To compare the effects of laser light with those of radiofrequency (RF) current on ventricular myocardium, a total of 36 lesions (endocardial approach n = 10 each and epicardial approach n = 8 each) were produced by either transcatheter laser (Nd:YAG, 1,064 nm, 30 W, 30 s) or RF (70 °C, 30 s) catheter applications in the beating hearts of 4 dogs. Volumes of coagulated myocardium in endo-/epicardial approaches were 996 ± 73/1,075 ± 82 (laser) and 111 ± 38/44 ± 5 mm3 (RF). RF lesions showed intramural bleeding, rupture and dissociation of myocardial fibers, tissue vaporization with crater and thrombus formation. Transcatheter application of laser light produced significantly larger and better reproducible lesions than RF current, without undesirable effects on the ventricular walls.

Keywords:
Laser, Radiofrequency, Catheter ablation, Ventricular tachycardia
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1997 S. Karger AG, Basel
1997
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.