The rehardening of surface-softened and surface-etched enamel was investigated in vitro and by intraoral exposure. Surface-softened enamel was obtained by treatment with 0.1 M acetic acid buffer solution (pH = 5.5) for 3 h. Surface-etched enamel was obtained by the acid etch procedure used in clinical situations (37% phosphoric acid gel, 30 s). The enamel lesions were treated in vitro, with calcifying solutions for 8 h or were carried for 48 h in an intraoral appliance. Changes at the enamel surfaces were investigated by surface micro-hardness measurements. Following the treatment with calcifying solutions a significantly greater indentation length was observed in surface-etched than in surface-softened enamel. No significant difference in indentation length between both types of enamel lesions was observed following intraoral exposure. It was concluded that the initial rate of rehardening between both types of enamel lesions is comparable. At his stage remineralization occurs in microspaces created in the slightly destroyed enamel structures. The influence of the etch pits on the indentation length becomes dominating when remineralization continues. An obliteration of etch pits was observed in enamel samples treated with the calcifying solution with the highest degree of saturation. It was suggested that freshly prepared highly supersaturated calcifying solutions can be used to enhance mineral appositions in accidental etch pits.

Keywords:
Acid etch technique, Calcium phosphate solution, Dentifrice, Enamel, Microhardness, Saliva
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1993 S. Karger AG, Basel
1993
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.