Background/Aims: Cardiac arrhythmias are triggered by environmental stimuli that may modulate expression of cardiac ion channels. Underlying epigenetic regulation of cardiac electrophysiology remains incompletely understood. Histone deacetylases (HDACs) control gene expression and cardiac integrity. We hypothesized that class I/II HDACs transcriptionally regulate ion channel expression and determine action potential duration (APD) in cardiac myocytes. Methods: Global class I/II HDAC inhibition was achieved by administration of trichostatin A (TSA). HDAC-mediated effects on K+ channel expression and electrophysiological function were evaluated in murine atrial cardiomyocytes (HL-1 cells) using real-time PCR, Western blot, and patch clamp analyses. Electrical tachypacing was employed to recapitulate arrhythmia-related effects on ion channel remodeling in the absence and presence of HDAC inhibition. Results: Global HDAC inhibition increased histone acetylation and prolonged APD90 in atrial cardiomyocytes compared to untreated control cells. Transcript levels of voltage-gated or inwardly rectifying K+ channels Kcnq1, Kcnj3 and Kcnj5 were significantly reduced, whereas Kcnk2, Kcnj2 and Kcnd3 mRNAs were upregulated. Ion channel remodeling was similarly observed at protein level. Short-term tachypacing did not induce significant transcriptional K+ channel remodeling. Conclusion: The present findings link class I/II HDAC activity to regulation of ion channel expression and action potential duration in atrial cardiomyocytes. Clinical implications for HDAC-based antiarrhythmic therapy and cardiac safety of HDAC inhibitors require further investigation.

Electrophysiological properties of cardiomyocytes are governed by ion channels, pumps and exchangers. Ion channel dysfunction represents a key factor in the pathophysiology of heart rhythm disorders [1-5]. Specifically, alterations of ion channel expression contribute to the initiation and maintenance of cardiac arrhythmias [6, 7]. Current pharmacological antiarrhythmic therapy is limited by reduced effectiveness and side effects in a significant subgroup of patients [8-10]. Targeted therapeutic approaches based on underlying molecular mechanisms may improve future antiarrhythmic management. However, specific mechanisms contributing to defective regulation of ion channel expression during cardiac arrhythmia are poorly understood.

We hypothesized that regulation of gene expression programs through epigenetic modulation may affect cardiac electrophysiology and promote arrhythmogenesis. DNA within the nucleus of eukaryotic cells is packaged together with histones and non-histone proteins in a dynamic manner as chromatin [11]. Histones are subject to modification, including acetylation and deacetylation mediated by histone acetyltransferases (HATs) and histone deacetylases (HDACs), respectively [12]. Deacetylation of histone lysine residues results in chromatin condensation and modification of gene transcription. In addition, HDACs interact with non-histone proteins such as transcription factors, co-activators and co-repressors [13]. Recent reports revealed that HDACs are involved in cardiac hypertrophy [14-16], fibrosis [17-19] and metabolism [20]. Furthermore, QT-interval prolongation and ventricular arrhythmias have been observed during small molecule HDAC inhibition for anticancer therapy in humans, suggesting cardiac electrophysiological effects of HDAC inhibition [21-24].

The mechanisms underlying electrophysiological actions of HDAC modulation are not known. This study was designed to investigate transcriptional and functional effects of HDAC inhibition on repolarizing cardiac K+ channels. To this end, the hydroxamic acid trichostatin A (TSA), an established and highly specific small molecule HDAC inhibitor with antitumor activity [25-28], was employed. At the molecular level, TSA serves as pan-HDAC inhibitor of class I (HDACs 1, 2, 3, and 8) and II HDACs (HDACs 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, and 10) at nanomolar concentrations by reversibly binding to the catalytic site of the enzyme [29]. TSA is a zinc-dependent HDAC inhibitor that harbors three distinct domains (Fig. 1 A) [30]. First, the surface recognition site is formed by an aromatic group and interacts with the binding pocket of HDAC molecules. Second, a zinc binding domain coordinates to the active site of Zn2+ ion. Third, the linker region connects the surface recognition site to the zinc binding domain. Specifically, structural studies using TSA bound to HDAC revealed that the surface-recognition element interacts with the entrance rim of the active site, whereas the zinc binding domain forms complexes with the metal ion at the bottom of the site pocket located inside the HDAC molecule [31-33].

Fig. 1.

Increased histone acetylation after pan-HDAC inhibition by trichostatin A (TSA). A. Chemical structure (C17H22N2O3) of TSA. Functional domains of the compound are indicated. B. Protein levels of acetylated histone H3 (Ac-H3) were analyzed by Western blot in HL-1 cells incubated with 100 nM TSA for 12 hours, followed by quantification of optical density normalized to glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). Immunoblots (upper panel) and mean values (±SEM) obtained following TSA application (n=3) or control treatment (n=3) (lower panel) are shown; *p< 0.05.

Fig. 1.

Increased histone acetylation after pan-HDAC inhibition by trichostatin A (TSA). A. Chemical structure (C17H22N2O3) of TSA. Functional domains of the compound are indicated. B. Protein levels of acetylated histone H3 (Ac-H3) were analyzed by Western blot in HL-1 cells incubated with 100 nM TSA for 12 hours, followed by quantification of optical density normalized to glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). Immunoblots (upper panel) and mean values (±SEM) obtained following TSA application (n=3) or control treatment (n=3) (lower panel) are shown; *p< 0.05.

Close modal

The results of this work revealed epigenetic, HDAC-mediated regulation of action potential duration and K+ channel expression in atrial cardiomyocytes.

HL-1 cell culture

HL-1 cells (kindly provided by Dr. William Claycomb, Louisiana State University Health Science Center, New Orleans, LA, USA) were derived from atrial tumor (AT-1) cells of transgenic mice expressing the SV40 large T antigen under the control of the atrial natriuretic factor (ANF) promoter and exhibit cardiomyocyte-specific ion channel expression [34, 35]. Cells were cultured in supplemented Claycomb medium (JRH Biosciences, Lenexa, KS, USA) as previously described [36, 37].

