Background/Aims: Basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) and nerve growth factor (NGF) are essential for proper development, survival, growth, and maintenance of neurons in the central and peripheral nervous systems. However, because bFGF and NGF have short half-life and rapid diffusion rate, they have limited clinical efficacy. Thus, there is an urgent need to develop an effective delivery system to protect bFGF and NGF from proteolysis while maintaining their normal bioactivities. Methods: To more efficiently deliver bFGF and NGF, we used a coacervate (synthesized with heparin and a biodegradable polycation at mass ratio of 500: 100). The maximal package loads of GFs in coacervate were determined by Western Blotting; release efficiency of bFGF and NGF was measured by ELISA. Additionally, we evaluated the effect of bFGF and NGF on the viability, survival, and proliferation of neurons by MTT assay, BrdU cell proliferation, and calcein staining. Results: Our coacervate incorporated bFGF and NGF and continuously released them for at least three weeks. This enhanced the growth and proliferation of PC12 cells and SH-SY5Y cells. Moreover, co-delivery of bFGF and NGF using coacervate was more neuroprotective than free application of both factors or coacervate delivery of each GF separately. Conclusions: Dual delivery of bFGF and NGF binding coacervate was neuroprotective via stimulating the growth and proliferation of neurons.

Neurodegenerative diseases are a major socioeconomic burden and lead to unimaginable misery for millions of sufferers and their families around the world. With an increasing ageing population, the number of neurodegenerative diseases is expected to rise even further, prompting an urgent need for the development of rational and effective therapeutic strategies that can reverse or slow the degenerative process. Stem cell therapy, growth factors, and gene therapy are novel treatments that might prolong survival and delay progression of symptoms [1-4]. Growth factor treatment is one of the most promising therapies for neurodegenerative diseases, due to their great potential for neurorestoration and neuroprotection.

Within the family of neurotrophic factors, nerve growth factor (NGF) stimulates the survival and maturation of developing neurons in the peripheral nervous system and protects neurons in the degenerating mammalian brain [5-8]. It has been used as a therapeutic agent for the restoration and maintenance of neuronal function in both basic and clinical studies. Basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) is highly expressed in the nervous system and exerts multiple roles supporting the survival and growth of cultured neurons and neural stem cells [8-10]. Although bFGF and NGF have distinctive neuroprotective properties, their short half-life and rapid diffusion rate seriously hinders their clinical applicability. Thus, the development of a useful delivery system that not only protects the GFs from proteolytic degradation and controls their spatiotemporal release, but also avoids side effects from high concentrations of GFs for body would greatly improve their clinical efficacy.

[PEAD:heparin] coacervate is formed by a polycation, poly ethylene arginyl aspartate diglyceride (PEAD), and heparin [11]. PEAD is a biodegradable polycation with high biocompatibility and high charge density, which strongly binds to heparin and consequently is capable of incorporating growth factors with high efficiency [11].Previous studies have demonstrated that [PEAD:heparin] coacervate controls the release of growth factors for over 30 days in a nearly linear fashion, can maintain the bioactivity of bFGF, and can increase the bioactivity of NGF [8], indicating that [PEAD:heparin] coacervate may be an optimal delivery system for growth factors for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases.

Although the delivery of a single GF, bFGF or NGF, has shown promising therapeutic potency for neurodegenerative diseases, co-delivery of multiple GFs may be more successful in therapy. In this study, we co-delivered bFGF and NGF via [PEAD:heparin] coacervate and examined the effect of controlled co-release of bFGF and NGF on PC12 cells and SH-SY5Y cells. We hypothesized that co-delivery of bFGF and NGF would have a stronger and more robust neuroprotective effect than that of individual GF coacervates and the co-administration of free GFs.

Reagents and antibodies

Recombinant human bFGF was purchased from Grost (Grost Biotechnology, Zhejiang, China). NGF and heparin were purchased from Sigma (Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). PEAD was a gift from the University of Pittsburgh. NGF and bFGF enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits were purchased from Elabscience Biotechnology. Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) and fetal bovine serum (FBS) were purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, USA).

