Four groups of Wistar rats, 10–12 animals per group, were fed a diet containing: (1) sucrose, 56%; (2) highly hydrolysed starch hydrolysate (Lycasin®), 32%, and unmodified starch, 24%; (3) slightly hydrolysed Lycasin, 32%, and unmodified starch, 24%, and (4) unmodified starch, 56%. All animals were infected with a mixture of four strains of Streptococcus mutans and were kept on the diet by use of an automatic feeding machine for 60 days. The caries activity was higher in the sucrose group in fissures as well as on smoth surfaces than in all the three other groups (p < 0.001). With a few exceptions only enamel lesions and slight dentine lesions on the sulcal surfaces were found in the animals fed Lycasin or starch. There was a slight tendency (p < 0.05) to higher caries scores in the group fed the highly hydrolysed Lycasin, containing 38% free sorbitol, than in the group fed the starch hydrolysate with only 12% free sorbitol (slightly hydrolysed Lycasin). These differences in the cariogenicity between highly and slightly hydrolysed Lycasin are discussed concerning oral conditions in man.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.