The microflora of root carious lesions (n = 151) and sound root surfaces (n = 30) in 22 institutionalized, older patients was investigated using a standardized method of sampling. Material was removed using a sterile excavator and the numbers of bacteria in each sample were determined using conventional culturing techniques and by rapid (2 h) fluorogenic enzyme assay. Correlation between bacterial counts and enzyme assay result was 0.873 (p < 0.001). The numbers of bacteria and fluorogenic enzyme assay values were significantly (p < 0.001) greater from soft lesions than from leathery lesions while hard lesions and sound root surfaces had significantly (p < 0.001) lower values than the other lesion types and were not different from each other. A similar trend was apparent when these values were correlated with treatment needs. The fluorogenic enzyme assay may provide a rapid objective measure of root caries severity which might be used in the monitoring and comparison of treatment protocols.

Keywords:
Bacterial enumeration, Fluorogenic assays, Lactobacilli, Mutans streptococci, Root caries, Treatment needs
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1993 S. Karger AG, Basel
1993
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.