[PEAD:heparin] coacervate synthesis and maximal package loads of GFs

Poly ethylene argininylaspartate diglyceride (PEAD) was synthesized as previously described [11]. PEAD, heparin, NGF and bFGF were seriatim dissolved in 0.9% normal saline to obtain 10 mg.mL-1 solutions and sterilized using 0.22 µm Millipore filter. We used a PEAD:heparin:GF with mass ratio of 500: 100: 1 to achieve maximal coacervation. The bFGF was loaded into the coacervate at doses of 50ng, 100ng and 10µg respectively; the NGF was loaded at doses of 1µg, 2µg and 10µg respectively. After 2 h, the solution was then centrifuged at 12000g for 10 min to pellet the coacervate at 4°C. The supernatant was aspirated and stored, and pellet was re-suspended using loading buffer to detect the maximal package loads of GFs in coacervate by Western blotting.

Western blotting

To detect the maximal package loads of GFs, protein concentrations were quantified using a BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo, Rockford, IL, USA). The equivalent of total protein was loaded onto SDS-PAGE, transferred to PVDF membrane (Bio-Rad), and blocked with 5% non-fat-milk in TBS with 0.05% Tween 20 (TBST) for 45min. Primary antibodies were incubated overnight at 4°C. The membranes were washed with TBST for 3 times and incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (1: 10000) for 4h at room temperature. Signals were visualized using the ChemiDocTM XRS +Imaging System (Bio-Rad).

Growth factors release assay

On day 1, 4, 7, 14, 21, 28 and 35, PEAD: heparin: GF coacervates with maximal package loads of bFGF and NGF were gently mixed and centrifuged at 12, 000 g for 10 min. Then, the supernatant was collected to detect the amount of released GFs via ELISA kit. Standards containing 200 ng free-form GFs were used to determine the percent release. The samples and standards were reacted with assay buffer. The absorbance of the supernatant was recorded by a SynergyMX plate reader at 450/540 nm.

Cell viability measurements

MTT assay was used to determine cell viability and the optimal concentration of bFGF and NGF. Briefly, cells were plated at a density of 8000 per well in a 96-well plate. After 6 h, the cells were washed with PBS and cultured in serum-free medium. Then, the cells were treated with bFGF and NGF at doses of 50nM,100nM,200nM and 400nM respectively. After 24 h incubation, 20uL MTT buffer was added to each well. The absorbance was recorded by a SynergyMX plate reader at 490 nm.

Detection of cell growth status

PC12 cells and SH-SY5Y cells were plated at a density of 8000 per well in a 96-well plate. 6h after seeding, group-specific media was added and 8 groups were used with 5 wells per group: basal media, blank coacervate, free bFGF, free NGF, free bFGF+NGF, bFGF coacervate, NGF coacervate, and bFGF+NGF coacervate. Each GF was added at an optimal concentration according to MTT assay results. Cell growth status was observed and captured under an inverted microscope (Nikon ECLIPSE Ti-S). The area of cell number was quantitatively analyzed.

The proliferation of neuronal cells and live cell

Similar culture conditions were used for detecting the level of cell proliferation and performing live cell count assays. PC12 cells and SH-SY5Y cells were labeled with calcein AM for 2 h before seeding cells in 100 µL media per well in a 96-well plate. 6 h after seeding, group-specific media was added and 8 groups were used with 5 wells per group: basal media, blank coacervate, free bFGF, free NGF, free bFGF+NGF, bFGF coacervate, NGF coacervate, and bFGF+NGF coacervate. Each GF was added at an optimal concentration. For the BrdU cell proliferation assay, the plate was incubated at 37°C for 16 h, then 20 uL of BrdU label was added to each well and incubated for 4 h. The proliferation assay protocol was then followed according to the kit’s instruction manual. After the addition of stop solution, the absorbance at 450/540 nm was recorded by a SynergyMX plate reader and normalized to the basal media control. For the live cell count assay, the plate was incubated at 37°C for 3 d, then cells were observed using a fluorescence microscope. The number of cells was determined by manually counting the cells in a 0.67 mm2 field in the center of the well for 5 wells per group. Fluorescent images of cells were taken of 4 mm2 fields.

Statistical analysis

Data is presented as the mean ± SD. Statistical differences were evaluated using One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s test with GraphPad Prism 5 software. Differences were suggested to be statistically significant when P < 0.05.