Drug administration

Trichostatin A (Sigma-Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) was prepared as 5 mM stock solution in DMSO. Aliquots of the stock solutions were diluted freshly to the desired concentrations with culture media on the day of experiments. TSA treatment of HL-1 cell cultures was performed in supplemented Claycomb medium (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 12 h when cells were 60-80% confluent, unless indicated otherwise.

Action potential recordings

Cardiac action potentials were recorded from HL-1 cells 12 h after application of 100 nM TSA using the whole-cell patch-clamp technique. Fire-polished capillary glass pipettes (World Precision Instruments, New Haven, CT, USA) were back-filled with 140 mM KCl, 1.0 mM MgCl2, 10 mM 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES), 5 mM ethyleneglycol tetraacetic acid (EGTA), 5 mM adenosine triphosphate potassium salt (KATP), 0.1 mM guanosine triphosphate sodium salt (NaGTP) and 3 mM phosphocreatine sodium salt (Na2CP) (pH adjusted to 7.2 with KOH). The extracellular solution was Tyrode’s solution (140 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 1 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, 10 mM glucose and 10 mM HEPES, pH adjusted 7.4 with NaOH). Pipettes had resistances between 1.5 and 5 MΩ. Data were low-pass filtered at 1 to 2 kHz (–3 dB, four-pole Bessel filter) before digitalization at 5 to 10 kHz. Recordings were performed using a commercially available amplifier (Warner OC-725A, Harvard Apparatus, Holliston, MA, USA) and pCLAMP software (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) for data acquisition and analysis. Action potentials were elicited in current clamp mode by injection of brief current pulses (2 ms, 1 nA) at a stimulation frequency of 1 Hz and recorded at near physiological temperatures of 30 - 32°C.

RNA isolation and RT-qPCR

Total RNA was isolated from HL-1 cells with TRIzol-Reagent (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany), followed by chloroform extraction and isopropanol precipitation. RNA was quantified by assessing optical density at 260 and 280 nm (NanoDrop 2000, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA). Complementary DNA synthesis was carried out with the Maxima First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit for RT-qPCR (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) using 2-3 µg (10 μl) of total RNA, 4 μl of 5-fold reaction mixture, and 2 μl Maxima enzyme mix in 20 μl final volume. Quantitative real time PCR (RT-qPCR) was performed using the 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. 96 well optical detection plates (Applied Biosystems) were loaded to a total volume of 10 μl per well, consisting of 0.5 μl cDNA, 5 μl TaqMan Fast Universal Master Mix (Applied Biosystems), and 6-carboxyfluorescein (FAM)-labeled TaqMan probes and primers (TaqMan Gene Expression Assays; Applied Biosystems) detecting Kcnq1 (Mm00434640_m1), Kcnk2 (Mm01323942_m1), Kcnk3 (Mm04213388_s1), Kcnj2 (Mm00434616_m1), Kcnj3 (Mm00434618_m1), Kcnj5 (Mm01175829_m1), Kcnj12 (Mm00440058_s1), Kcnj4 (Mm02027786_s1), Kcnd3 (Mm01302126_m1), Kcne1(Mm01215533_m1), Kcna4 (Mm00445241_s1), Kcna5 (Mm00524346_s1), and Kcnh2 (Mm00465377_mH). Primers and probes detecting glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) were used for normalization. All RT-qPCR reactions were performed in triplicate or higher replicates, and non-template control (NTC) and dilution series were included on each plate for quantification. Data are expressed as an average of triplicates. Data analyses were performed with the Applied System using the second derivative method. All measurements were adjusted using a standard probe, and quantification was corrected for efficiency calculated with the standard curves.

Protein extraction and Western blot analysis

Protein immunodetection was performed by sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) gel electrophoresis and Western blotting [38, 39]. HL-1 cells were lysed in radioimmunoprecipitation (RIPA) buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl, 0.5% NP-40, 0.5% sodium-deoxycholate, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM Na3VO4, 1 mM NaF, and inhibitors of proteases (Complete) and phosphatases (PhosStop) (Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN, USA). Homogenates were centrifuged at 4°C for 30 min at 14000 g. Supernatants were collected, and the protein concentration was determined using the bicinchoninic acid (BCA) protein assay (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA). Equal amounts of protein were separated on 6–20% SDS polyacrylamide gels, transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes, and developed using primary antibodies directed against acetyl-histone H3 (Ac-H3) (sc-8655; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Heidelberg, Germany), KCND3 (sc-11686; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), KCNJ2 (sc-18708; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), KCNJ3 (APC-005; Alomone Labs; Jerusalem, Israel), KCNJ5 (sc-23635; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), KCNK2 (sc-11556; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), KCNQ1 (sc-10646; Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-rabbit (ab6721; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), mouse anti-goat (sc-2354; Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and goat anti-mouse (sc-2005; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) secondary antibodies were used where appropriate. Signals were developed using the enhanced chemiluminescence assay (ECL Western Blotting Reagents, GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK) and quantified with ImageJ 1.41 Software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). After removal of primary and secondary antibodies (ReBlot Strong Stripping Solution, Merck, Germany), the membranes were re-probed with anti-GAPDH antibodies (G8140-11; US Biological, Swampscott, MA, USA) and corresponding secondary antibodies (sc-2005; Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Protein content was normalized to GAPDH for quantification of optical density.

Rapid electrical stimulation of HL-1 cells

Gelatin-/fibronectin-coated 6-well dishes were seeded with 2x106 HL-1 cells. After 24h incubation the cells were ≥90% confluent and subjected to electrical stimulation using the C-Pace EP system (IonOptix, Milton, MA, USA), a multi-channel stimulator designed for chronic stimulation of bulk quantities of cultured cells in incubators, providing continual uniform electric field stimulation of cardiac myocytes. The cells were stimulated with 10 V / 10 ms pulses at 5 Hz stimulation rate. Following rapid electrical stimulation for 12 h, cell-viability was visually assessed by microscopic examination, before cells were harvested and subjected to RNA isolation.

