Fluoride can inhibit caries at plaque-retention sites, but some studies indicate that fluoride is less effective in fissures than on smooth surfaces. To study the efficacy of fluoridated toothpastes at plaque-retention sites, an intra-oral model was used with bovine coronal dentine discs, in which grooves of two different widths were sawn. The discs were mounted in the partial prostheses of 31 participants divided into two groups. One group brushed with a non-fluoridated toothpaste and a second with a paste containing 1,000 ppm fluoride as NaF After 3 months, the specimens were retrieved and from each a thin section was taken for microradiographic analysis. Lesions which developed in the grooves resembled natural lesions in terms of the presence of a surface layer and the mineral content profiles. Extensive lesions followed the direction of the dentinal tubules. The mineral loss was quantified half-way into and at the base of the grooves and ranged from 0 to 20,000 vol% × μm. Analysis of variance showed that the mineral loss was significantly influenced by the treatment and the width of the grooves (p < 0.001). In the broad grooves the average mineral loss was 19% smaller in the fluoride group than in the non-fluoride group, in the narrow grooves this value was 7%. Taking the two treatment groups together, the average mineral loss was largest half-way into the broad grooves (4,921 vol% × μm) and smallest at the base of the narrow grooves (2,289 vol% × μm). The results with this new intra-oral model indicate that the dimensions of small grooves in dentine, and thus their accessibility, determine not only their susceptibility to caries but also the protective effect of a fluoridated toothpaste.

Keywords:
Caries, Dentine, Fluoride, Grooves, Toothpaste
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1997 S. Karger AG, Basel
1997
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.