Loads and release efficiency of bFGF and NGF in [PEAD:heparin] coacervate

It had been demonstrated that maximal coacervation occurs at a mass ratio of 500: 100: 1 PEAD:heparin:GF [12]. In this study, we utilized PEAD:heparin:GF coacervate with this mass ratio and observed that the coacervate became turbid and precipitated immediately with bound GFs to the coacervate (Fig. 1A). After 24 h, the coavervate became pellucid and settled on the bottom of the tube (Fig. 1A). The maximal loads of bFGF and NGF in [PEAD:heparin] coacervate were detected by Western blotting. 100ng, 200ng and 10µg of bFGF and 1ug, 2ug and 10µg of NGF were bound to coacervate. The maximal loading capacity of each was found to be 10µg (Fig. 1B). To further investigate the release efficiency of GFs that bound with coacervate, we measured the release amount of bFGF and NGF by ELISA on days 1, 4, 7, 14, 21, 28 and 35.NGF and bFGF were immediately released on day 1, and then sustained from day 1 to day 21. Afterwards, both were released slower and gradually trended to stabilize. By day 35, the total release of NGF and bFGF were approximately 60% and 30%, respectively. Taken together, this not only demonstrated that coavervate loading with GFs contributes to their slow release, but also indicated that the release efficiency of NGF was higher than that of bFGF in coacervate.

Fig. 1.

Properties of [PEAD:heparin] coacervate binding with bFGF or NGF. (A) Preparation of [PEAD:heparin] coacervate. (B) Western blotting analysis of the loading efficiency of bFGF and NGF into coacervate. S: bFGF or NGF in supernatant after centrifugation. C: bFGF or NGF in settled coacervates. L: total amount of bFGF or NGF in loading solution. (C) Release efficiency of bFGF and NGF in [PEAD:heparin] coacervate. (n= 3 per group).

Fig. 1.

Properties of [PEAD:heparin] coacervate binding with bFGF or NGF. (A) Preparation of [PEAD:heparin] coacervate. (B) Western blotting analysis of the loading efficiency of bFGF and NGF into coacervate. S: bFGF or NGF in supernatant after centrifugation. C: bFGF or NGF in settled coacervates. L: total amount of bFGF or NGF in loading solution. (C) Release efficiency of bFGF and NGF in [PEAD:heparin] coacervate. (n= 3 per group).

Close modal

Determining the optimal protective concentration of bFGF and NGF on PC12 cells and SH-SY5Y cells

To test the optimal protective concentration of bFGF and NGF on PC12 cells and SH-SY5Y cells, we assessed the cell viability of PC12 cells and SH-SY5Y cells after treatment with different doses of each GF. We found 100 ng/mL to be the optimal protective concentration of bFGF on PC12 cells and SH-SY5Y cells (Fig. 2). Additionally, 100ng/mL and 200ng/mL of NGF were the optimal protective concentrations for PC12 cells and SH-SY5Y cells (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

The optimal protective concentration of bFGF and NGF on PC12 cells and SH-SY5Y cells. (A) The optimal protective concentration of bFGF and NGF on PC12 cells. (B) The optimal protective concentration of bFGF and NGF on SH-SY5Y cells. *P< 0.05 vs. the other groups.

Fig. 2.

The optimal protective concentration of bFGF and NGF on PC12 cells and SH-SY5Y cells. (A) The optimal protective concentration of bFGF and NGF on PC12 cells. (B) The optimal protective concentration of bFGF and NGF on SH-SY5Y cells. *P< 0.05 vs. the other groups.

Close modal

bFGF+NGF coacervate promotes the growth of PC12 cells and SH-SY5Y cells

To assess how bFGF and NGF affect neuronal cell growth, PC12 cells were cultured in serum-free culture medium and each GF was applied separately or together in free-form or coacervate-bound. PC12 cells in serum-free culture medium had fewer cell number and abnormal morphology with karyopyknotic nuclei and shortened axons (Fig. 3A, B). Treatment with bFGF and NGF together in free-form recovered PC12 cell growth better than each GF alone. Moreover, each GF alone delivered by coacervate also significantly promoted PC12 cells growth when compared to free GF delivery. Importantly, compared to the other groups, dual delivery of bFGF and NGF in coavervate was the most beneficial to PC12 cells growth as evidenced by increased cell number and normal morphology (Fig. 3A, B). Consistent with our findings in PC12 cells, dual delivery of bFGF and NGF bound to coacervate also significantly promoted SH-SY5Y cells growth (Fig. 4A, B).

