specimens. The aim of this study was to determine if autoclaved, or gas sterilized, lesioned enamel responds to fluoride (F) in the same way alcohol–disinfected enamel lesions do. Seventy–two formalin–disinfected, human enamel specimens (3 mm) were lesioned in demineralizing solution for 96 h and were then divided into three groups. One group was autoclaved; one group was gas sterilized (ethylene oxide), and the remaining 24 specimens were further disinfected in 70% ethanol for 10 min. Specimens in each group were then treated 4 times/day for 4 weeks with 0, 250 or 1,100 ppm F dentifrice slurries in an in vitro cycling, remin/demin model. Following treatment, fluoride uptake was analyzed by microdrill biopsy, and lesion depth and mineral content changes (ΔM) were determined by transverse microradiography. Data were analyzed by one–way ANOVA analysis. In all three groups of specimens there were significant (p<0.05) differences in fluoride uptake in response to different fluoride treatments. Autoclaved lesions failed to provide dose– response data with regard to changes in lesion mineral content. Because formalin and 70% alcohol are only disinfectants, and autoclaving altered the responsiveness of enamel lesions, results from this study suggest that, of the methods tested, gas sterilization is the preferred method for sterilizing enamel specimens that will be used in intra–oral studies.

Keywords:
Fluoride, Dose response, Enamel, Sterilization
This content is only available via PDF.
2000
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.