Statistics

Data are expressed as mean ±SEM of n experiments. Multiple comparisons were performed using one-way ANOVA, as no interaction between independent nominal variables (i.e., TSA concentrations) could be expected. If the hypothesis of equal means could be rejected at the 0.05-level, pairwise comparisons of groups were made and the probability values were adjusted for multiple comparisons using the Holm-Sidak correction. Statistical analyses were performed with GraphPad Prism 6.0 software (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA). Statistical differences of continuous variables were determined using unpaired Student’s t tests (two-sided tests). Mann-Whitney U tests were applied if F tests of two samples indicated unequal variance. P< 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

HDAC inhibition causes action potential prolongation in HL-1 cardiomyocytes

HL-1 cells were employed to elucidate transcriptional and functional actions of HDAC-inhibition. The cells exhibit multiple features of adult atrial cardiomyocytes including typical ionic currents [34, 40]. First, TSA (Fig. 1 A) was applied to assess the effects of broad spectrum class I/ II HDAC inhibition on action potential duration (APD). Inhibition of histone deacetylation by application of 100 nM TSA for 12 h significantly increased the level of acetyl-histone H3 by 11.5-fold (n=3, p=0.04) compared with untreated controls (n=3), indicating effective target modulation by the intervention (Fig. 1 B). TSA treatment prolonged APD at 90% repolarization (APD90) by 2.9-fold to 53±8 ms (n=9, p=0.005) compared to untreated HL-1 cells (18±5 ms; n=5) (Fig. 2 A and B). APD at 50% repolarization (APD50) was not significantly affected by TSA (control, 10±5 ms, n=5; TSA, 19±5 ms, n=9; p=0.25).

Fig. 2.

Action potential prolongation induced by HDAC inhibition. A. Representative action potentials recorded from HL-1 cells under untreated control conditions and after administration of 100 nM trichostatin A (TSA) for 12 h. B. Corresponding mean (±SEM) action potential durations at 50% (APD50) and 90% (APD90) repolarization for controls (n=5) and following HDAC inhibition (n=9). **p< 0.01 versus control conditions.

Fig. 2.

Action potential prolongation induced by HDAC inhibition. A. Representative action potentials recorded from HL-1 cells under untreated control conditions and after administration of 100 nM trichostatin A (TSA) for 12 h. B. Corresponding mean (±SEM) action potential durations at 50% (APD50) and 90% (APD90) repolarization for controls (n=5) and following HDAC inhibition (n=9). **p< 0.01 versus control conditions.

Close modal

TSA induces transcriptional remodeling of potassium channel expression

Prolongation of the action potential duration may be caused by reduced expression of repolarizing K+ channels. To explore the molecular basis of AP modulation induced by HDAC inhibition, mRNA levels of 13 potassium channel subunits relevant to cardiac electrophysiology were analyzed by real-time qPCR in HL-1 cells (Fig. 3A – 3C). TSA application (100 nM, 12 h) was associated with significant transcriptional changes affecting multiple K+ channels (Fig. 3 B and C; n=3 independent assays) compared with untreated control cells (Fig. 3 A). HDAC inhibition was characterized by reduced mRNA expression of the IK,Ach channel subunits Kcnj3 (Kir3.1; -36%, p=0.049) and Kcnj5 (-93%, p=0.0006) involved in repolarization of atrial cardiomyocytes, as well as the pore-forming slowly-activating delayed-rectifier K+ current (IKs) channel subunit Kcnq1 (Kv7.1; -35%, p=0.013), a major contributor to atrial and ventricular action potential repolarization. These changes are consistent with delayed repolarization and prolonged APD of cardiomyocytes. By contrast, significantly increased mRNA levels were observed for Kcnk2 (K2P2.1, TREK-1; +330%, p=0.002), Kcnj2 (Kir2.1; +470%, p=0.0003), and Kcnd3 (Kv4.3; +286%, p=0.01) channels.

Fig. 3.

HDAC-related remodeling of K+ channel mRNA. Transcription of cardiac ion channel DNA was assessed in HL-1 cells under baseline conditions (Untreated; n=3; A) and after HDAC inhibition using 100 nM trichostatin A (TSA; n=3) (B). C. TSA-induced changes in mRNA expression levels were normalized to glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). Data are expressed as mean±SEM; *p< 0.05; **p< 0.01; ***p< 0.001.

Fig. 3.

HDAC-related remodeling of K+ channel mRNA. Transcription of cardiac ion channel DNA was assessed in HL-1 cells under baseline conditions (Untreated; n=3; A) and after HDAC inhibition using 100 nM trichostatin A (TSA; n=3) (B). C. TSA-induced changes in mRNA expression levels were normalized to glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). Data are expressed as mean±SEM; *p< 0.05; **p< 0.01; ***p< 0.001.

Close modal

HDAC inhibitors such as TSA induce biological effects at nanomolar concentrations in a dose-dependent manner. To further characterize pharmacological regulation of K+ channel transcription by HDAC inhibition, concentration-dependent effects of TSA were assessed. Messenger RNA expression of channels exhibiting significant modulation by 100 nM TSA (Fig. 3) was quantified in one (Kcnk2, Kcnj2, Kcnj3, Kcnj5) or two (Kcnq1, Kcnd3) independent assays after application of increasing concentrations of TSA (25 nM, 50 nM, 100 nM, 150 nM, and 300 nM) for 12 h relative to control conditions in the absence of TSA (Fig. 4A–4F). Kcnj3 (25 nM: -75%, p< 0.001; 300nM: -92%, p< 0.001) and Kcnj5 transcript levels (25 nM: -74%, p< 0.001; 300 nM: -93%, p< 0.001) underlying atrial IK,Ach exhibited concentration-dependent downregulation (Fig. 4 D and E). In addition, we observed reduced Kcnq1 mRNA expression (25 nM: -56%, p< 0.001; 300 nM: -71%, p< 0.001) (Fig. 4 A). Corresponding to our screening data presented above, TSA induced concentration-dependent enhancement of Kcnk2 (5.2-fold increase at 300 nM; p< 0.0001) and Kcnd3 (2.9-fold increase at 300 nM; p=0.003) transcript levels (Fig. 4 B and F). Furthermore, Kcnj2 mRNA levels normalized to GAPDH were increased by 4.6-fold (300 nM TSA, p=0.0006) (Fig. 4C).

