To evaluate the efficacy of an early 201Tl reinjection and imaging protocol for reducing the need for conventional 4-hour or optimal 24-hour redistribution imaging (RI) and detecting of myocardial viability, we compared the results of early postexercise Tl reinjection and imaging with those of 4- and 24-hour RI in 74 consecutive patients aged 55 ± 9 years (mean ± SD) who were assessed for myocardial ischemia. One millicurie of Tl was injected promptly after completion of the initial postexercise imaging (PEX) and three additional sets of images were acquired 1, 4 and 18–24 h later. A total of 2,368 segments were evaluated. On PEX, 390 (17%) segments showed defects, of which 287 (74%) showed enhanced Tl uptake at 1-hour RI; 89 (23%) did not change and 14 (4%) showed reverse redistribution. Of the 103 persistent defects, only 27 (7%) showed further fill-in of Tl; 62 (16%) segments showed reverse redistribution at 4-hour RI while at 18- to 24-hour RI 17 (4%) and 47 (12%) segments showed further fill-in of Tl and reverse redistribution, respectively. Finally, after analysis of 4- and 18- to 24-hour RI, the diagnosis changed from myocardial necrosis to ischemia in only 2 (3%) patients. In conclusion, these results suggest that by eliminating the need for an additional delayed set of images for detection of myocardial viability, this protocol reduces the total investigation procedure, is more convenient for the patient, increases patient turnover and expedites the decision-making process.

Keywords:
Myocardial ischemia, Thallium-201, Reinjection
This content is only available via PDF.
1998
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.