Background/Aims:Cryptococcus neoformans infections are becoming increasingly prevalent and remain a life-threatening clinical issue in immune-compromised hosts. The microorganism evades a variety of endogenous anti-fungal mechanims of host immune cells. The signaling pathways in human immune cells that become activated in response to Cryptococcus neoformans infection have yet to be fully characterized. Methods: Human monocytes were incubated with Cryptococcus neoformans, and the whole transcriptome of monocytes was sequenced before and after exposure to Cryptococcus neoformans using mass parallel sequencing techniques. Based on the genes that demonstrated altered expression patterns, we performed GO and KEGG enrichment analysis to further characterize the pathways involved in monocyte activation by Cryptococcus neoformans. Results: We found that immune and inflammatory responses, as well as chemotaxis, were the most heavily activated cellular events. Specifically, the toll-like receptor, tumor necrosis factor, NF-kB and Jak-STAT pathways were the most active pathways in response to Cryptococcus neoformans infection. The sequencing data of selected genes from the transcriptome analysis were further validated by real-time polymerase chain reactions. Conclusion: Taken together, our study is the first characterization of the transcriptome alterations in human immune cells upon C. neoformans infection, providing additional information that may be helpful in discovering novel anti-fungal targets.

Cryptococcus neoformans is a pathogenic fungus found worldwide, which is characterized by the presence of an anti-phagocytic capsule [1]. Clinical cases of C.neoformans infection have become increasingly more prevalent over the past several decades, and patient prognosis is highly dependent on the ability of hosts to mount an effective immune response [2]. In immunocompetent individuals, pulmonary infection by C. neoformans is generally asymptomatic [3]; however, the organsism can cause life-threatening complications in immunocompromised states, such as in AIDS and in patients undergoing immune-suppressive therapy [4]. In the later stages of AIDS, the uncontrolled dispersal of C. neoformans in the lungs can cause severe and highly recurrent meningoencephalitis, which affects approximately 4-8% of AIDS patients [4]. Despite progress in the development of novel antifungal therapies, these treatments have not completely eradicated C. neoformans infection [5,6,7]. The difficulty in eradicating this organism lies in the intrinsic properties of its capsule, which can possibly explain the reasons behind its persistence and recurrence.

Host defense against C. neoformans infection is accomplished by the combined action of activated macrophages, NK cells and T cells [8]. In general, alveolar macrophages stand as the first-line innate defense against C. neoformans infection [9]. These cells phagocytose cryptococcal cells after host inhalation [9]. Monocytes are then recruited to the site of infection, playing an essential role in protective immunity of the host against C. neoformans [10]. Several studies have suggested that crosstalk between different types of immune cells may be crucial for an adequate anti-fungal response [11,12,13]. However, the signaling pathways mediating this highly coordinated process are not well understood.

On the other hand, we should note that C. neoformans might survive despite multiple immune barriers, as a result of an adaptive interaction of C. neoformans with host immune cells [14,15]. For example, several studies have shown that C. neoformans are resistant to anti-fungal compounds secreted by activated macrophages and can even survive after phagocytosed by macrophages [16,17,18]. The specific intracellular signaling pathways in the immune cells that are activated in response to fungal infection and utilized by the microbes for microenvironment adaptions remain unknown.

Although previous studies have identified some of the genes involved in the host response to C. neoformans (e.g. MCP1, IL10 and IL17A) [19,20,21,22,23], they mainly describe infection in murine models and have fallen short of a systemic exploration of all altered signal pathways. An understanding of these pathways and their potential for crosstalk may be necessary for pragmatic understanding of high resistance C. neoformans infections. Herein, we described the de novo mapping of the whole-transcriptome scale alterations in human monocytes before and after exposure to C. neoformans using Next-Generation sequencing. We then systematically analyzed the altered signaling pathways based on the differentially regulated genes. Furthermore, we validated many of these genes that were possibly involved in the immune response using real-time polymerase chain reactions (PCRs). Thus, we describe the first characterization of the transcriptome features in human monocytes in response to C. neoformans infection, which may provide useful data for the discovery of effective novel antifungal targets.

Reagents and media

RPMI 1640 medium and fetal calf serum (FCS) were purchased from Gibco BRL (Paisley, Scotland). Human blood was obtained from healthy donors. All media and buffers were tested for endotoxin contamination by the limulus amebocyte lysate assay (Sigma), which has a sensitivity of approximately 0.05- 0.1 ng of E. coli LPS/ml. All media and reagents tested were negative.