Fig. 4.

Concentration-dependent effects of trichostatin A (TSA) on K+ channel mRNA transcription. A.-F. Changes in mRNA expression of indicated channels were determined after administration of increasing concentrations of TSA relative to untreated controls. Data are given as mean (±SEM) normalized to glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). Levels of significance (*p< 0.05; **p< 0.01; ***p< 0.001) include adjustments for multiple comparisons using ANOVA followed by Holm-Sidak post hoc testing.

Fig. 4.

Concentration-dependent effects of trichostatin A (TSA) on K+ channel mRNA transcription. A.-F. Changes in mRNA expression of indicated channels were determined after administration of increasing concentrations of TSA relative to untreated controls. Data are given as mean (±SEM) normalized to glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). Levels of significance (*p< 0.05; **p< 0.01; ***p< 0.001) include adjustments for multiple comparisons using ANOVA followed by Holm-Sidak post hoc testing.

Close modal

HDAC-related transcriptional remodeling alters cardiac K+ channel protein levels

Translational effects of transcriptionally regulated K+ channels were assessed by Western blot analysis in HL-1 cells incubated with 100 nM TSA for 12 h (Fig. 5A – 5F). Suppressed mRNA expression of IK,Ach channel subunits resulted in KCNJ3 and KCNJ5 protein reduction by 49% (p=0.012; n=6) and 31% (p=0.041; n=6), respectively (Fig. 5 D and E). Similarly, reduced protein expression was observed for KCNQ1 after HDAC inhibition (-43%; p=0.004; n=6) (Fig. 5 A). In addition, enhanced mRNA transcription after HDAC inhibition resulted in upregulated KCNK2 (+93%; p=0.009; n=6) and KCNJ2 protein levels (+87%; p=0.037; n=6), respectively (Fig. 5 B and C). Finally, KCND3 protein levels were not significantly altered by TSA application (n=6), indicating low relevance of HDAC-dependent modulation of pore-forming Kv4.3 subunits under the given experimental conditions (Fig. 5 F).

Fig. 5.

Effects of HDAC inhibition on K+ channel protein expression. Representative immunoblots (upper panels) and mean optical density values normalized to glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) obtained from six independent experiments (lower panels) are shown in the absence (Control) and presence of 100 nM trichostatin A (TSA) for subunits exhibiting significant transcriptional regulation (see Fig. 3): KCNQ1 (A), KCNK2 (B), KCNJ2 (C), KCNJ3 (D), KCNJ5 (E), and KCND3 (F). *p< 0.05; **p< 0.01 for indicated pairwise comparisons.

Fig. 5.

Effects of HDAC inhibition on K+ channel protein expression. Representative immunoblots (upper panels) and mean optical density values normalized to glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) obtained from six independent experiments (lower panels) are shown in the absence (Control) and presence of 100 nM trichostatin A (TSA) for subunits exhibiting significant transcriptional regulation (see Fig. 3): KCNQ1 (A), KCNK2 (B), KCNJ2 (C), KCNJ3 (D), KCNJ5 (E), and KCND3 (F). *p< 0.05; **p< 0.01 for indicated pairwise comparisons.

Close modal

Tachypacing-associated upregulation of KCNJ5 potassium channels is reversed by broad-spectrum HDAC inhibition

Rapid electrical pacing of cultured cells in vitro or tissue in vivo is an established model of cardiac tachyarrhythmia that may induce electrophysiological remodeling similar to human findings [1, 3, 5, 35, 41, 42]. In particular, tachypacing of HL-1 cells has been shown to cause action potential shortening [35]. To test the hypotheses that rapid pacing induces AP shortening by K+ channel upregulation, and that reduced APD may be reversed by HDAC inhibition and associated K+ current suppression, experiments with HL-1 subjected to tachypacing (TP) were performed (Fig. 6A – 6F). Resulting mRNA levels were compared to non-paced control cells. Rapid electrical pacing for 12 h did not induce significant transcriptional regulation of Kcnj3 or Kcnj5 IK,Ach subunits, inward-rectifier potassium channel subunits Kcnj2, or Kcnq1, Kcnk2, and Kcnd3 mRNA abundance, respectively (Fig. 6A – 6F; n=3 each). By contrast, HDAC inhibition (100 nM) during electrical tachypacing reduced mRNA levels of IK,Ach channels (Kcnj3: -33%, p< 0.001, n=6; Kcnj5: -81%, p=0.003, n=3) (Fig. 6 D and E). Apparent increases of Kcnk2 and Kcnd3 mRNA abundance, and reduction of Kcnq1 mRNA levels during TP in the presence of TSA were not significantly different from untreated controls or from cells subjected to TP alone, respectively, following correction for multiple statistical comparisons (Fig. 6 A, B and F).

Fig. 6.

Differential effects of electrical tachypacing (TP) and HDAC inhibition using 100 nM trichostatin A (TSA) on potassium channel mRNA levels. A.-F. Kcnq1 (A), Kcnk2 (B), Kcnj2 (C), Kcnj3 (D), Kcnj5 (E), and Kcnd3 (F) mRNA expression under indicated experimental conditions was calculated relative to untreated controls (Ctrl.) as mean (±SEM) normalized to glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) (n=3 each). *p< 0.05; **p< 0.01; ***p< 0.001. P values were calculated by ANOVA followed by Holm-Sidak post hoc testing.

Fig. 6.