Fig. 3.

bFGF+NGF coacervate promotes the cell growth of PC12 cells. (A) Quantitative analysis of the number of PC12 cells. (n= 8 per group). *P< 0.05 indicated Free bFGF+NGF, bFGF+coacervate and NGF+coacervate vs. basal medial, blank coacervate, free bFGF and free NGF group; #P< 0.05 indicated bFGF+NGF+coacervate vs. the other groups. (B) The morphology of PC12 cells after treatment.

Fig. 3.

bFGF+NGF coacervate promotes the cell growth of PC12 cells. (A) Quantitative analysis of the number of PC12 cells. (n= 8 per group). *P< 0.05 indicated Free bFGF+NGF, bFGF+coacervate and NGF+coacervate vs. basal medial, blank coacervate, free bFGF and free NGF group; #P< 0.05 indicated bFGF+NGF+coacervate vs. the other groups. (B) The morphology of PC12 cells after treatment.

Close modal
Fig. 4.

bFGF+NGF coacervate promotes the cell growth of SH-SY5Y cells. (A) Quantitative analysis of the number of SH-SY5Y cells. (n= 8 per group). *P< 0.05 indicated Free bFGF+NGF, bFGF+coacervate and NGF+coacervate vs. basal medial, blank coacervate, free bFGF and free NGF group; #P< 0.05 indicated bFGF+NGF+coacervate vs. the other groups. (B) The morphology of SH-SY5Y cells after treatment.

Fig. 4.

bFGF+NGF coacervate promotes the cell growth of SH-SY5Y cells. (A) Quantitative analysis of the number of SH-SY5Y cells. (n= 8 per group). *P< 0.05 indicated Free bFGF+NGF, bFGF+coacervate and NGF+coacervate vs. basal medial, blank coacervate, free bFGF and free NGF group; #P< 0.05 indicated bFGF+NGF+coacervate vs. the other groups. (B) The morphology of SH-SY5Y cells after treatment.

Close modal

bFGF+NGF coacervate induces the proliferation of PC12 cells and SH-SY5Y cells

In this study, we further investigated the effect of bFGF and NGF on the proliferation of PC12 cells. PC12 cells were treated with each GF separately or together, in free-form or coacervate bound. 1 day after treatment, Free-form dual delivery of GFs and each GF alone delivered by coacervate significantly induced greater proliferation compared to each GF alone. Furthermore, dual delivery of bFGF and NGF with coacervate had a stronger effect compared to the other groups (Fig. 5 A). Calcein staining was used to verify the cell proliferation beyond 1 day, and cells were still viable after 3 days culture. Consistent with these results, co-delivery of bFGF and NGF bound to coacervate exerted a stronger proliferative effect and induced more live cells compared to the other group (Fig. 5 B, C). Additionally, the bFGF+NGF coacervate could significantly induce the proliferation of SH-SY5Y cells (Fig. 6 A, B and C). Taken together, these results demonstrated that co-delivery of bFGF and NGF with coacer-vate had the greatest potential for promoting the proliferation of neuronal cells.

Fig. 5.

bFGF+NGF coacervate induces the proliferation of PC12 cells. (A) The proliferation level of PC12 cells after treatment with free GFs or coacervate delivery of GFs. (B) Live PC12 cells number was quantified after 3 days incubation over 0.67 mm2 fields in 3 wells per group. (C) Microscope images of calcein-stained PC12 cells. *P< 0.05 indicated Free bFGF+NGF, bFGF+coacervate and NGF+coacervate vs. basal medial, blank coacervate, free bFGF and free NGF group; #P< 0.05 indicated bFGF+NGF+coacervate vs. the other groups.

Fig. 5.

bFGF+NGF coacervate induces the proliferation of PC12 cells. (A) The proliferation level of PC12 cells after treatment with free GFs or coacervate delivery of GFs. (B) Live PC12 cells number was quantified after 3 days incubation over 0.67 mm2 fields in 3 wells per group. (C) Microscope images of calcein-stained PC12 cells. *P< 0.05 indicated Free bFGF+NGF, bFGF+coacervate and NGF+coacervate vs. basal medial, blank coacervate, free bFGF and free NGF group; #P< 0.05 indicated bFGF+NGF+coacervate vs. the other groups.