Preparation of peripheral blood monocytes (PBM)

Heparinized venous blood obtained from healthy donors was diluted with RPMI 1640, and peripheral blood monocytes (PBM) were separated by density-gradient centrifugation on Ficoll-Hypaque [24]. PBMC was recovered, washed twice in RPMI 1640 supplement, and incubated for 1 hour at a concentration of 2×107 to 3×107/ml in cell culture petri dishes (Nunc Inter Med, Roskilde, Denmark). Nonadherent cells were removed and adherent cells (PBM) were recovered as previously described [25].

Microorganisms and co-culture with C. neoformans

C. Neoformans H99 was cultured in YPD broth (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone and 2% dextrose) for 3-5 days at 30°C, harvested, washed with sterile saline, and inactivated by heating at 56°C for 60 min. The efficiency of heat-killing was assessed by culture in Sabouraud glucose broth, and negative cultures were defined as no growth after 5 days of incubation. Heat-killed C. Neoformans was washed with sterile saline, re-suspended in RPMI1640 medium, and adjusted to the appropriate concentration. Heat-killed C. neoformans (1×107/wall) was then added and incubated for 12 hours [26,27].

RNA Extraction, Library Preparation, and Sequencing

Total RNA was extracted from the infected and un-infected monocytes using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, USA). The quality and quantity of the RNA was validated using a Qubitfluorometer (Invitrogen, USA) and an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Inc., USA). The mRNA was enriched using oligo (dT) magnetic beads, and then fragmented into short fragments (approximately 200-700 nt) using fragmentation buffer (Invitrogen, USA). The cDNA synthesis was carried out according to the manufacturer's instructions. Following cDNA synthesis, the product was purified using a QiaQuick PCR extraction kit (Qiagen, USA) and eluted with EB buffer for end repair and poly(A) addition. Finally, sequencing adapters were ligated to the fragments, and the fragments were purified, followed by enrichment via PCR amplification. The library products were sequenced using the IlluminaHiSeqTM 2000 system.

Analysis of Transcriptome Sequencing Results

The low-quality reads were rejected, and clean reads were mapped to the human genome (GRCh37/hg19) using the computer software, MapSplice. We screened differentially-expressed genes between the infected and uninfected group using EB-Seq. For GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis, all differentially expressed genes were mapped to terms in the KEGG and GO databases and queried for significantly enriched terms.

Validation of RNA-seq Data with qRT-PCR

Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent and was pre-treated with DNAse to avoid DNA contamination. qRT-PCR was performed to verify the data obtained by RNA-seq using SYBR Green (TaKaRa, Japan) using the ABI 7500 SDS system (Applied Biosystems, USA) as previously described [28,29,30]. Primer sequences (5'-3', forward and reverse) used in the present study are as follows: CXCL1, F-TGC CAG CCA CTG TGA TAGAG; R-AGC CCC TTT GTT CTA AGC CAG; CXCL2, F-AGA TCA ATG TGA CGG CAGGG; R-TCT CTG CTC TAA CAC AGA GGGA; CXCL3, F-CGC CCA AAC CGA AGT CATAG; R-GCT CCC CTT GTT CAG TAT CTTTT; CXCL5, F-TCT GCA AGT GTT CGC CATAG; R-TGT CTT CCC TGG GTT CAGAG; CCL1, F-CTC ATT TGC GGA GCA AGA GAT; R-GCC TCT GAA CCC ATC CAA CTG; CCL4, F-GCT TTT CTT ACA CTG CGA GGA; R-CCA GGA TTC ACT GGG ATCAG; CCL7, F-AGA AGG ACC ACC AGT AGCCA; R-ACT AGT CCT ATT CCC TGC CCA; CCR2, F-TAC GGT GCT CCC TGT CAT AAA; R-TAA GAT GAG GAC GAC CAG CAT; IL1B, F-ATG ATG GCT TAT TAC AGT GGCAA; R-GTC GGA GAT TCG TAG CTGGA. MET, F-GAG CGC TTT GTG AGC AGATG; R-AAC CAG TGG AGA AGT CAGCG. Beta-actin was selected as the endogenous control. Primer efficiency was validated using standard protocols. Briefly, a standard curve of 10 genes was generated using which serial dilutions of amplified cDNA. The melting curves were determined before each test to confirm the specificity of each primer. The relative expression value was calculated via the 2-ΔΔCt method.

