We evaluated caries increment in connection with salivary caries-related findings and dental status in teenagers by carrying out a retrospective follow-up, lasting on average 28 months. A total of 66 adolescents, mean age 15.2 years, were selected by their susceptibility to caries, as clinically defined at a routine checkup. Their baseline DMFT was 5.7, compared to 4.3 in the root population of 230 patients. Increment of caries on selected surfaces (ΔDFSs) included new caries reaching the dentine and new fillings done due to such caries. ΔDFSs > 0 was taken as the validation criterion to define a caries case. Screening criteria for salivary tests were set as follows: flow rate of unstimulated saliva less than 0.2 ml/min, and of stimulated saliva less than 1.0 ml/min; buffering capacity: final pH below 4.5, mutans streptococci (SM) score of 2 or 3 (≥ 105 CFU/ml), and lactobacilli (LB) score of 5 or 6 (≥105 CFU/ml). Mean ΔDFSs per subject was 1.1, with 70% of these new DF findings being on occlusal surfaces. ΔDFSs was correlated with LB (0.31) for both genders, for boys only with buffering capacity (––0.34), and for girls only with flow rate of stimulated saliva (––0.28) and DMFT (0.35). The highest sensitivities of salivary tests for caries were shown by LB (0.82) and SM (0.64), their specificities being 0.63 and 0.59, respectively. Positive predictive values of the five tests varied between 0.69 and 0.89. Predictions based on DMFT showed a sensitivity of 0.87 for DMFT > 3, but only of 0.33 for DMFT > 7, the corresponding specificities being 0.44 and 0.81.

Keywords:
Dental caries, DMF teeth, Lactobacilli, Mutans streptococci, Risk of developing caries, Salivary flow rate, Salivary tests
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1996 S. Karger AG, Basel
1996
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.