Objective: Left atrial (LA) mechanical function is thought to be virtually inexistent in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation (AF). Due to recent advances in multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) technology, it is now possible to acquire images of the entire heart in a single heartbeat. The objective of this study was to compare individual components of LA function assessed by MDCT in patients with permanent AF and patients in sinus rhythm (SR). Methods: 320-slice MDCT was performed in 30 patients with permanent AF. Measurements of LA volumes during the cardiac cycle were compared to 30 patients in SR, who were matched with respect to age, sex, left ventricular ejection fraction and body surface area. Results: LA volumes were significantly larger in patients with AF than SR patients at all times during the cardiac cycle (LA maximal volume; 82 vs. 55 ml/m2, p < 0.0001, LA minimal volume; 71 vs. 30 ml/m2, p < 0.0001). However, except for the absence of active LA emptying, the overall trend of the LA time-volume curve was similar in patients with AF and SR. Conclusion: Compared to SR patients, patients with permanent AF have significantly increased LA volumes throughout the cardiac cycle. Yet, a residual hemodynamic role of LA function may be maintained during permanent AF.

1.
Kannel WB, Wolf PA, Benjamin EJ, Levy D: Prevalence, incidence, prognosis, and predisposing conditions for atrial fibrillation: population-based estimates. Am J Cardiol 1998;82:2N-9N.
2.
Feinberg WM, Blackshear JL, Laupacis A, Kronmal R, Hart RG: Prevalence, age distribution, and gender of patients with atrial fibrillation: analysis and implications. Arch Intern Med 1995;155:469-473.
3.
Benjamin EJ, Wolf PA, D'Agostino RB, Silbershatz H, Kannel WB, Levy D: Impact of atrial fibrillation on the risk of death: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 1998;98:946-952.
4.
Naccarelli GV, Varker H, Lin J, Schulman KL: Increasing prevalence of atrial fibrillation and flutter in the United States. Am J Cardiol 2009;104:1534-1539.
5.
Friberg J, Buch P, Scharling H, Gadsbøll N, Jensen GB: Rising rates of hospital admissions for atrial fibrillation. Epidemiology 2003;14:666-672.
6.
Therkelsen SK, Groenning BA, Svendsen JH, Jensen GB: Atrial and ventricular volume and function in persistent and permanent atrial fibrillation, a magnetic resonance imaging study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2005;7:465-473.
7.
Benjamin EJ, D'Agostino RB, Belanger AJ, Wolf PA, Levy D: Left atrial size and the risk of stroke and death: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 1995;92:835-841.
8.
Tsang TS, Gersh BJ, Appleton CP, Tajik AJ, Barnes ME, Bailey KR, Oh JK, Leibson C, Montgomery SC, Seward JB: Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction as a predictor of the first diagnosed nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in 840 elderly men and women. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:1636-1644.
9.
Vaziri SM, Larson MG, Benjamin EJ, Levy D: Echocardiographic predictors of nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation. The Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 1994;89:724-730.
10.
Abhayaratna WP, Seward JB, Appleton CP, Douglas PS, Oh JK, Tajik AJ, Tsang TSM: Left atrial size: physiologic determinants and clinical applications. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:2357-2363.
11.
Wen Z, Zhang Z, Yu W, Fan Z, Du J, Lv B: Assessing the left atrial phasic volume and function with dual-source CT: comparison with 3T MRI. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2010;26:83-92.
12.
Sugeng L: Quantitative assessment of left ventricular size and function: side-by-side comparison of real-time three-dimensional echocardiography and computed tomography with magnetic resonance reference. Circulation 2006;114:654-661.
13.
Christiaens L, Varroud-Vial N, Ardilouze P, Ragot S, Mergy J, Bonnet B, Herpin D, Allal J: Real three-dimensional assessment of left atrial and left atrial appendage volumes by 64-slice spiral computed tomography in individuals with or without cardiovascular disease. Int J Cardiol 2010;140:189-196.
14.
