The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between salivary mutans streptococcus (SMS) levels and the prevalence and incidence of dental caries in 148 children (mean baseline age 3.8 years) of low socioeconomic status. Caries data (dmfs) and semiquantitative SMS counts were obtained at baseline and annually for 2 years. The children were classified during each of the 3 years as low (0 colony-forming units; CFU), moderate (1–50 CFU), or high ( > 50 CFU) caries risk based on total SMS counts. The results indicated that the prevalence of dental caries increased with SMS levels at baseline and generally in both assessment years. At baseline the mean dmfs of the children classified as low, moderate, or high caries risk was 0.15,1.44, and 3.36, respectively, while the mean dmfs of the same children at year 2 was 1.18, 3.10, and 7.87, respectively. The mean dmfs of the high-caries-risk group increased by 79% between baseline and year 1 and by 30%between year 1 and year 2. At year 2,50% of the children in the low- and 47% in the moderate-caries-risk groups were caries free as compared with 11% in the high-caries-risk group. Thirty-three percent of the children examined remained in the same caries risk category from baseline to year 2; the incidence (▵dmfs) of dental caries in those children designated as low, moderate, and high caries risk during this period was 1.44, 3.36, and 10.07, respectively. The results indicate that there is an association between SMS levels and prevalence and incidence of dental caries in the primary teeth of these children and suggest that SMS levels may be useful in predicting the caries risk in the deciduous dentition of some populations.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.