Uncertainty exists about the interaction of monofluorophosphate (MFP) ion with apatitic substrates due to the complex interfacial chemistry. Not only is it necessary to consider a series of different ions in the aqueous phase; the solid may additionally show non-homogeneity. The situation is better described as a dynamic as opposed to a static equilibrium. The kinetics of the hydrolysis of MFP have been the subject of a series of studies. Our own experiments utilizing techniques analysing for both fluoride and MFP often showed significant differences in calculated and observed fluoride concentrations. Calcium ion at very low pH increases hydrolysis. This points to the inadequacy of etching procedures in obtaining enamel samples in connection with enamel MFP interactions. Postulated mechanisms of action in MFP apatite interaction include exchange with ortho-phosphate, a hydrolysis step leading to formation of orthophosphate and fluoride, and permanent replacement of HPO42- without a hydrolysis step. Our work does not support the idea of hydrolysis. We believe that observed increases in orthophosphate arise from other than hydrolytic cleavage of MFP ions and can be attributed to the direct interchange of MFP groups for orthophosphate groups on the surface of the apatitic substrate. Our recent observations suggest that MFP may adopt a cyclic trimolecular structure in acidic solutions similar to that of trimetaphosphate. The hydrolysis of this structure is suggested in explanation of the difficulties in resolving the rates of release of F- and orthophosphate from MFP.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.