Data Acquisition and Statistical Analysis

Human monocytes were co-cultured with Cryptococcus neoformans (1:0 and 1:10) as previously described [2], and total RNA was collected for comparative transcriptome analysis. Samples were sequenced by IlluminaHiseq 2000. After trimming the adapter and low quality reads, 51588294 and 52303788 high quality reads were obtained from the uninfected and infected libraries for uninfected and infected groups, respectively. Clean reads were mapped to the human genome (GRCh37/hg19) using MapSplice. The mapping rate of uninfected and infected samples was 82.8% and 84.1% respectively. The corresponding raw data files were deposited into the SRA Database (SRR1823063).

Differential expression analysis

To explore the differential expressed genes (DEG) involved in infection of C. neoformans, we calculated the normalized expression values (FPKM, fragments per kilobase per million mapped reads) of each gene between infected and uninfected cells, and those values with greater than 2-fold change or less than 0.5-fold with a false discovery rate (FDR) less than 0.05 (p-value < 0.05) were considered as differentially-expressed genes by EB-Seq. A total of 893 genes were found to be up-regulated and 349 were down-regulated when comparing the two groups (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1

Differential expressed genes (DEG) involved in C. neoformans infections. The normalized expression values (RPKM, reads per kilobase per million mapped reads) of each gene between infected and uninfected monocytes. Genes with greater than 2-fold change with a false discovery rate (FDR) of less than 0.01 were considered as differentially expressed.

Fig. 1

Differential expressed genes (DEG) involved in C. neoformans infections. The normalized expression values (RPKM, reads per kilobase per million mapped reads) of each gene between infected and uninfected monocytes. Genes with greater than 2-fold change with a false discovery rate (FDR) of less than 0.01 were considered as differentially expressed.

Close modal

Ontologic Analysis of DEGs

Gene Ontology (GO) assignment was used to functionally categorize each of the differentially expressed genes. Of these, 701 unigenes were assigned to the ‘biological process (BP)', 698 to the ‘molecular function (MF)', and 751 to the ‘cellular component (CC)'. Within the BP category, the cluster for ‘inflammatory response' ranked the highest (70, 10.0%) followed by ‘immune response' (60, 8.6%), ‘cellular response to lipopolysaccharide' (24, 3.4%) and ‘chemotaxis' (30, 4.3%) (Fig. 2A). Within the ‘MF' category, the cluster for ‘cytokine activity' represented the largest group (50, 7.2%) followed by ‘chemokine activity' (18, 2.6%), ‘heparin binding' (20, 2.9%) and ‘growth factor activity' (21, 3.0%) (Fig. 2B). GO analysis for the ‘CC' category indicated that genes related to the ‘extracellular space', ‘extracellular region', ‘cell surface', and ‘interleukin-1 receptor binding' were enriched (Fig. 2C). Together, the results from this analysis confirmed that human monocytes stimulated by C. neoformans promote initiation of an inflammatory response by activating various cytokines.

Fig. 2

Enriched Gene Ontology (GO) terms assigned to differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in uninfected and Cryptococcus neoformans-infected monocytes. (A) biological process (BP); (B) cellular component (CC); (C) molecular function (MF).

Fig. 2

Enriched Gene Ontology (GO) terms assigned to differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in uninfected and Cryptococcus neoformans-infected monocytes. (A) biological process (BP); (B) cellular component (CC); (C) molecular function (MF).

Close modal

Pathway Enrichment Analysis of DEGs

To further understand the functions of the DEGs, we performed KEGG pathway analysis on the transcriptome data. Among the unigenes described in the KEGG pathway annotation, 227 pathways were involved, containing more than 342 DEGs. The top five pathways were ‘cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction' (56, 16.4%), ‘rheumatoid arthritis' (23, 6.7%), ‘TNF signaling pathway' (23, 6.7%), ‘malaria' (15, 4.4%), and ‘salmonella infection' (18, 5.3%) (Fig. 3A). Two additional key pathways, associated with the inflammatory and immune responses, were also involved in the top ten pathways: ‘Toll-like receptor signaling pathway' (19, 5.56%) and ‘Jak-STAT signaling pathway' (19, 5.56%). Meanwhile, these pathways appear to interact with each other as well as with the ‘cytokine-cytokine receptors', ‘Toll-like receptor signaling pathways', and the ‘Jak-STAT signaling pathways' (Fig. 3B). Table 1 illustrates the genes that were differentially altered with respect to the fold-change and FDR values. These key signaling pathways may warrant attention by future research efforts, given their roles in the human monocyte response to C. neoformans, and may represent potential targets for intervention.

