The aims of the investigation were to evaluate the effect of diÿerent fluoride programmes, as adjuncts to professional plaque control every 3–4 months, on root caries incidence in periodontally treated patients and to identify risk factors for root caries development. Ninety-nine individuals, 33–76 years old, who had been treated for periodontal disease were subjected to one of three fluoride programmes during a 2-year period: (1) professional application, 3-4 times/year, of Duraphat® (n = 34) or (2) of a 0.4% stannous fluoride gel (n = 33), or (3) daily mouthrinsing with a 0.05% sodium fluoride solution (n = 32). A number of clinical recordings and laboratory tests, used as presumptive risk indicators for root caries, were carried out before and on three different occasions after the periodontal treatment. No statistically significant differences were found between the various fluoride programmes. During the 2-year period, a total of 246 new decayed or filled surfaces (DFS) were recorded, 72 (29.3%) of which were diagnosed as active and 124 (50.4%) as inactive root caries lesions; 50 (20.3%) of the surfaces had been restored. Individuals with ≥ 1 new root DFS during the 2 years (n = 50) differed significantly from those with 0 new root DFS (n = 49) as concerns salivary counts of mutans streptococci and lactobacilli, root plaque scores and percentage of exposed root surfaces. Baseline root caries prevalence (r = 0.43) and root plaque scores (r = 0.36) showed the highest correlations with new root DFS. By stepwise multiple regression analysis, it was shown that these two variables contributed significantly to the variance of root caries incidence (new DFS) during the 2-year period. Smokers had a significantly higher root caries prevalence at baseline and higher root caries incidence during the study than non-smokers.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.