Differential effects of electrical tachypacing (TP) and HDAC inhibition using 100 nM trichostatin A (TSA) on potassium channel mRNA levels. A.-F. Kcnq1 (A), Kcnk2 (B), Kcnj2 (C), Kcnj3 (D), Kcnj5 (E), and Kcnd3 (F) mRNA expression under indicated experimental conditions was calculated relative to untreated controls (Ctrl.) as mean (±SEM) normalized to glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) (n=3 each). *p< 0.05; **p< 0.01; ***p< 0.001. P values were calculated by ANOVA followed by Holm-Sidak post hoc testing.

Close modal

Electrophysiological effects of HDAC inhibition in cardiomyocytes

This study reveals action potential prolongation by broad spectrum HDAC inhibition in HL-1 atrial cardiomyocytes. Changes of cardiomyocyte electrophysiology were associated with reduced mRNA and protein levels of repolarizing KCNQ1, KCNJ3 and KCNJ5 potassium channels. Inhibition of the IK,Ach channel subunits KCNJ3 and KCNJ5 by tertiapin or by lentiviral knock-down was previously shown to prolong action potential duration in neonatal rat atrial cardiomyocytes and in intact atria [43]. Furthermore, reduction of repolarizing IKs conducted by KCNQ1/KCNE1 channels caused by genetic mutation or pharmacological inhibition accounts for APD prolongation and long QT syndrome [44-46]. Thus, decreased KCNJ3, KCNJ5 and KCNQ1 levels are likely to contribute mechanistically to prolonged cardiac repolarization after HDAC inhibition. Of note, regulation of additional (non-potassium) ion channels that were not investigated here may have contributed to APD regulation as well. Other K+ channels (i.e., KCNK2, KCNJ2 and KCND3) were upregulated in response to pan-HDAC inhibition. Enhanced levels of voltage-gated potassium channels in isolation are expected to shorten action potential duration. Here, K+ channel upregulation may have attenuated the prolongation of repolarization by K+ channel suppression in HL-1 cells. However, it is important to note that overall expression levels of Kcnk2, Kcnj2 and Kcnd3 mRNAs were relatively low compared to Kcnq1, Kcnj3 and Kcnj5 (Fig. 3 A). Thus, low abundance of Kcnk2, Kcnj2 and Kcnd3 likely accounts for the lack of action potential shortening despite increased channel mRNA expression. Both shortening and prolongation of cardiomyocyte APD are clinically relevant, as they might either promote heart rhythm disorders or could be exploited for antiarrhythmic therapy, depending on the type of arrhythmia and on individual electrophysiological conditions.

The emerging role of HDACs in atrial fibrillation pathophysiology and therapy

Effective and safe management of AF still poses a major clinical challenge in cardiovascular medicine. Antiarrhythmic drugs frequently rely on non-selective inhibition of potassium or sodium channels, resulting in prolongation of APD, refractory periods, or electrical conduction velocity [47]. To date there is no clinical antiarrhythmic concept targeting arrhythmia-induced electrical remodeling. HDACs represent potential novel targets as they may act as key regulators of proarrhythmic gene programs. Shortening of atrial effective refractory periods and APD are observed in chronic AF patients, promoting electrical re-entry and perpetuation of the arrhythmia [7]. In the present work, HDAC inhibition prolonged atrial APD, suggesting that HDAC inhibition may be utilized in antiarrhythmic interventions in patients with chronic (i.e., persistent or long-standing persistent) AF. Antagonistic molecular effects of AF and HDAC-inhibition, respectively, provide the cellular electrophysiological basis for a novel rhythm control paradigm. Of note, in this study we employed a non-selective HDAC inhibitor, resulting in cumulative effects of multiple HDACs on cardiac cellular electrophysiology. Future translation of this epigenetics-based concept will require the identification of specific HDACs involved in proarrhythmic ion channel remodeling during AF.

Significance of HDAC inhibition in ventricular electrophysiology and safety pharmacology

The clinical application of HDAC inhibitors for anticancer treatment is associated with QT prolongation and ventricular arrhythmias [21-24, 48]. TSA-induced APD prolongation in cardiomyocytes is consistent with QT interval prolongation observed in humans during clinical application of small molecule HDAC inhibitors. While extrapolations from experiments in atrial HL-1 cells to ventricular repolarization are limited by differences in ion channel expression between atrial and ventricular cardiomyocytes, the majority of channels that are relevant to safety pharmacology are present in the cells investigated here (i.e., KCNQ1 and KCNH2). In particular, reduced KCNQ1 levels (conducting the slowly activating component of the delayed rectifier K+ current in ventricular myocytes, IKs) could account for ventricular proarrhythmia during clinical application of TSA. Of note, Kcnh2 mRNA encoding the rapidly activating IKr that is frequently affected by QT-prolonging compounds [49-52] was not reduced by TSA. Finally, KCNJ3 and KCNJ5 mRNAs display very low ventricular expression in humans [7]. Therefore, TSA- and HDAC-dependent modulation of encoded IK,ACh is not expected to contribute significantly to ventricular electrophysiology. Based on these findings we suggest that effects of HDAC inhibitors on KCNQ1 subunits should be carefully considered during preclinical safety assessment.

Potential limitations and future directions

The present approach does not allow for the identification of specific HDAC isoforms responsible for the regulation of potassium channel expression. TSA was applied to achieve broad inhibition of multiple class I/II HDACs to assess cumulative HDAC effects in HL-1 atrial cardiomyocytes. Given that different HDAC isoforms may govern specific gene expression programs in physiology and disease, the future investigation of isoform-selective inhibitors may identify compounds with improved target specificity, efficacy and safety. Furthermore, alterations of protein acetylation may directly affect cardiac ion channel biophysics and regulation that were not addressed in this investigation.

