Right bundle-branch block (RBBB) has not traditionally been seen as an obstacle to ECG diagnosis of Q wave myocardial infarction (MI) – in clinical electrocardiography and vectorcardiography – because this conduction disturbance is not believed to cause significant alterations in the spatial orientation of initial excitation wavefronts. In the era of large-scale clinical trials, however, where serial ECG analysis is among the major diagnostic tools in MI classification, both false-positive and false-negative diagnoses of MI in the presence of RBBB have become increasingly evident. Because of the limited detectability of Q wave MI by ECG in the presence of RBBB, the electrocardiographic finding of Q wave MI should not be regarded as an independent diagnostic tool. It is best to utilize independent corroboration to establish the diagnosis of transmural infarction when RBBB is present. Further investigations are warranted to better delineate sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of Q wave MI in the presence of RBBB.

1.
A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1991 Guidelines for Coronary Artery bypass Graft Surgery): ACC/AHA Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Executive Summary and Recommendations. Circulation 1999;100:1464–1480.
2.
Eppinger H, Rothberger J: Über die Folgen der Durchschneidung der Tawaraschen Schenkel des Reizleitungssystems. Z Klin Med 1910;70:1–20.
3.
Wilson FN, Macleod AG, Barker PS: The order of ventricular excitation in human bundle-branch block. Am Heart J 1931;7:305–330.
4.
Roberts GH, Crawford JH, Abramson DI, Cardwell JC: Experimental bundle-branch block in the cat. Am Heart J 1932;8:505–513.
5.
Roberts GH, Crawford JH, Abramson DI: Experimental bundle branch block in the monkey. J Clin Invest 1935;14:867–870.
6.
Amer NS, Stuckey JH, Hoffman BF, Cappelletti RR, Domingo RT: Activation of the intraventricular septal myocardium studied during cardiopulmonary bypass. Am Heart J 1960;59:224–237.
7.
Rosen KM, Rahimtoola SH, Sinno MZ, Gunnar RM: Bundle branch and ventricular activation in man: A study utilizing catheter recordings of left and right bundle-branch potentials. Circulation 1971;43:193–201.
8.
Katz LN, Hamburger WW, Rubinfeld SH: Partial bundle-branch block. Am Heart J 1932;8:753–758.
9.
Gussak I, Zhou SH, Rautaharju P, Bjerregaard P, Stocke K, Osada N, Yokoyama Y, Miller M, Islam S, Chaitman BR: Right bundle branch block as a cause of false-negative ECG classification of inferior myocardial infarction. J Electrocardiol 1999;32:279–284.
10.
Gambetta M, Childers RW: Rate-dependent right precordial Q wave: ‘Septal focal block’. Am J Cardiol 1973;32:196–201.
11.
Rosenbaum MB, Girotti LA, Lazzari JO, Halpern MS, Elisari MV: Abnormal Q waves in right-sided chest leads provoked by onset of right bundle branch block in patients with anteroseptal infarction. Br Heart J 1982;47:227–232.
12.
Gussak I, Bjerregaard P, Stocke K, Zhou SH, Homeyer CM, Chaitman BR: Minnesota code Q-wave misclassification caused by complete right bundle branch block in patients with CAD; in Oosterom A, Oostendorp TF, Uijen GJH (eds): Building Bridges in Electrocardiology. Nijmegen, Nijmegen University Press, 1995, p 230.
13.
Klein HO, David D: New Q waves do not always a new infarct spell: Right bundle branch block-dependent Q waves simulating infarct extension. Coron Artery Dis 1998;9:51–54.
14.
Schuilenburg RM, Durrer D: Rate-dependency of functional block in the human His bundle and bundle branch Purkinje system. Circulation 1973;48:526–540.
15.
Wu D, Denes P, Dhingra R, Rosen KM: Bundle branch block: Demonstration of the incomplete nature of some ‘complete’ bundle branch and fascicular blocks by the extrastimulus technique. Am J Cardiol 1974;33:583–589.
16.
Wu D, Denes P, Dhingra RC, Amat-Y-Leon F, Wyndham CR, Chuquimia R, Rosen KM: Electrophysiological and clinical observations in patients with alternating bundle branch block. Circulation 1976;53:456–464.
17.
Jazayeri MR, Deshpande SS, Sra JS, Akhtar M: Retrograde (transseptal) activation of right bundle branch during sinus rhythm. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1993;4:280–287.
18.
Lemery R, Kleinebenne A, Nihoyannopoulos P, Aber V, Alfonso F, McKenna WJ: Q waves in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in relation to the distribution and severity of right and left ventricular hypertrophy. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990;16:368–374.
19.
Tamura A, Kataoka H, Mikuriya Y: Influence of right ventricular ischemia on septal Q waves determined by coronary angioplasty. Am Heart J 1992;123:1198–1201.
20.
Mehdirad AA, Curtiss E, Tchou P: Interrelations between QRS morphology, duration, and HV interval changes following right bundle branch radiofrequency catheter ablation. PACE 1998;21:1180–1188.
21.
Dancy M, Leech G, Leatham A: Significance of complete right bundle-branch block when an isolated finding: An echocardiographic study. Br Heart J 1982;48:217–221.
22.
McAnulty JH, Rahimtoola SH: Bundle branch block. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1984;26:333–335.
23.
Horowitz LN, Vetter VL: Right bundle branch block updated. Int J Cardiol 1984;5:113–118.
24.
Sodi-Pollares, Rodriges MI, Chait LO, Zuckermann R: The activation of the interventricular septum. Am Heart J 1951;41:569–608.
25.
Scher AM, Young AC, Malmgren Al, Erikson RV: Activation of the interventricular septum. Circ Res 1955;3:56–64.
26.
Grant RP, Dodge HT: Mechanisms of QRS complex prolongation in man: Right ventricular conduction defects. Am J Med 1956;20:834–852.
27.
Athanassopoulos CB: Transient focal septal block. Chest 1979;75:728–730.
28.
Loperfido F, Fanelli R, Ansalone G, De Matteis D: Transient right bundle branch block unmasking anteroseptal infarction concealed by left posterior fascicular block. Acta Cardiol 1980;35:235–243.
29.
Okoroma EO, Guller B, Maloney JD, Weidman WH: Etiology of right bundle-branch block pattern after surgical closure of ventricular-septal defects. Am Heart J 1975;90:14–18.
30.
Medrano GA, De Micheli A, Alatriste VM, Sodi-Pallares D: Septal necrosis complicated by bifascicular and trifascicular block. Arch Inst Cardiol Mex 1973;43:714–732.
31.
Nakaya Y, Hiasa Y, Murayama Y, Ueda S, Nagao T, Niki T, Mori H, Takashima Y: Prominent anterior QRS force as a manifestation of left septal fascicular block. J Electrocardiol 1978;11:39–46.
32.
Mirvis DM: Electrocardiography: A Physiological Approach. St. Louis, Mosby, 1994, vol 1.
33.
De Padua FI, Pereirnha A, Lopes MG: Conduction defects; in MacFarlene PW, Veitch Lawrie TD (eds): Comprehensive Electrocardiography: Theory and Practice in Health and Disease. New York, Pergamon Press, 1989, p 459.
34.
Dabrowska B, Ruka M, Walczak E: The electrocardiographic diagnosis of left septal fascicular block. Eur J Cardiol 1978;6:347–357.
35.
Arnsdorf MF: Left Median Fascicle Block. UpToDate Publishing, 1999, vol 7.
36.
Demoulin JC, Kulbertus HE: Histopathological examination of concept of left hemiblock. Br Heart J 1972;34:807–814.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.