Fig. 3

The pathway assignment based on KEGG. (A) The classification according to pathway analysis; (B) Interaction of pathways.

Fig. 3

The pathway assignment based on KEGG. (A) The classification according to pathway analysis; (B) Interaction of pathways.

Close modal

Relative qRT-PCR Analysis

Within the DEGs and pathways identified, we were particularly interested in transcripts involved in cytokine-cytokine receptor interactions, as well as inflammatory and immune responses. Therefore, 19 randomly-selected DEGs and 35 DEGs related to inflammatory or immune response were validated in 6 pairs of cases with or without C.neoformans infection by qRT-PCR using the ABI 7500 SDS system with SYBR Green. As expected, genes involved in inflammatory or immune response were dramatically changed after infection. Fig. 4 illustrates the altered genes including: CXCL1, CXCL2, CXCL3, CXCL5, IL1B, CCL1, CCL4, CCL7, CCR2, and MET. Each of these genes, with the exception of CCR2, were found to be increased in human monocytes after stimulation by C. neoformans. Briefly, the expression levels of CXCL1, CXCL2, CXCL3, CXCL5, IL1B, CCL1, CCL4, and MET were sharply increased in 5 of 6 samples. CCL7 mRNA level was decreased in one sample but upregulated in the other 5 samples. CCR2 was ubiquitously decreased in human monocytes after stimulation by C. neoformans. Taken together, it appeasr that increased expression of CXCL1, CXCL2, CXCL3, CXCL5, IL1B, CCL1, CCL4, MET and down-regulation of CCR2 may be required for human monocytes to mount a response to C. neoformans.

Fig. 4

Validation of differentially expressed genes in both uninfected and Cryptococcus neoformans-infected monocytes.

Fig. 4

Validation of differentially expressed genes in both uninfected and Cryptococcus neoformans-infected monocytes.

Close modal

In the current study, we describe the differences seen in the transcriptomes of peripheral blood monocytes before and after stimulation with C. neoformans infection. A total of 1243 differentially-expressed genes were detected in this study. Gene ontologic analysis and pathway enrichment investigations were then performed for each of these genes. This study detected many genes involved in inflammatory response that were significantly altered during exposure to the fungus. Specifically, pathways of TNF-α, Jak-Stat and toll-like receptors were activated in PBM upon C. neoformans exposure. Further validation of the inflammatory genes was performed using RT-PCRs, which confirmed that many chemokine and cytokine genes were selectively expressed by PBM. This study has revealed a number of important genes and signaling pathways provide insight into the immune response that is generated upon exposure of monocytes to Cryptococcus neoformans. One important limitation of the current study was the use of heat-killed fungal cells during the incubation step of our experiments. Although this method is widely described in the current literature, [26,27] such a preparation may potentially affect the final results, as cell surface immunestimulatory molecules may be modified.

Many of the previous mechanistic studies concerning the host defense against C. neoformans have been based on animal models [31,32,33,34]. In contrast to these methods, we incorporated human monocytes as an immune cell model in this study. Consistent with previous findings [31,32,33,34], we found that the inflammatory and immune response ranked as the first and second most altered biological processes after exposure. It is important to note that, since these studies have not been performed previously in human monocytes, they offer proof-of-principle confirmation that this is a suitable cell model. The extensive immune response of PBM upon C. neoformans exposure was also reflected by up-regulation of many mRNAs encoding cytokines, including interferon and interleukin. These molecules have been reported contribute to host innate immune response to C. neoformans infection [31,32,33,34]. The fact that cytokine activity ranked the first largest cluster of differential genes is fully complimented by similar observations in clinical cases of C. neoformans infection [31,32,33,34].

Our mRNA sequencing data also revealed that many chemokines were selectively expressed in response to C. neoformans. Although increased chemotaxis has been reported in immune system stimulation [35,36,37], the exact chemokines and receptors involved have so far remained undescribed. Among those differentially-expressed genes revealed by mRNA sequencing, the up-regulation of specific chemokine and chemokine receptors were confirmed using real-time PCR, including CXCL1, CCL1, CXCL2, CCL4, CXCL5 and CCR2. Of note, CCL1 and CXCL5 have yet to be reported in the immune cell response to C. neoformans infection [35,36,37]. CCL1 has been reported the regulation of anti-bacterial innate immunity of macrophages and is also one of the major effectors involved in the eradication of C. neoformans [38]. CXCL5 may regulate host defense in response to bacterial infection in the lung, which is the most common site of C. neoformans infection [39,40]. However, further studies are required to demonstrate the exact roles of CCL1 and CXCL5.