In the present study we used a 12 h tachypacing period with a moderate pacing rate to mimic typical episodes of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. The lack of transcriptional effects on potassium channel subunits may be attributable to the short duration of tachypacing, as K+ channel remodeling is time- and rate-dependent under experimental conditions [53]. Therefore, we cannot exclude that additional electrical alterations may occur during longer AF simulation periods that may more closely resemble chronic AF. Furthermore, neurohumoral proarrhythmic mechanisms may not be fully represented by rapid pacing of cultured cells.

Finally, the study focused on the emerging role of histone modification in cardiac arrhythmogenesis and antiarrhythmic therapy. In addition to HDAC-dependent transcriptional regulation, DNA hypermethylation was observed in AF patients, and pharmacologic hypomethylation suppressed atrial arrhythmias in a rat model [54, 55]. We suggest that mechanisms related to methylation and other epigenetic factors involved in electrical remodeling are beyond the scope of the present work and remain to be investigated in separate approaches.

Effects of HDAC inhibition and increased histone acetylation on potassium channel expression and cardiomyocyte APD highlight previously unrecognized epigenetic regulation of cardiac electrophysiology. Pharmacological targeting of specific HDACs may exert antiarrhythmic effects by preventing or correcting ion channel remodeling. Potential proarrhythmic effects of broad-spectrum HDAC inhibitors on ventricular repolarization require consideration during preclinical drug safety screening.

We are grateful to Johannes Backs for providing the real-time PCR cycler and helpful suggestions. This work was supported in part by research grants from the University of Heidelberg, Faculty of Medicine (Postdoctoral Fellowships to P.L. and to A.K.R.), from the German Cardiac Society (Fellowships to P.L. and to A.K.R.), from the Ernst und Berta Grimmke-Stiftung (to P.L.), from the German Cardiac Society and the Hengstberger Foundation (Klaus-Georg and Sigrid Hengstberger Scholarship to D.T.), from the German Heart Foundation/ German Foundation of Heart Research (Kaltenbach Scholarship to K.G. and D.G., Project F/08/14 to D.T.), from the Else Kröner Fresenius-Stiftung (2014_A242 to D.T.), from the Joachim Siebeneicher Foundation (to D.T.), and from the Ministry of Science, Research and the Arts Baden-Wuerttemberg (Sonderlinie Medizin to D.T.). F.W. and D.G. were supported by the Cardiology Career Program of the Department of Cardiology, University of Heidelberg. F.W. and P.S. were supported by the Otto-Hess-Scholarship of the German Cardiac Society.

The authors declare to have no competing interests.

