There has been renewed interest in the electronic diagnosis of occlusal caries using measurement of conductance or impedance. One of two previously manufactured electronic caries detectors (the Vanguard electronic caries detector, Massachusetts Manufacturing Corporation, Cambridge, Mass., USA) had a probe tip with an integral air supply. Airflow is essential for removing superficial moisture and preventing surface conduction to the gingival margin. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of airflow on electronic diagnosis of occlusal caries using a prototype electronic caries meter (ECM II. LODE, Groningen, The Netherlands) fitted with a flow meter. Stable conductance readings were taken at 76 discrete sites on 32 extracted teeth with no visible signs of cavitation, at 3 airflows: 5, 7.5 and 10 litres/min. The stable conductance scale was a continuous scale from ––0.45 to 13.25 and set by the manufacturer. Histological validation was carried out on macroradiographs of sections cut to include each sample site. The histological picture was compared with the stable conductance readings taken at various airflows. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated using different conductance readings to differentiate sound and carious sites, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves constructed. Of the sites, 32% had enamel and dentine caries and 33% had enamel caries. The ROC curves showed airflow to be highly relevant. An airflow of 5 litres/min was shown to be inadequate and led to large numbers of false-positive diagnoses. A minimum airflow of 7.5 litres/min was required to achieve optimum sensitivity (92%) and specificity (87%) for dentine caries diagnosis.

Keywords:
Diagnosis, Electrical resistance, Occlusal caries
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1997 S. Karger AG, Basel
1997
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.