Local passive immunization has been suggested as a method of preventing colonization of teeth by mutans streptococci. In this study we describe the effect of local application of monoclonal antibodies (Mabs) on the colonization of Streptococcus sobrinus. The rats, 37 days old, were divided in 4 groups: group 1 received Mab OMVU10 (Mab reactive with Antigen B of S. sobrinus, IgG2b), group 2 received Clone 24 (Mab reactive with lipid A of Escherichia coli, IgG2b), group 3 received uninoculated culture medium, and group 4 received phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Mabs were applied 6 times on the surfaces of the molars and the labial surfaces of the incisors of the rats, on days 37, 40, 44, 46, 49 and 54 after birth. After the third application of Mabs, all rats were inoculated with S. sobrinus (day 45). Subsequently, the rats were fed a cariogenic diet containing 20% sucrose and 5% glucose. The rats were killed 34 days after inoculation and the maxillary molars were extracted and homogenized in order to determine the numbers of S. sobrinus. The proportions of S. sobrinus, expressed as a percentage of the total cultivable microflora, in rats which received OMVU10 (group 1) were 23.1 ± 14.8%, whereas in rats which received Clone 24, culture medium or PBS the levels were 34.5 ± 11.3%, 40.7 ± 14.9% and 36.7 ± 9.7%, respectively. Statistical analysis showed that the level of colonization of rats which received OMVU10 was significantly lower than that of rats which received Clone 24, culture medium or PBS (p < 0.001, p < 0,013 and p < 0.01, respectively). No statistical differences were found between the three control groups. It was concluded that local application of specific Mabs against Antigen B of S. sobrinus reduced the colonization level of implanted S. sobrinus compared to the control groups.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.