1.
Yue L, Melnyk P, Gaspo R, Wang Z, Nattel S: Molecular mechanisms underlying ionic remodeling in a dog model of atrial fibrillation. Circ Res 1999; 84: 776-784.
2.
Gaborit N, Steenman M, Lamirault G, Le Meur N, Le Bouter S, Lande G, Leger J, Charpentier F, Christ T, Dobrev D, Escande D, Nattel S, Demolombe S: Human atrial ion channel and transporter subunit gene-expression remodeling associated with valvular heart disease and atrial fibrillation. Circulation 2005; 112: 471-481.
3.
Schmidt C, Wiedmann F, Tristram F, Anand P, Wenzel W, Lugenbiel P, Schweizer PA, Katus HA, Thomas D: Cardiac expression and atrial fibrillation-associated remodeling of K2P2.1 (TREK-1) K+ channels in a porcine model. Life Sci 2014; 97: 107-115.
4.
4Schweizer PA, Schröter J, Greiner S, Haas J, Yampolsky P, Mereles D, Buss SJ, Seyler C, Bruehl C, Draguhn A, Koenen M, Meder B, Katus HA, Thomas D: The symptom complex of familial sinus node dysfunction and myocardial non-compaction is associated with mutations in the HCN4 channel. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 64: 757-767.
5.
Voigt N, Heijman J, Wang Q, Chiang DY, Li N, Karck M, Wehrens XH, Nattel S, Dobrev D: Cellular and molecular mechanisms of atrial arrhythmogenesis in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Circulation 2014; 129: 145-156.
6.
Nattel S, Maguy A, Le Bouter S, Yeh YH: Arrhythmogenic ion-channel remodeling in the heart: Heart failure, myocardial infarction, and atrial fibrillation. Physiol Rev 2007; 87: 425-456.
7.
Schmidt C, Wiedmann F, Voigt N, Zhou XB, Heijman J, Lang S, Albert V, Kallenberger S, Ruhparwar A, Szabo G, Kallenbach K, Karck M, Borggrefe M, Biliczki P, Ehrlich JR, Baczko I, Lugenbiel P, Schweizer PA, Donner B, Katus HA, Dobrev D, Thomas D: Upregulation of K2P3.1 K+ current causes action potential shortening in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation. Circulation 2015; 132: 82-92.
8.
Wang TJ, Larson MG, Levy D, Vasan RS, Leip EP, Wolf PA, D'Agostino RB, Murabito JM, Kannel WB, Benjamin EJ: Temporal relations of atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure and their joint influence on mortality: The Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 2003; 107: 2920-2925.
9.
Kato T, Yamashita T, Sagara K, Iinuma H, Fu LT: Progressive nature of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Observations from a 14-year follow-up study. Circ J 2004; 68: 568-572.
10.
Kerr CR, Humphries KH, Talajic M, Klein GJ, Connolly SJ, Green M, Boone J, Sheldon R, Dorian P, Newman D: Progression to chronic atrial fibrillation after the initial diagnosis of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: Results from the canadian registry of atrial fibrillation. Am Heart J 2005; 149: 489-496.
11.
Kornberg RD, Lorch Y: Twenty-five years of the nucleosome, fundamental particle of the eukaryote chromosome. Cell 1999; 98: 285-294.
12.
Jenuwein T, Allis CD: Translating the histone code. Science 2001; 293: 1074-1080.
13.
Backs J, Olson EN: Control of cardiac growth by histone acetylation/deacetylation. Circ Res 2006; 98: 15-24.
14.
Antos CL, McKinsey TA, Dreitz M, Hollingsworth LM, Zhang CL, Schreiber K, Rindt H, Gorczynski RJ, Olson EN: Dose-dependent blockade to cardiomyocyte hypertrophy by histone deacetylase inhibitors. J Biol Chem 2003; 278: 28930-28937.
15.
Kook H, Lepore JJ, Gitler AD, Lu MM, Wing-Man Yung W, Mackay J, Zhou R, Ferrari V, Gruber P, Epstein JA: Cardiac hypertrophy and histone deacetylase-dependent transcriptional repression mediated by the atypical homeodomain protein hop. J Clin Invest 2003; 112: 863-871.
16.
Backs J, Worst BC, Lehmann LH, Patrick DM, Jebessa Z, Kreusser MM, Sun Q, Chen L, Heft C, Katus HA, Olson EN: Selective repression of MEF2 activity by PKA-dependent proteolysis of HDAC4. J Cell Biol 2011; 195: 403-415.
17.
Van Wagoner DR, Nattel S: Insights into mechanisms linking cardiac hypertrophy and atrial fibrosis: evidence for a role of histone deacetylase in atrial fibrillation pathophysiology and therapy. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2008; 45: 707-708.
18.
Iyer A, Fenning A, Lim J, Le GT, Reid RC, Halili MA, Fairlie DP, Brown L: Antifibrotic activity of an inhibitor of histone deacetylases in doca-salt hypertensive rats. Br J Pharmacol 2010; 159: 1408-1417.
19.
Kee HJ, Bae EH, Park S, Lee KE, Suh SH, Kim SW, Jeong MH: HDAC inhibition suppresses cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis in DOCA-salt hypertensive rats via regulation of HDAC6/HDAC8 enzyme activity. Kidney Blood Press Res 2013; 37: 229-239.
20.
Montgomery RL, Potthoff MJ, Haberland M, Qi X, Matsuzaki S, Humphries KM, Richardson JA, Bassel-Duby R, Olson EN: Maintenance of cardiac energy metabolism by histone deacetylase 3 in mice. J Clin Invest 2008; 118: 3588-3597.
21.
Rasheed WK, Johnstone RW, Prince HM: Histone deacetylase inhibitors in cancer therapy. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2007; 16: 659-678.
22.
McKinsey TA: Isoform-selective HDAC inhibitors: Closing in on translational medicine for the heart. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2011; 51: 491-496.
23.
Xu Q, Lin X, Andrews L, Patel D, Lampe PD, Veenstra RD: Histone deacetylase inhibition reduces cardiac connexin43 expression and gap junction communication. Front Pharmacol 2013; 4: 44.
24.
Xu Q, Patel D, Zhang X, Veenstra RD: Changes in cardiac Nav1.5 expression, function, and acetylation by pan-histone deacetylase inhibitors. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2016; 311:H1139-H1149.
25.
Kee HJ, Sohn IS, Nam KI, Park JE, Qian YR, Yin Z, Ahn Y, Jeong MH, Bang YJ, Kim N, Kim JK, Kim KK, Epstein JA, Kook H: Inhibition of histone deacetylation blocks cardiac hypertrophy induced by angiotensin ii infusion and aortic banding. Circulation 2006; 113: 51-59.
26.
Kong Y, Tannous P, Lu G, Berenji K, Rothermel BA, Olson EN, Hill JA: Suppression of class i and ii histone deacetylases blunts pressure-overload cardiac hypertrophy. Circulation 2006; 113: 2579-2588.
27.
Liu F, Levin MD, Petrenko NB, Lu MM, Wang T, Yuan LJ, Stout AL, Epstein JA, Patel VV: Histone-deacetylase inhibition reverses atrial arrhythmia inducibility and fibrosis in cardiac hypertrophy independent of angiotensin. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2008; 45: 715-723.
28.
Chandrasekaran S, Peterson RE, Mani SK, Addy B, Buchholz AL, Xu L, Thiyagarajan T, Kasiganesan H, Kern CB, Menick DR: Histone deacetylases facilitate sodium/calcium exchanger up-regulation in adult cardiomyocytes. FASEB J 2009; 23: 3851-3864.
29.