Close modal
Fig. 6.

bFGF+NGF coacervate induces the proliferation of SH-SY5Y cells. (A) The proliferation level of SH-SY5Y cells after treatment with free GFs or coacervate delivery of GFs. (B) Live SH-SY5Y cells number was quantified after 3 days incubation over 0.67 mm2 fields in 3 wells per group. (C) Microscope images of calcein-stained SH-SY5Y cells. *P< 0.05 indicated Free bFGF+NGF, bFGF+coacervate and NGF+coacervate vs. basal medial, blank coacervate, free bFGF and free NGF group; #P< 0.05 indicated bFGF+NGF+coacervate vs. the other groups.

Fig. 6.

bFGF+NGF coacervate induces the proliferation of SH-SY5Y cells. (A) The proliferation level of SH-SY5Y cells after treatment with free GFs or coacervate delivery of GFs. (B) Live SH-SY5Y cells number was quantified after 3 days incubation over 0.67 mm2 fields in 3 wells per group. (C) Microscope images of calcein-stained SH-SY5Y cells. *P< 0.05 indicated Free bFGF+NGF, bFGF+coacervate and NGF+coacervate vs. basal medial, blank coacervate, free bFGF and free NGF group; #P< 0.05 indicated bFGF+NGF+coacervate vs. the other groups.

Close modal

Neurodegenerative diseases are a more and more serious problem for the aging population in the world. They are characterized by progressive loss of neuronal function in defined regions of the nervous system. Elevated cellular stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, synapse loss, and neuronal apoptosis are the main physiological symptoms of neurodegenerative diseases [13]. No broadly effective strategies have been developed recently to reverse or halt the progression of these diseases in patients. bFGF and NGF have been extensively shown to promote the survival and maintainenance of neuronal function in neurological diseases [14, 15]. A deficiency of these two GFs may cause neuron susceptibility to injury and death [16, 17], suggesting that molecular therapy with exogenous bFGF and NGF may be a novel and challenging therapeutic strategy for neurodegenerative diseases.

However, the application of these GFs, including NGF and bFGF, in clinical therapy is greatly limited by their short half-life. Without efficient delivery systems, GFs degrade quickly and lose their bioactivities, which potentially lead to harmful effects when injected at high concentrations for effective therapy. Moreover, GFs diffuses broadly circulate throughout the body, which leads to adverse effects that can be intolerable. Previous studies reported that NGF led to pain and weight loss by stimulating nociceptive and hypothalamic neurons, respectively [18, 19]. Developing a controlled and useful delivery system that can preserve their processibility and biocompatibility is particularly attractive for their biomedical application. In this study, we utilized [PEAD:heparin] coacervate as a delivery system to deliver NGF and bFGF, and further confirmed the effects of bFGF and NGF on growth and proliferation of neuronal cells.

[PEAD:heparin] coacervate was formed by a polycation, poly(ethylene arginyl aspartate diglyceride) (PEAD) and heparin that can control the release of heparin-binding GFs [20]. The coacervate maintains the native properties and function of heparin through the direct, ionic interactions with PEAD [21], which not only improves GF loading efficiency and maintains their bioactivity, but also well controls the release of GFs to target tissues [20]. Thus, coacervate had been widely used to spatially and temporally control the release of GFs [22-25].

Wang et al. demonstrated that the molecular weight of PEAD and/or heparin, the charge density of PEAD, and the [PEAD:heparin] mass ratio affected the delivery function of [PEAD:heparin] coacervate. Moreover, a PEAD:heparin:GF mass ratio of 500: 100: 1 achieved maximal coacervation [21]. In this study, we developed [PEAD:heparin] coacervate with a PEAD: heparin: GF mass ratio of 500: 100: 1 to deliver bFGF and NGF. Maximal loading was reached with 10µg of bFGF and NGF, and GFs-binding with coacervates sustained their release from day 1 to day 21 (Fig. 1B and C)., indicating that coacervate slows the release of GFs. Additionally, with the different dissociation constant (kd) of bFGF (2 nM) and NGF (600 nM), the release efficiency of NGF(60%) was higher than that of bFGF(30%) in coacervate(Fig. 1C), consistent with our previous study [8].

