Xylitol and sorbitol are effective as non-cariogenic sugar substitutes. A number of studies suggest that xylitol may have an additional, caries-reducing effect. This study examines the effect of xylitol and sorbitol, when pulsed together with glucose, on the composition and metabolism of a mixed culture of oral bacteria grown in a chemostat. In this system, xylitol had the effect of reducing the rate and extent of acid production when pulsed with glucose, compared with glucose pulsed alone, enabling acid-sensitive species to persist in greater numbers. Furthermore, the enrichment of Streptococcus mutans, observed following glucose pulses in the absence of pH control, was prevented by xylitol. In contrast, sorbitol had the opposite effects and S. mutans increased in proportion. The study provides evidence for a mechanism by which xylitol could affect the ecology of dental plaque and thereby reduce the rate of dental caries.

Keywords:
Acid production, Caries prevention, Glucose, Mixed cultures, PH, Plaque ecology, Sorbitol, Streptococcus mutans, Xylitol
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1994 S. Karger AG, Basel
1994
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.