The diameter of dentinal tubules after demineralization and/or air drying has been quantified using light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The tubule diameter was assessed at a distance of about 1.5 mm (range 1.0–2.0 mm) from the pulp. Tubule diameter was measured in the wet state, after 10-min and 12-hour air drying as well as after critical point drying CO2) by SEM. The results show that drying effects on tubule diameter are small in sound tissue, but are sizeable in demineralized dentine. Comparing light microscopic (wet) and SEM observations show that the differences in tubule diameter are small for sound but substantial for demineralized dentine. An important result is that in the wet state the diameters of the tubules (being 1.3 ± 0.2 μm in sound dentine) are 2.5 ± 0.3,2.2 ± 0.3 and 1.7 ± 0.2 μm after 1, 2 and 3 weeks of demineralization, respectively. The decreased tubule diameter with increasing demineralization may be important for permeability and transport phenomena in dentine caries and presumably in hypersensitivity.

Keywords:
Dentine, Drying, Shrinkage, Tubules
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1995 S. Karger AG, Basel
1995
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.