The prognostic information from 24-hour monitoring with on-line vectorcardiography (VCG) was assessed in 100 patients with a clinical diagnosis of unstable angina pectoris. ST change vector magnitude, ST vector magnitude and QRS vector difference were monitored. During a follow-up period of 343 ± 77 days, 7 patients died from cardiac causes and 8 patients had a nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI). Thirty patients were readmitted for unstable angina pectoris and 36 were revascularized because of medical refractory angina. Univariate predictors of cardiac death or nonfatal MI included greater age, rest pain during hospitalization, previous MI, diabetes mellitus and high incidence of supposedly ischemic transient ST and QRS vector changes. In multivariate analysis, a high incidence of transient ST (p < 0.01) and QRS (p < 0.01) vector changes provided additional prognostic information beyond that of clinical and exercise test data. In conclusion, VCG monitoring during the first 24 h of hospitalization for unstable angina pectoris identifies patients with increased risk of adverse cardiac events.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.