Marks PA, Richon VM, Rifkind RA: Histone deacetylase inhibitors: Inducers of differentiation or apoptosis of transformed cells. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000; 92: 1210-1216.
30.
Miller TA, Witter DJ, Belvedere S: Histone deacetylase inhibitors. J Med Chem 2003; 46: 5097-5116.
31.
Finnin MS, Donigian JR, Cohen A, Richon VM, Rifkind RA, Marks PA, Breslow R, Pavletich NP: Structures of a histone deacetylase homologue bound to the TSA and SAHA inhibitors. Nature 1999; 401: 188-193.
32.
Vannini A, Volpari C, Filocamo G, Casavola EC, Brunetti M, Renzoni D, Chakravarty P, Paolini C, De Francesco R, Gallinari P, Steinkühler C, Di Marco S: Crystal structure of a eukaryotic zinc-dependent histone deacetylase, human HDAC8, complexed with a hydroxamic acid inhibitor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004; 101: 15064-15069.
33.
Mottamal M, Zheng S, Huang TL, Wang G: Histone deacetylase inhibitors in clinical studies as templates for new anticancer agents. Molecules 2015; 20: 3898-3941.
34.
Claycomb WC, Lanson NA, Jr., Stallworth BS, Egeland DB, Delcarpio JB, Bahinski A, Izzo NJ, Jr.: Hl-1 cells: A cardiac muscle cell line that contracts and retains phenotypic characteristics of the adult cardiomyocyte. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95: 2979-2984.
35.
Yang Z, Shen W, Rottman JN, Wikswo JP, Murray KT: Rapid stimulation causes electrical remodeling in cultured atrial myocytes. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2005; 38: 299-308.
36.
Jehle J, Staudacher I, Wiedmann F, Schweizer P, Becker R, Katus H, Thomas D: Regulation of apoptosis in hl-1 cardiomyocytes by phosphorylation of the receptor tyrosine kinase EphA2 and protection by lithocholic acid. Br J Pharmacol 2012; 167: 1563-1572.
37.
Trappe K, Thomas D, Bikou O, Kelemen K, Lugenbiel P, Voss F, Becker R, Katus HA, Bauer A: Suppression of persistent atrial fibrillation by genetic knockdown of caspase 3: a pre-clinical pilot study. Eur Heart J 2013; 34: 147-157.
38.
Lugenbiel P, Wenz F, Govorov K, Schweizer PA, Katus HA, Thomas D: Atrial fibrillation complicated by heart failure induces distinct remodeling of calcium cycling proteins. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0116395.
39.
Lugenbiel P, Wenz F, Govorov K, Syren P, Katus HA, Thomas D: Atrial myofibroblast activation and connective tissue formation in a porcine model of atrial fibrillation and reduced left ventricular function. Life Sci 2017; 181: 1-8.
40.
Lugenbiel P, Wenz F, Syren P, Geschwill P, Govorov K, Seyler C, Frank D, Schweizer PA, Franke J, Weis T, Bruehl C, Schmack B, Ruhparwar A, Karck M, Frey N, Katus HA, Thomas D: TREK.-1 (K2P2.1) K+ channels are suppressed in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure and provide therapeutic targets for rhythm control. Basic Res Cardiol 2017; 112: 8.
41.
Yang T, Wathen MS, Felipe A, Tamkun MM, Snyders DJ, Roden DM: K+ currents and K+ channel mRNA in cultured atrial cardiac myocytes (AT-1 cells). Circ Res 1994; 75: 870-878.
42.
Lugenbiel P, Schweizer PA, Katus HA, Thomas D: Antiarrhythmic gene therapy - will biologics replace catheters, drugs and devices? Eur J Pharmacol 2016; 791: 264-273.
43.
Bingen BO, Neshati Z, Askar SF, Kazbanov IV, Ypey DL, Panfilov AV, Schalij MJ, de Vries AA, Pijnappels DA: Atrium-specific Kir3.X determines inducibility, dynamics, and termination of fibrillation by regulating restitution-driven alternans. Circulation 2013; 128: 2732-2744.
44.
Thomas D, Kathöfer S, Zhang W, Wu K, Wimmer AB, Zitron E, Kreye VAW, Katus HA, Schoels W, Karle CA, Kiehn J: Acute effects of dronedarone on both components of the cardiac delayed rectifier K+ current, HERG and KvLQT1/minK potassium channels. Br J Pharmacol 2003; 140: 996-1002.
45.
Thomas D, Wimmer AB, Karle CA, Licka M, Alter M, Khalil M, Ulmer HE, Kathöfer S, Kiehn J, Katus HA, Schoels W, Koenen M, Zehelein J: Dominant-negative IKs suppression by KCNQ1-ΔF339 potassium channels linked to Romano-Ward syndrome. Cardiovasc Res 2005; 67: 487-497.
46.
Thomas D, Khalil M, Alter M, Schweizer PA, Karle CA, Wimmer AB, Licka M, Katus HA, Koenen M, Ulmer HE, Zehelein J: Biophysical characterization of KCNQ1 P320 mutations linked to long QT syndrome 1. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2010; 48: 230-237.
47.
Kumar K, Zimetbaum PJ: Antiarrhythmic drugs 2013: State of the art. Curr Cardiol Rep 2013; 15: 410.
48.
Monneret C: Histone deacetylase inhibitors. Eur J Med Chem 2005; 40: 1-13.
49.
Thomas D, Karle CA, Kiehn J: The cardiac hERG/IKr potassium channel as pharmacological target: structure, function, regulation, and clinical applications. Curr Pharm Design 2006; 12: 2271-2283.
50.
Staudacher I, Schweizer PA, Katus HA, Thomas D: hERG: Protein trafficking and potential for therapy and drug side effects. Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel 2010; 13: 23-30.
51.
Staudacher I, Wang L, Wan X, Obers S, Wenzel W, Tristram F, Koschny R, Staudacher K, Kisselbach J, Koelsch P, Schweizer PA, Katus HA, Ficker E, Thomas D: hERG K+ channel-associated cardiac effects of the antidepressant drug desipramine. Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 2011; 383: 119-139.
52.
Jehle J, Ficker E, Wan X, Deschênes I, Kisselbach J, Wiedmann F, Staudacher I, Schmidt C, Schweizer P, Becker R, Katus H, Thomas D: Mechanisms of zolpidem-induced long QT syndrome: Acute inhibition of recombinant hERG K+ channels and action potential prolongation in human cardiomyocytes derived from induced pluripotent stem cells. Br J Pharmacol 2013; 168: 1215-1229.
53.
Yamashita T, Murakawa Y, Hayami N, Fukui E, Kasaoka Y, Inoue M, Omata M: Short-term effects of rapid pacing on mRNA level of voltage-dependent K+ channels in rat atrium: Electrical remodeling in paroxysmal atrial tachycardia. Circulation 2000; 101: 2007-2014.
54.
Doñate Puertas R, Meugnier E, Romestaing C, Rey C, Morel E, Lachuer J, Gadot N, Scridon A, Julien C, Tronc F, Chapuis B, Valla C, Janin A, Pirola L, Méjat A, Rome S, Chevalier P: Atrial fibrillation is associated with hypermethylation in human left atrium, and treatment with decitabine reduces atrial tachyarrhythmias in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Transl Res 2017; 184: 57-67.
55.
Lin H, Yin X, Xie Z, Lunetta KL, Lubitz SA, Larson MG, Ko D, Magnani JW, Mendelson MM, Liu C, McManus DD, Levy D, Ellinor PT, Benjamin EJ: Methylome-wide association study of atrial fibrillation in Framingham Heart Study. Sci Rep 2017; 7: 40377.
Open Access License / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND). Usage and distribution for commercial purposes as well as any distribution of modified material requires written permission. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.