In studies about 15–25% of the caries–free teeth proved to have as low electrical resistance values as carious teeth, due probably to incomplete enamel maturation. It was the aim of the present prospective clinical study to investigate, if an increase in electrical resistance values could be observed after the eruption of premolars. The electrical resistance measurements were performed in children who were patients of the Dental School of the University of Marburg, Germany. The first measurement was made when a premolar was erupting or when it had erupted within 12 months before. The electrical resistance measurements were repeated every 3–6 months until the 24th posteruptive month. The measuring device consisted of an AC ohmmeter modified by Gente indicating the real component of the impedance and employing a frequency of 500 Hz and an amplitude of about 1 μA. For erupting teeth a mean resistance value of 17±15 kohm was computed when the contact fluid had been NaCl (A). The corresponding values were 72±51 kohm when distilled water (B) had been applied and 392±374 kohm when the initially saliva–coated teeth had briefly been dried (C). The mean resistance values of the premolars increased continuously from the eruption up to the 15th posteruptive month. This observation was independent of the three modes of measuring that had been used. It is concluded that enamel maturation leads to an increase in electrical resistance. To improve accuracy of caries diagnosis with electrical resistance measurements, the posteruptive age of teeth should be taken into account. In addition, electrical resistance measurements offer the opportunity to observe enamel maturation in vivo noninvasively.

Keywords:
Dental caries, Diagnostic systems, Electrical resistance, Enamel maturation
This content is only available via PDF.
1999
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.