Another novel finding of the transcriptome analysis was the potential role of the Jak-STAT pathway in PBM after C. neoformans exposure. In addition to other previously-described pathways (i.e. toll-like receptor signaling, NF-κB signaling and the TNFα signaling) [41,42,43,44], the pathway interaction analysis revealed that Jak-STAT signaling has a central position that potentially bridges nine other pathways within the network. We found that 18 genes of Jak-STAT pathway were upregulated, including LIF, IL2RA, CISH, IL10, CSF3, PRLR, OSM, IL3RA, IL12B, CRLF2, IL6, IL24, PIM1, IL20, IL23A, CSF2 and SOCS3. Many of these genes have not been revealed by prior studies. These results indicate that putative fungicidal activity of the Jak-STAT pathway warrants additional studies.

In summary, this is the first report of a high-resolution transcriptome map of monocytes following exposure to C. neoformans. These findings update and contribute to the current understanding of host defenses involved in C. neoformans and may lead to novel mechanistic insight that will hopefully be useful in the development of novel anti-fungal strategies.

This study was supported by grants from National 973 Foundation (2013CB531606), National Science Foundation of China (81471605, 31400778, 81472770, 81371786, 81302579, 81300748, 81273282, 81272280, 81202353), Shanghai Municipal Commission for Science and Technology (11JC1410902), Shanghai Pujiang Talent Grant, Shanghai Shenkang Grant (CHDC22014014), Changhai Hospital (CH125530300).

The authors declare there are no conflicts of interest.