PC12 cells and SH-SY5Y cells are extensively used as neuronal cell models in vitro [26-28]. In this study, PC12 cells and SH-SY5Y cells were used as a model system to detect the neuroprotective effects of bFGF and NGF. Both bFGF and NGF are known to promotoe an appropriate environment for neurogenesis of stem cells as well as nerve regeneration [29, 30]. We found that bFGF and NGF together in free-form and each GF alone incorporated in coacervate significantly increased the growth and proliferation of PC12 cells and SH-SY5Y cells compared to each GF alone. This study in conjunction with previous studies have demonstrated that combined treatment with NGF and bFGF has a greater potential to promote the proliferation and differentiation of neural stem cells and nerve regeneration [8, 31]. Thus, dual delivery of bFGF and NGF using coacervate greatly increased the growth and proliferation of neuronal cells when compared to all the other groups, suggesting that controlled dual-delivery of bFGF and NGF using [PEAD:heparin] coacervate does not hinder the beneficial effects of bFGF and NGF, but rather improves it when compared to free application of both factors or coacervate delivery of each GF separately.

Our results further confirm the neuroprotective effects of NGF and bFGF on the growth and proliferation of neuronal cell types. Moreover, co-delivery of bFGF and NGF using coacervate displayed the most robust neuroprotective effect individual GF coacervates or co-administration of free GFs. These findings highlight that dual bFGF and NGF-incorporated coacervate may be more effective molecular therapeutics for neurodegenerative diseases.

This study was partially supported by a research grant from the National Natural Science Funding of China (81372112), Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (LY17H090017, R18H50001, LQ15E030003), Zhejiang Provincial Project of Key Scientific Group (2016C33107), Fujian Province for Medical Innovative Health Project (2015-CXB-43).

The authors declare to have no competing interests.

