Three micromethods for the estimation of Streptococcus mutans and lactobacilli were compared. A micropipette method was selected because of its ability to detect low levels of the organisms and its high agreement with the conventional plating method and efficient use of agar medium. The trypticase yeast cystine sucrose bacitracin agar was found to be superior to the mitis salivarius bacitracin agar. Stimulated saliva of 144 Tanzanian children from the rural and urban areas in Morogoro was investigated for S. mutans and Lactobacillus counts. Both organisms were observed in all Tanzanian children. The mean S. mutans and Lactobacillus counts were 5.0 ± 0.9 and 4.5 ± 0.9 log cfu/ml saliva, respectively. S. mutans counts greater than 106 cfu/ml saliva were observed in 25% of the urban children and in 5% of the rural children. The caries prevalence was rather low and weakly correlated with the S. mutans and Lactobacillus counts. The Tanzanian children with a high S. mutans count but with a low caries experience were considered as caries-inactive at present, but at risk of developing dental caries by changing dietary habits.

Keywords:
Bacteriology, oral, Caries tests, Epidemiology, Lactobacilli, Streptococcus mutans, Salivary bacterial counts
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1985 S. Karger AG, Basel
1985
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.