Kataoka A, Funabashi N, Takahashi A, Yajima R, Takahashi M, Uehara M, Takaoka H, Saito M, Yamaguchi C, Lee K, Nomura F, Komuro I: Quantitative evaluation of left atrial volumes and ejection fraction by 320-slice computed-tomography in comparison with three- and two-dimensional echocardiography: a single-center retrospective-study in 22 subjects. Int J Cardiol 2011;153:47-54.
15.
Gaudio C, Evangelista A, Pasceri V, Pannarale G, Varrica S, Romitelli S, Pelliccia F, Pellegrini M: Visualization of coronary arteries and coronary stents by low dose 320-slice multi-detector computed tomography in a patient with atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiol 2011;151:e6-e7.
16.
Järvinen V, Kupari M, Hekali P, Poutanen V-P: Assessment of left atrial volumes and phasic function using cine magnetic resonance imaging in normal subjects. Am J Cardiol 1994;73:1135-1138.
17.
Patel AR, Fatemi O, Norton PT, West JJ, Helms AS, Kramer CM, Ferguson JD: Cardiac cycle-dependent left atrial dynamics: implications for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm 2008;5:787-793.
18.
Agner BFR, Kühl JT, Linde JJ, Kofoed KF, Åkeson P, Rasmussen BV, Jensen GB, Dixen U: Assessment of left atrial volume and function in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation: comparison of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, 320-slice multi-detector computed tomography, and transthoracic echocardiography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2014;15:532-540.
19.
Fuchs A, Kühl JT, Lønborg J, Engstrøm T, Vejlstrup N, Køber L, Kofoed KF: Automated assessment of heart chamber volumes and function in patients with previous myocardial infarction using multidetector computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2012;6:325-334.
20.
Kühl JT, Kofoed KF, Møller JE, Hammer-Hansen S, Kristensen T, Køber L, Kelbæk H: Assessment of left atrial volume and mechanical function in ischemic heart disease: a multi slice computed tomography study. Int J Cardiol 2010;145:197-202.
21.
Kühl JT, Lønborg J, Fuchs A, Andersen MJ, Vejlstrup N, Kelbæk H, Engstrøm T, Møller JE, Kofoed KF: Assessment of left atrial volume and function: a comparative study between echocardiography, magnetic resonance imaging and multi slice computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;28:1061-1071.
22.
Maceira AM, Cosín-Sales J, Roughton M, Prasad SK, Pennell DJ: Reference left atrial dimensions and volumes by steady state free precession cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2010;12:65.
23.
Osranek M, Bursi F, Bailey KR, Grossardt BR, Brown RD, Kopecky SL, Tsang TS, Seward JB: Left atrial volume predicts cardiovascular events in patients originally diagnosed with lone atrial fibrillation: three-decade follow-up. Eur Heart J 2005;26:2556-2561.
24.
Simek CL, Feldman MD, Haber HL, Wu CC, Jayaweera AR, Kaul S: Relationship between left ventricular wall thickness and left atrial size: comparison with other measures of diastolic function. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1995;8:37-47.
25.
Tsang TSM, Barnes ME, Gersh BJ, Bailey KR, Seward JB: Left atrial volume as a morphophysiologic expression of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and relation to cardiovascular risk burden. Am J Cardiol 2002;90:1284-1289.
26.
Lester SJ, Ryan EW, Schiller NB, Foster E: Best method in clinical practice and in research studies to determine left atrial size. Am J Cardiol 1999;84:829-832.
27.
Møller JE: Left atrial volume: a powerful predictor of survival after acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 2003;107:2207-2212.
28.
Tsang TSM, Abhayaratna WP, Barnes ME, Miyasaka Y, Gersh BJ, Bailey KR, Cha SS, Seward JB: Prediction of cardiovascular outcomes with left atrial size: is volume superior to area or diameter? J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:1018-1023.
29.
Mayo JR, Leipsic JA: Radiation dose in cardiac CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;192:646-653.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.