1.
Kwong-Chung KJ, JE Bennett: Medical mycology. Lea and Febinger, Malvern, 1992, vol 10, pp 397-446.
2.
Kozubowski L, Heitman J: Profiling a killer, the development of Cryptococcus neoformans. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2012:36:78-94.
3.
Boyton RJ, Altmann DM, Wright A, Kon OM: Pulmonary infection with Cryptococcus neoformans in the face of underlying sarcoidosis. Respiration 2007:74:462-466.
4.
Mitchell TG, Perfect JR: Cryptococcosis in the era of AIDS-100 years after the discovery of Cryptococcus neoformans. Clin Microbiol Rev 1995:8:515-548.
5.
Miller JM, Smith GW, Headley WH: Treatment of Cryptococcus neoformans in mice with stilbamidine. Science 1953:118:31.
6.
Slonov E, Chang YC, Kwon-Chung KJ: Azole heteroresistance in Cryptococcus neoformans: emergence of resistant clones with chromosomal disomy in the mouse brain during fluconazole treatment. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2013:57:5127-5130.
7.
Tripathi K, Mor V, Bairwa NK, Del Poeta M, Mohanty BK: Hydroxyurea treatment inhibits proliferation of Cryptococcus neoformans in mice. Front Microbiol 2012:3:187.
8.
Kronstad J, Saikia S, Nielson ED, Kretschmer M, Jung W, Hu G, Geddes JM, Griffiths EJ, Choi J, Cadieux B, Caza M, Attarian R: Adaption of Cryptococcus neoformans to mammalian hosts: integrated regulation of metabolism and virulence. Eukaryot Cell 2012:11:109-118.
9.
McQuiston TJ, Williamson PR: Paradoxical roles of alveolar macrophages in the host response to Cryptococcus neoformans. J Infect Chemother 2012:18:1-9.
10.
Vecchiarelli A, Retini C, Pietrella D, Monari C, Kozel TR: T lymphocyte and monocyte interaction by CD40/CD40 ligand facilitates a lymphoproliferative response and killing of Cryptococcus neoformans in vitro. Eur J Immunol 2000:30:1385-1393.
11.
Montone KT: Regulating the T-cell immune response toward the H99 strain of Cryptococcus neoformans. Am J Pathol 2009:175:2255-2256.
12.
Hidore MR, Nabavi N, Sonleitner F, Murphy JW: Murine natural killer cells are fungicidal to Cryptococcus neoformans. Infect Immun 1991:59:1747-1754.
13.
Murphy JW: Protective cell-mediated immunity against Cryptococcus neoformans. Res Immunol 1998:149:373-386.
14.
Perfect JR, Cox GM: Drug resistance in Cryptococcus neoformans. Drug Resist Updat 1999:2:259-269.
15.
Buchanan KL, Doyle HA: Requirement for CD4(+) T lymphocytes in host resistance against Cryptococcus neoformans in the central nervous system of immunized mice. Infect Immun 2000:68:456-462.
16.
Griffin FM Jr: Roles of macrophage Fc and C3b receptors in phagocytosis of immunologically coated Cryptococcus neoformans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1981:78:3853-3857.
17.
May RC, Smith LM, Dixon EF: The fungal pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans manipulates macrophage phagosome maturation. Cell Microbiol 2014:17:702-713.
18.
Oliveira DL, Freire-de-Lima CG, Nosanchuk JD, Casadevall A, Rodrigues ML, Nimrichter L: Extracellular vesicles from Cryptococcus neoformans modulate macrophage functions. Infect Immun 2010:78:1601-1609.
19.
Huffnagle GB, Strieter RM, Standiford TJ, McDonald RA, Burdick MD, Kunkel SL, Toews GB: The role of monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) in the recruitment of monocytes and CD4+ T cells during a pulmonary Cryptococcus neoformans infection. J Immunol 1995:155:4790-4797.
20.
Monari C, Retini C, Palazzetti B, Bistoni F, Vecchiarelli A: Regulatory role of exogenous IL-10 in the development of immune response versus Cryptococcus neoformans. Clin Exp Immunol 1997:109:242-247.
21.
Szymczak WA, Sellers RS, Pirofski LA: IL-23 dampens the allergic response to Cryptococcus neoformans through IL-17-independent and -dependent mechanisms. Am J Pathol 2012:180:1547-1559.
22.
Wozniak KL, Hardison SE, Kolls JK, Wormley FL: Role of IL-17A on resolution of pulmonary C. neoformans infection. PLoS One 2011:6: e17204.
23.
Pericolini E, Alunno A, Gabrielli E, Bartoloni E, Cenci E, Chow SK, Bistoni G, Casadevall A, Gerli R, Vecchiarelli A: The microbial capsular polysaccharide galactoxylomannan inhibits IL-17A production in circulating T cells from rheumatoid arthritis patients. PLoS One 2013:8: e53336.
24.
Vecchiarelli A, Pietrella D, Dottorini M, Monari C, Retini C, Todisco T, Bistoni F: Encapsulation of Cryptococcusneoformans regulates fungicidal activity and the antigen presentation process in human alveolar macrophages. Clin Exp Immunol 1994:98:217-223.
25.
Pietrella D, Monari C, Retini C, Palazzetti B, Kozel TR, vecchiarelli A: Cryptococcus neoformans and Candida albicans regulate CD4 expression on human monocytes. J Infect Dis1998:178:1464-1471.
26.
Lupo P, Chang YC, Kelsall BL, Farber JM, Pietrella D, Vecchiarelli A, Leon F, Kwon-Chung KJ: The presence of capsule in Cryptococcus neoformans influences the gene expression profile in dendritic cells during interaction with the fungus. Infect Immun 2008:76:1581-1589.