1.
Pandya RS, Mao LLJ, Zhou EW, Bowser R, Zhu Z, Zhu Y, Wang X: Neuroprotection for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Role of Stem Cells, Growth Factors, and Gene Therapy. Cent Nerv Syst Agents Med Chem 2012; 12: 15-27.
2.
Kim SU, Hong JL, Yun BK: Neural stem cell-based treatment for neurodegenerative diseases. Neuropathology 2013; 33: 491.
3.
Byrne JA: Developing neural stem cell-based treatments for neurodegenerative diseases. Stem Cell Res Ther 2014; 5: 72.
4.
O’Connor, Deirdre M, Boulis, Nicholas M: Gene therapy for neurodegenerative diseases. Trends Mol Med 2015; 21: 504.
5.
Allen SJ, Watson JJ, Shoemark DK, Barua NU, Patel NK: GDNF, NGF and BDNF as therapeutic options for neurodegeneration. Pharmacol Therapeut 2013; 138: 155-175.
6.
Tasset I, Sánchez-López F, Agüera E, Fernández-Bolaños R, Sánchez FM, Cruz-Guerrero A, Gascón-Luna F, Túnez I: NGF and nitrosative stress in patients with Huntington’s disease. J Neurol Sci 2012; 315: 133-136.
7.
Cai J, Hua F, Yuan L, Tang W, Lu J, Yu S, Wang X, Hu Y: Potential therapeutic effects of neurotrophins for acute and chronic neurological diseases. Biomed Res Int 2014; 2014: 601084.
8.
Li R, Ma J, Wu Y, Nangle M, Zou S, Li Y, Yin J, Zhao Y, Xu H, Zhang H: Dual Delivery of NGF and bFGF Coacervater Ameliorates Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy via Inhibiting Schwann Cells Apoptosis. Int J Sci 2017; 13: 640.
9.
Cai P, Ye J, Zhu J, Liu D, Chen D, Wei X, Johnson NR, Wang Z, Zhang H, Cao G: Inhibition of Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress is Involved in the Neuroprotective Effect of bFGF in the 6-OHDA-Induced Parkinson’s Disease Model. Aging Dis 2016; 7: 336-449.
10.
Tooyama I: [Fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) in neurodegenerative disorders]. Rinsho Shinkeigaku 1993; 33: 1270-1274.
11.
Chu H, Johnson NR, Mason NS, Wang Y: A [polycation:heparin] complex releases growth factors with enhanced bioactivity. J Control Release 2011; 150: 157-163.
12.
Awada HK, Johnson NR, Wang Y: Dual Delivery of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Hepatocyte Growth Factor Coacervate Displays Strong Angiogenic Effects. Macromol Biosci 2014; 14: 679–686.
13.
Winner B, Kohl Z, Gage FH: Neurodegenerative disease and adult neurogenesis. Eur J Neurosci 2011; 33: 1139.
14.
Andrades JA, Wu LT, Hall FL, Nimni ME, Becerra J: Engineering, expression, and renaturation of a collagen-targeted human bFGF fusion protein. Growth Factors 2001; 18: 261-275.
15.
Lane JT: The role of retinoids in the induction of nerve growth factor: a potential treatment for diabetic neuropathy. Transl Res 2014; 164: 193-195.
16.
Hellweg R, Hartung HD: Endogenous levels of nerve growth factor (NGF) are altered in experimental diabetes mellitus: A possible role for NGF in the pathogenesis of diabetic neuropathy. J Neurosci Res 1990; 26: 258.
17.
Dobrowsky RT, Rouen S, Yu C: Altered neurotrophism in diabetic neuropathy: spelunking the caves of peripheral nerve. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2005; 313: 485.
18.
Tuszynski MH, Yang JH, Barba D, U HS, Bakay R, Pay MM, Masliah E, Conner JM, Kobalka P, Roy S: Nerve Growth Factor Gene Therapy: Activation of Neuronal Responses in Alzheimer Disease. Jama Neurol 2015; 72: 1139.
19.
Bannwarth B, Kostine M: Targeting nerve growth factor (NGF) for pain management: what does the future hold for NGF antagonists? Drugs 2014; 74: 619-626.
20.
Chu H, Johnson NR, Mason NS, Wang Y: A [polycation:heparin] complex releases growth factors with enhanced bioactivity. J Control Release 2011; 150: 157-163.
21.
Awada HK, Johnson NR, Wang Y: Dual Delivery of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Hepatocyte Growth Factor Coacervate Displays Strong Angiogenic Effects. Macromol Biosci 2014; 14: 679.
22.
Awada HK, Johnson NR, Wang Y: Dual Delivery of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor and Hepatocyte Growth Factor Coacervate Displays Strong Angiogenic Effects. Macromol Biosci 2014; 14: 679-686.
23.
Chen WCW, Lee BG, Park DW, Kim K, Chu H, Kang K, Huard J, Wang Y: Controlled dual delivery of fibroblast growth factor-2 and Interleukin-10 by heparin-based coacervate synergistically enhances ischemic heart repair. Biomaterials 2015; 72: 138-151.
24.
Chu H, Chen CW, Huard J, Wang Y: The effect of a heparin-based coacervate of fibroblast growth factor-2 on scarring in the infarcted myocardium. Biomaterials 2013; 34: 1747.
25.
Li H, Johnson NR, Usas A, Lu A, Poddar M, Wang Y, Huard J: Sustained Release of Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 via Coacervate Improves the Osteogenic Potential of Muscle-Derived Stem Cells. Stem Cells Transl Med 2013; 2: 667–677.
26.
Russo VC, Higgins S, Werther GA, Cameron FJ: Effects of Fluctuating Glucose Levels on Neuronal Cells In vitro. Neurochem Res 2012; 37: 1768.
27.
Zhou Y, Besner GE: Heparin-Binding Epidermal Growth Factor-Like Growth Factor Is a Potent Neurotrophic Factor for PC12 Cells. Neurosignals 2010; 18: 141-151.
28.
Agholme L, Lindström T, Kågedal K, Marcusson J, Hallbeck M: An in vitro model for neuroscience: differentiation of SH-SY5Y cells into cells with morphological and biochemical characteristics of mature neurons. J Alzheimers Dis 2010; 20: 1069-1082.
29.
Mudò G, Bonomo A, Di LV, Frinchi M, Fuxe K, Belluardo N: The FGF-2/FGFRs neurotrophic system promotes neurogenesis in the adult brain. J Neural Transm 2009; 116: 995.
30.
Otto D, Unsicker K, Grothe C: Pharmacological effects of nerve growth factor and fibroblast growth factor applied to the transectioned sciatic nerve on neuron death in adult rat dorsal root ganglia. Neurosci Lett 1987; 83: 156-160.
31.
Chen SQ, Cai Q, Shen YY, Cai XY, Lei HY: Combined use of NGF/BDNF/bFGF promotes proliferation and differentiation of neural stem cells in vitro. Int J Dev Neurosci 2014; 38: 74-78.

Y. Wu and Z. Wang contributed equally to this work.

Open Access License / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND). Usage and distribution for commercial purposes as well as any distribution of modified material requires written permission. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.