27.
Kawakami K, Kohno S, Kadota J, Tohyama M, Teruya K, Kudeken N, Saito A, Hara K: T cell-dependent activation of macrophages and enhancement of their phagocytic activity in the lungs of mice inoculated with heat-killed Cryptococcus neoformans: involvement of IFN-gamma and its protective effect against cryptococcal infection. Microbiol Immunol 1995:39:135-143.
28.
Zheng D, Dong S, Li T, Yang F, Yu X, Wu J, Zhong X, Zhao Y, Wang L, Xu C, Lu F, Zhang W: Exogenous Hydrogen Sulfide Attenuates Cardiac Fibrosis Through Reactive Oxygen Species Signal Pathways in Experimental Diabetes Mellitus Models. Cell Physiol Biochem 2015;36:917-929.
29.
Wang H, Bei Y, Lu Y, Sun W, Liu Q, Wang Y, Cao Y, Chen P, Xiao J, Kong X: Exercise Prevents Cardiac Injury and Improves Mitochondrial Biogenesis in Advanced Diabetic Cardiomyopathy with PGC-1α and Akt Activation. Cell Physiol Biochem 2015;35:2159-2168.
30.
Zhang A, Han Y, Wang B, Li S, Gan W: Beyond Gap Junction Channel Function: the Expression of Cx43 Contributes to Aldosterone-Induced Mesangial Cell Proliferation via the ERK1/2 and PKC Pathways. Cell Physiol Biochem 2015;36:1210-1222.
31.
Cinzia R, Arturo C, Donatella P: Specific activated T Cells regulate IL-12 production by human monocytes stimulated with Cryptococcus neoformans. J Immunol 1999:162:1618-1623.
32.
Feretzaki M, Hardison SE, Wormley FL, Jr Heitman J: Cryptococcus neoformans hyperfilamentous strain is hypervirulent in a murine model of cryptococcal meningoencephalitis. PLoS One 2014:9:e104432.
33.
Gyetko MR, Chen GH, McDonald RA, Goodman R, Huffnagle GB, Wilkinson CC, Fuller JA, Toews GB: Urokinase is required for the pulmonary inflammatory response to Cryptococcus neoformans. A murine transgenic model. J Clin Invest 1996:97: 1818-1826.
34.
Nasti TH, Khan MA, Owais M: Enhanced efficacy of pH-sensitive nystatin liposomes against Cryptococcus neoformans in murine model. J Antimicrob Chemother 2006:57:349-352.
35.
Durr MC, Kristian SA, Otto M, Matteoli G, Margolis PS, Trias J, van Kessel KP, van Strijp JA, Bohn E, Landmann R, Peschel A: Neutrophil chemotaxis by pathogen-associated molecular patterns-formylated peptides are crucial but not the sole neutrophil attractants produced by Staphylococcus aureus. Cell Microbiol 2006:8:207-217.
36.
Olsen JE, Hoegh-Andersen KH, Casadesus J, Rosenkranzt J, Chadfield MS, Thomsen LE: The role of flagella and chemotaxis genes in host pathogen interaction of the host adapted Salmonella enterica serovar Dublin compared to the broad host range serovar S. Typhimurium. BMC Microbiol 2013:13:67.
37.
Diamond RD, Erickson NF 3rd: Chemotaxis of human neutrophils and monocytes induced by Cryptococcus neoformans. Infect Immun 1982:38:380-382.
38.
Doyle HA1, Murphy JW: Role of the C-C chemokine, TCA3, in the protective anticryptococcal cell-mediated immune response. J Immunol 1999:162:4824-4833.
39.
Slight SR, Rangel-Moreno J, Gopal R, Lin Y, Fallert Junecko BA, Mehra S, Selman M, Becerril-Villanueva E, Baquera-Heredia J, Pavon L, Kaushal D, Reinhart TA, Randall TD, Khader SA: CXCR5(+) T helper cells mediate protective immunity against tuberculosis. J Clin Invest 2013:123:712-726.
40.
Boyden AW, Legge KL, Waldschmidt TJ: Pulmonary infection with influenza A virus induces site-specific germinal center and T follicular helper cell responses. PLoS One 2012:7:e40733.
41.
Shoham S, Huang C, Chen JM, Golenbock DT, Levitz SM: Toll-like receptor 4 mediates intracellular signaling without TNF-alpha release in response to Cryptococcus neoformans polysaccharide capsule. J Immunol 2001:166:4620-4626.
42.
Kawakami K, Qifeng X, Tohyama M, Qureshi MH, Saito A: Contribution of tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) in host defence mechanism against Cryptococcus neoformans. Clin Exp Immunol 1996:106:468-474.
43.
Ben-Abdallah M, Sturny-Leclere A, Ave P, Louise A, Moyrand F, Weih F, Janbon G, Memet S: Fungal-induced cell cycle impairment, chromosome instability and apoptosis via differential activation of NF-kappaB. PLoS Pathog 2012:8:e1002555.
44.
Deng W, Li W, Zeng J, Zhao Q, Li C, Zhao Y, Xie J: Mycobacterium tuberculosis PPE family protein Rv1808 manipulates cytokines profile via co-activation of MAPK and NF-κB signaling pathways. Cell Physiol Biochem 2014:33:273-288.

S. Chen, H. Yan and L. Zhang contributed equally to this work.

Open Access License / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Open Access License: This is an Open Access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported license (CC BY-NC) (www.karger.com/OA-license), applicable to the online version of the article only. Distribution permitted for non-commercial purposes only.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.